To explain the inside joke: The more the coronavirus makes in-person interactions dangerous, the more valuable Zoom is.
So Zoom's stock crashing can signal that traders believe we're making progress in the war on the virus — like today's news about a potentially powerful vaccine.
A successful vaccine would be a huge boost for vast swathes of the (non-Zoom) economy. While the stock market is not the economy, the sharp rise in broad stock indices gives you a a sense of the tremendous optimism that this would be a huge boost.
An important and underappreciated point that should guide both our personal choices (mask up!) and policy decisions (the case to rush a reopening has never been weaker).
Payrolls +638k in October, and the unemployment rate has fallen by a full percentage point to 6.9% (even as participation rose).
A very strong household report, with a weaker (but pretty much as expected) payrolls report.
Sadly, the payrolls report is usually more informative.
That unemployment rate is worth digging into. It comes from a separate survey, in which employment was reported to have grown by a massive 2.2 million.
This decline in unemployment occurred even as the labor force grew 724k.
It's good news, but from the less reliable survey.
Usually payrolls growth of +638k would be fantastic news. But right now, much less so.
The economy lost 22 million jobs Feb-Apr, and had made half of that back by Sept.
If we crawl back the remaining 11 million jobs at this rate, it'll take ages. The recovery is worryingly slow
Lemme tell you a little about why I'm not putting much weight on prediction markets this election. The short version is that the main US market, @PredictIt, is structured in a way that allows big mis-pricings to persist.
Right now, you can sell a share that pays $1 if Trump wins, for 40 cents. I would love to do that. But there are large transaction costs that get in the way, and they're so big that it would be wrong to infer that markets believe that Trump is anywhere near a 40% chance to win.
Let's say that I'm willing sell 1000 of these shares, effectively buying "Not Trump" shares for 60 cents. If so, I'll lose $600 if Trump wins. You might think that I stand to win $400 if Trump loses, but that's not quite the whole story, because transaction costs are a big deal.
GDP rose by +7.4% in Q3 (pretty much exactly as expected), after falling by -9.0% in Q2 and -1.3% in Q1. All told, the economy is -3.5% smaller than it was at the end of 2019.
For context, the economy is roughly as far below its peak as in the darkest days of the last recession
When the economy rises by +7.4%, some will report this as being at an "annualized rate" of 33.1%.
Lemme be crystal clear: This does not mean that the economy is now one-third bigger. (Lemme explain...)
Reporting *quarterly* GDP growth at an *annualized* rate answers the question: If the economy also grew at this rate for the next 3 quarters, how much larger would the economy be?
But there's no chance that will happen, so the annualized rate answers a question no-one is asking.
Payrolls rose +661k in September and unemployment fell half a point to 7.9%.
We are still 11 million jobs below the February level -- a larger gap than at the low point of the financial crisis.
The economy is a deep hole, and the rate at which we're digging out is slowing.
While unemployment fell sharply (down by -970k), it's mainly because participation plunged, and the labor force fell by -695k.
The easy work of ending furloughs is slowing (temporary layoffs were down by 1.5 million), but the harder work of repairing the more lasting damage is only growing, and permanent layoffs were up by 345,000.
Hey look, my favorite economist is testifying at the @WaysMeansCmte in Washington-ish in the next few minutes (around 12:15pm). She's got a lot to say about our way out of our current mess.
You can watch here on twitter (link below), or on youtube here: