Ferg Profile picture
19 Nov, 7 tweets, 2 min read
Thread

Charles Ellis had the idea of the "losers game"

Professional tennis is a "winners game" i.e. you win by hitting winning shots

Amateur tennis is a "loser's game" i.e. you win by not making mistakes.

Investing is a loser's game.

Avoiding making stupid mistakes is key
The 1st rule is to avoid anything that prevents you staying at the table

Always be long time & avoid margin

Rick Guerin was Buffet and Mungers equal in intelligence yet he wanted to get rich quicker & used margin

He got margin called in 73 & sold all $BRK to Buffet at bottom
2nd rule: Is to make sure the company can stay at the table.

Cashflow?

Cash levels?

Debt levels?

When are debts maturing?

Will they be able to roll at the same terms?

Historic rate of dilution if small miner?

Read the 10Q and 10K do the work!
3rd rule: Understand the incentives.

Are management incentives aligned with shareholders?

Review executive compensation

Who owns the stock and how much?

Review G & A costs. Same as peers or is it a lifestyle company?

Make sure the money is going to the right places.
4th rule: Execution is key

Results or excuses?

History of executing plans or "pivoting"?

The only project some CEO's will ever execute on is getting themselves a yacht.
5th rule: Price action matters

No matter how airtight the thesis it needs to be confirmed by price action.

If price is breaking down put the thesis on the shelf and keep an eye on it.

"The right thing at the wrong time is the wrong thing" -Joshua Harris
6th rule: Conviction is everything

Do the work.

Great investments are uncomfortable to buy.

Be prepared to look stupid for periods.

"Volatility is the price you pay for returns" - Bill Miller

And without conviction, you can't stomach much volatility

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ferg

Ferg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @trader_ferg

17 Nov
Damn this comparison is chilling from Neil Postman

I need to read a Brave New World following reading 1984 a few months ago.

“We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came & the prophecy didn't, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves.
The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we at least had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares.

But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell's dark vision, there was another - slightly older, slightly less well known, equally chilling:
Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Contrary to common belief even among the educated, Huxley and Orwell did not prophesy the same thing.

Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression.
Read 8 tweets
10 Nov
Thread

These are 10 heuristics/ideas that have served me well and I lean on them whenever considering a decision or making an investment.

Benefited hugely from the ideas and wisdom of Charlie Munger, Howard Marks, @jposhaughnessy @morganhousel and @nntaleb.
1. Incentives

“Show me the incentives and I will show you the outcome.” - Charlie Munger

Ensuring incentives are aligned positions you for better outcomes.

At the minimum know what everyone's incentives are before entering any deal/investment.
2. Asymmetry

Position for ideally large (unknown) upside and small (known) downside

"If you ‘have optionality,’ you don’t have much need for what is commonly called intelligence, knowledge, insight, skills and these complicated things that take place in our brain cells"-N Taleb
Read 11 tweets
10 Nov
Thread

I've been trying to wrap my head around how we headed up in this mess of multiple lockdowns

Don't buy the power grab(few exceptions) or incompetence arguments

Listening to @profplum99 interview @Gavekal a theory was outlined that makes a lot of sense

CYA=Cover your ass
Now CYA was always fairly prominent in democracies

Adding social media to the mix was like adding 100x leverage to a trade(makes it easy to blow yourself up)

So politicians were terrified of being held accountable for deaths

So obviously they have zero incentive to take risks
"Now that every policy choice is reviewed and debated in real-time by millions of people around the world, CYA has become all-important.

Politicians have to put policies in place to hedge against the wildest tail risks imaginable."
Read 9 tweets
5 Nov
Thread

I was digging through some notes from reading @AnnieDuke book: Thinking in Bets.

Loved this book and her podcast with @ritholtz
on Masters-in-business.

This is a key book for anyone interested in trading/investing

Here are some of my takeaways and favorite quotes.
1. How sure are you of a belief you hold if asked, “Wanna bet $1000 your belief is correct?”

Are you still 100% sure or maybe only 70%?

This helps to ensure you’re not blindly defending your belief and instead inviting skepticism and a search for the best information.
2. “Thinking in bets starts with recognizing that there are exactly two things that determine how our lives turn out:

The quality of our decisions and luck.

Learning to recognize the difference between the two is what thinking in bets is all about.”
Read 17 tweets
3 Aug
Thread

Had never heard of the Princess Brides battle of wits

Mike Green @profplum99 mentions it is the basis for his twitter avatar and a reminder to ensure he's playing the game he thinks he is playing

Didn't really follow so looked up the dialogue

It's so good....
Man in Black: I challenge you to a battle of wits.

Vizzini: For the princess?  

To the death?  

I accept. 

Man in Black: Good.

Then pour the wine. 

[Vizzini pours the wine, and the Man in Black pulls out a small vial]
[He puts the goblets behind his back and, presumably, adds the poison to one of them, then sets them down in front of him]

All right. Where is the poison? The battle of wits has begun. It ends when you decide and we both drink, and find out who is right... and who is dead.
Read 14 tweets
31 Jul
Thread

Had a few aha moments thanks to the work of Mike Green @profplum99 & @HorizonKinetics

1. Passive being ‘buy and hold’ is misleading as really they are actually systematic active investors at any price

Positive flows = buy at any price
Negative flows = sell at any price
2. Passive is cornering stocks float

Take Amazon

Market cap minus inside ownership (15%) =$1.2T

Passive holds ~$910B which isn't for sale and is increasing with positive inflows

Which means available float is only ~290B

Index funds are in process of cornering $AMZN stock
3. Passive being past the point of being able to rebalance

Take Tech =21% of the index

What happens if it wants to rebalance into energy at 3%

There is only $1 active for $2 passive so they can't buy it and why would they buy it?

Energy is likely outperforming hence rebalance
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!