Here's 39 things President-Elect Biden could do to take #ClimateAction, featuring a round-up of voices from across the climate policy landscape: bloomberg.com/features/2020-…
My entry w/@CostaSamaras: appoint climate-focused Budget Director and White House Chief of Staff. Why? 🧵⤵️
President-elect Biden’s chief of staff and OMB director must align all federal agencies, spending, and legislative strategy around four big goals: ending the pandemic, rebuilding the economy, dismantling systemic racism, and confronting climate change. 1/
Cabinet secretaries get a higher profile, but no other positions beyond the President him or herself has a broader reach across the federal government than the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and White House Chief of Staff. 2/
The OMB director sets the budget and policy guidance that aligns all federal programs and regulations. The chief of staff directs the West Wing and is also the lead negotiator for the president’s legislative agenda. 3/
Both roles are key: much can be done with executive authority (see 39 ideas here for many possibilities bloomberg.com/features/2020-…), but Congress controls the power of the purse, and a large pandemic relief and economic recovery bill that centers on clean energy is much-needed. 4/
The wide reach of these two key figures is crucial because #ClimateChange affects everything. There’s no single agency that can build a climate-resilient national infrastructure, deploy clean energy, ensure a just transition to clean energy, and manage climate disasters. 5/
With so much work to do & so much time wasted, the Biden Admin. has to be nimble, creative, and relentless at deploying all the tools at their disposal. Every regulation, executive action, dollar spent, and legislative proposal should be crafted with several questions in mind: 6/
1. How can we rebuild our economy with clean and energy-efficient technologies?
2. How can we future-proof our critical infrastructure for a changing climate? 7/
3. How can America manufacture and export climate tech?
4. How can we reduce the public health impacts of fossil energy, which disproportionately hit vulnerable communities? 8/
A climate-focused Director of Office of Management and Budget and Chief of Staff can ensure these key questions will be prioritized in every corner of the Executive Branch.
I can't wait for them to get to work.
9/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They're right (with a few exceptions). Here's why...
We already have over 540 gigawatts of natural-gas fired generating capacity in the U.S. today. That's enough to meet about 2/3 of our nationwide peak in electricity demand. That's plenty of capacity to help manage the variability of weather-dependent wind & solar as they scale up
Those existing natural gas power plants will play a key role in the near-term as what I've termed "firm" generating capacity: available on demand (dispatchable), any time of the year, for as long as needed. (For more on firm generation, see doi.org/10.1016/j.joul…)
Wind, solar & battery costs have plummeted & energy storage installs are booming. Good timing for my new paper w/@dhariksm & @nsepulvedam on "Long-run system value of battery energy storage in future grids with increasing wind and solar generation"
Our new study out in @ElsevierEnergy's journal Applied Energy finds that the economic value of storage increases as variable renewable energy generation supplies an increasing share of electricity supply but that storage cost declines are needed to realize full potential.
We used a detailed electricity system planning model (energy.mit.edu/wp-content/upl…) to examine battery storage & determine key drivers that impact its economic value, how value changes w/increasing deployment over time, and implications for the long-term cost-effectiveness of storage.
In round #s: assuming electrification consistent w/net zero economy wide emissions by 2050, US needs ~5k-5.5k TWh of total electricity in 2035 (vs ~4k now). Need to ~double again by 2050 too! We have on order or 1.5k TWh from all clean sources today (about 1/2 nuclear & 1/2 RE).
So that says we need to more than triple all current carbon-free generation from now to 2035 to meet Biden goal. And we would need to build ~7 times current carbon-free generation cumulatively by 2050 to keep up with growing electric demand from EVs, heat pumps, electrolysis, etc
I'm a co-PI of @Princeton's Net Zero America study which is researching what it will take to get the US to net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. We'll be sharing findings later this year on the scale and pace of this undertaking and the impacts on employment, pollution, etc.
A new ICE order from the Trump Administration out today may result in deportation of thousands of international students attending U.S. universities. Pure spite and racist hatred as policy. 😡 ice.gov/news/releases/…
As many universities (including mine) go partially or entirely online this Fall to continue their educational missions and contend with health risks of #COVID19, this new policy bars students on nonimmigrant F-1 visas from taking courses entirely online while residing in the U.S.
It simultaneously prohibits those in the U.S. from taking more than 1 class online while maintaining their visa status. In effect, this order forces students to take a full course load (less 1 online class) in person, whether that is safe or not, or to leave the country entirely
Im prepping my second to last lecture for 'Introduction to the Electricity Sector' -- on distributed energy resources & associated regulatory challenges. It's made me revisit the huge body of work published out of @MITEnergy Utility of the Future study effort...
I was so fortunate to be part of this effort, to learn from mythical figures in the field including Ignacio Perez-Arriaga (our fearless leader & my mentor), Dick Schmalensee, Bill Hogan, Paul Joskow, Michael Caramanis, Dick Tabors, Tomas Gomez, Carlos Batlle, and many more...
...and to get to spend 5 yrs thinking through regulatory challenges posed by growth of distributed energy resources with a crew of brilliant young scholars incl. @burgersb, Jose Pablo Chaves, Ash Bharatkumar, Pablo Duenas, Ignacio Herrero, Claudio Vergara, Sam Huntington & more.
"Months, not weeks." that's the phrase that went bouncing around in my head all day.
Modeled scenarios I've seen for spread of #COVID19 in US (eg nyti.ms/2wSDnro) dont have us past peak infections until summer, and later if we successfully in to flattening the curve.
The paradox: the better we are at maintaining social distance -- work from home, closed schools, kids kept from play dates, no dinner parties, etc -- the longer until we're past peak infections. The better we do, the less "severe" things will seem, making it harder to maintain.
But the difference between a peak of infections in July vs Sept is the difference between an overloaded medical system or one that can keep pace with the strain, and literally 100s of thousands of lives saved.