HANDBALL LAW UPDATE

Just in from the crucial IFAB meeting to decide any clarifications in the 2021-22 laws.

In relation to the handball Law, given that the interpretation of handball incidents has not always been consistent, further clarification is supported.
Notwithstanding the revised 2019-20 wording, it was re-emphasised that the final judgment remains with the referee and not every touch of a player’s hand/arm with the ball is an offence.
For the definition of “unnaturally bigger”, referees should judge the position of the arm in relation to the player’s movement.

While the handball law is not going to be rewritten, it should now be tidied up and clarified from the mess it is in the written laws.
It is worth noting that the comments coming out of the IFAB meeting suggest this is more about making sure the laws truly reflect the decisions that are being taken, rather than them being ambiguous.
OFFSIDE LAW

This is all pretty much as I have explained before, about a fix being for all football & crucially not affecting the ability of linesman to do their job.

Advisory panels discussed potential options to be explored around making the game more attractive and dynamic.
If any concrete proposal is to be considered, it would need to be applicable at all levels of the game and easy to apply for the match officials, mindful of the dynamic nature of player’s movement.
It was agreed that extensive trials would be necessary before a Law change could be proposed.

So we are a long, long way from any change to offside. With the need for trials, and no specific modification on the table, it looks like it's going to be 2023-24 at the earliest.
Just one final note on handball. The clarification from the IFAB today sounds pretty much what the Premier League agreed with it to implement at the end of September.

We will have to see what is agreed at the full IFAB ABM on Dec. 16.
Concerned people are reading too much into “every touch of the players hand/arm is not an offence” in the wording of the statement. That is the case now too.

Have to wait and see what the IFAB does change, but after speaking to them last week I wouldn't expect a full roll back.
If I were a betting man (I am!) then I would say any clarification to the written laws would be very similar to what you read here, which was agreed with the IFAB.

Would like the "arm above the shoulder" element to be relaxed, however.

premierleague.com/news/1849937
After the IFAB's advisory panels met to discuss the handball law, here's a detailed look at handball pens in top 5 leagues & UCL.

- Surge post-2018
- Reasons, and how leagues reacted
- Cultural influence in Latin countries

espn.co.uk/football/engli…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dale Johnson

Dale Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DaleJohnsonESPN

23 Nov
It's your Monday VAR thread, looking at:

- The increasing mess of "clear and obvious"
- Man United penalty
- Handball uncertainty
Regular readers of this thread will know that it's not the VAR's job to make sure a ref gets every decision right.

Otherwise the game is being totally re-refereed to the subjective opinion of the VAR.

The VAR is there to correct CLEAR errors. So it's where we have a problem.
With the WBA and Aston Villa penalties, there was definite contact on the shins of Conor Gallagher and Trezeguet.

So, are we now saying that a feather brush of the ball with the studs rules out a penalty through VAR? But without it (Salah) the penalty stands?
Read 17 tweets
21 Nov
Oh. My. Word.

Orlando goalkeeper Pedro Gallese saves the final spot-kick to send them through to the Conference semifinals.

But the VAR spots that Gallese had come off his line. Retake ordered.

But Gallese had already been booked, and gets a second yellow!

Shootout back on!
This is incredible. Orlando have made a sub to bring goalkeeper Brian Rowe on to take part in the shootout.

But the officials have no idea if Orlando are allowed to do it.

Rowe has been to the goal, back to the bench, and now he's back to the goal!

What the hell is going on.
And now Rowe is back to the bench, outfield player Rodrigo Schlegel goes in goal.

New York City score. But Nani MISSES the winning penalty chance.
Read 10 tweets
9 Nov
It's the Monday VAR thread. A busy one today for some reason.... including:

- Bamford offside
- Handball!
- Barkley offside
Starting with the worst of the weekend, the Patrick Bamford disallowed goal for Leeds at Palace.

There's no point going over the general flaws again, you can read about that in detail in the attached thread, but I'll cover the specifics of this decision.
First a reminder that you can now play the ball with the top of your arm after the law changed in the summer. It's why Mane was offside against Everton too.

And you can score with it; Gabriel already has for Arsenal against Fulham.
Read 29 tweets
7 Nov
Patrick Bramford offside because of the change in the handball law. Because you can now pay the ball with the top part of your arm the outstretched arm played him offside. This was onside last season to the armpit. #CRYLEE Image
Robert Lewandowski just had this goal disallowed for a marginal offside by the VAR.

Offside & VAR is a major issue in most leagues, not just the Premier League.
#DerKlassiker Image
Here's another VAR "arm" offside from Spain a few weeks ago. Image
Read 4 tweets
26 Oct
It's the Monday VAR thread, which this week will no doubt bring on the hate.

Including:
- Sheffield United penalty process at Liverpool
- Maguire vs. Azpilicueta
- Disallowed Arsenal goal
- Monitor use recap
- And more
Starting with Sheffield United's penalty at Liverpool for Fabinho's foul on Oliver McBurnie.

Contrary to what was reported in some places, the tackle was reviewed. In fact, there were three possible outcomes available to the VAR, who was Andre Marriner.
Outcome 1: Free kick to Sheffield United - challenge adjudged outside the area

Outcome 2: Penalty to Sheffield United - challenge deemed inside the area and a foul

Outcome 3: Dropped ball to Alisson - challenge deemed inside the area and NOT a foul
Read 24 tweets
19 Oct
Here it is. The Monday VAR thread, offside special.

- What you're looking at / how it's done
- The true flaws in the system
- Why Mane offside correct (in process)
- Why law change made Van Dijk and Mane offside
- Upcoming automated offside
- PLUS: Pickford

It's long....
The first thing the VAR decides is the first point of contact of the pass on the ball.

Many scream about the frame rate without understanding the actual issue.

Frame rate doesn't mean it is not possible to make an accurate decision. However, it is inconsistent.
The correct frame for the first point of contact on the pass will almost always be clear to the VAR.

So when people say "that's not the correct frame, the ball has left the foot" it's not actually a problem of frame choice.

The problem is that the correct frame does not exist.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!