Since launch, @dydxprotocol has made $2.4M in fees at a 30% monthly growth rate.
But they have much bigger ambitions... π
"Our goal is to become one of the biggest exchanges in crypto, PERIOD. Not just one of the biggest *decentralized* exchanges." - @AntonioMJuliano
That's ambitious considering centralized exchanges are raking in *billions*. How do they plan to pull this off?
1/x
At a time when DeFi automated market maker (AMM) like @UniswapProtocol are overtaking volumes on industry giants like @coinbase, dYdX is sticking to its guns:
"AMMs are good for long-tail assets, but we fat tail volumes are better for order books"
2/x
Exchanges are a volume game. To drive volumes, dYdX is focusing on pushing out the most popular financial contract in crypto: the $BTC perpetual swap
Since launch, dYdX has transacted over $1.5B so far.
3/x
But let's face it - if you're moving large volumes, it's easier to use centralized order book exchanges like FTX or Binance. It's cheaper, faster, and oftentimes more liquid.
But compared to 2018 when dYdX was one of the few projects around, the DeFi margin trading landscape is getting more competitive as well - @ProjectSerum is building on @solana, @synthetix_io is building on @optimismPBC.
If you spend anytime thinking about the above questions, @AntonioMJuliano and I dive deep into each of the topics above in this week's episode of @theBlockcrunch.
One strange thing I noticed in myself in the beginning of my career and among other young investors is the tendency to size too small on ideas with conviction, and size too big on ideas with lower conviction.
It's counterintuitive but it seems common.
1/x
"Dammit I should have sized bigger! I had a strong thesis. I don't know why I didn't."
"Why did I bet so much on this? It's all XXX's fault for fomo'ing me into this."
Statements like this are manifestations of the above.
2/x
Synthesizing the AMM vs. CLOB debate going on currently.
These are unrefined thoughts and there are much more informed MMs, LPs, devs out there than me.
So feel free to tell me if I miss anything!
1/ First:
I think it's important to think of what you can/cannot do with either to figure out what the USP is for both. Apples to oranges if compare AMM IL with CLOB spreads.
2/ AMM's gamechanging feature #1 is anyone can be a market maker + earn passive fees!
Most people who fit the LP profile probably don't care too much about IL unless asset prices diverge significantly over time, in which case fees need to be sufficient to cover.
Short sellers have been getting a lot of flack on Twitter lately.
While I'm bullish about crypto/ DeFi, here's a devil's advocate take on shorting 101 and why it's not as evil as crypto twitter make it seem to be.
Obviously not financial advice, just personal opinions.
1/ There are a lot of misconceptions about shorting. It's seen as "manipulative", even "evil".
In a space where most retails are long-biased and only want number to go up, shorting is seen as something conniving and devious hedge funds and traders do to "screw over" retails.
1/ First let's set the stage: August has been a phenomenal month for DeFi bulls.
Now we're in the hangover phase of the DeFi party, with the DeFi perp on @FTX_Official pretty much completely retracing the August froth back to square one.
2/ Amidst the rout, there's clear signs of flight to quality in yield farming.
Despite the modest returns of "only" 20-30% APY, Uniswap accounts for ~70% of all TVL in yield farms even as a new farm.