Someday someone’s going to write a well-received book that compiles the public statements top lawyers in this regime made and weighs them against the statements made when subject to Rule 11 in court pleadings and tell the story of the constant delta between those statements.
Im talking about political appointees who are also lawyers, defending the policies and saying things out of court, on the one hand, versus DOJ lawyers signing pleadings and lawyer who sign declarations, on the other.
You could spend an entire chapter on the lies federal courts have caught DHS in and documented and threatened to sanction them for. Judge Hatter. Hamama. The Massachusetts covid litigation. The Mesa Verde covid litigation. Fraihat. DACA. Ms. L.
So. Many. Habeas. Cases.
So. Many. Habeas. Cases.
All those lies sort of all stem from the Initial Lie, which #scotus greenlit in the #MuslimBan cases, which is that you can openly state your racist intention for a policy, then issue the policy, then have it enjoined but somehow wash the replacement of the original racist intent
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
