There are few people more predictable and boring than the professional contrarian.
This made me think about all the other types of people I find insufferable. So here's a thread.
The social media ironist: this person is invincible because nothing means anything and everything is permissible because its "mere irony". Opinions without the burden of responsibility.
Irony is a potent rhetorical tool used in moderation, not when it becomes the default mode.
The "free speech" liberal.
Doesn't have any strong opinions on more fundamental rights, but is an absolutist on free speech and thinks the only measure of its vitality is if you can test it against the sensitivities of people in inferior positions.
The journalist who confuses Twitter for Tinder. Has an attitude that is both knowing and ostentatiously modest. Makes wry comments using the mock heroic form about trivial things (beer, socks, nutella, etc) to imply he is above naive idealism. "I don't take myself too seriously"
Anyone who retweets Thomas Chatterton Williams.
The identity politics entrepreneur. Both types:
1—Lays exclusive claim to certain social & political domains by virtue of identity; renders all politics as identity politics.
2—Uses identity as a license ("speaking as an X") to dismiss identity as a factor in varied experience
White person with #FreePalestine#BLM#ACAB & a red rose in their bio who also admires Bashar al Assad, the man who besieged, tortured & killed Palestinians in Yarmouk, hosted Euro-Nazis, &voversees a secret police apparatus that executed 13K unarmed protestors in just one prison
The inveterate whatabouter.
They comes in all shades—left/right; imperialist/anti-imperialist; zionist/anti-zionist; Islamist/anti-Islamist. They raise human rights abuses in one place only insofar as it helps them whatabout human rights abuses in another place.
The diaspora nationalist.
Comes from a repressive state, positions himself as a dissident in the west, lives & speaks without fear—but uses his new freedoms to disparage dissidents back home as subversives for seeking the right to live & speak without fear.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm reading Barack Obama's memoir and appreciating his skill as a writer in making tedious details about his life during his political ascent readable. The book is an indulgent humblebrag about a presidency that would be viewed dimly if weren't for the horror of what followed.
He is a likeable person and his personally story is certainly compelling. But the book also reveals all the character flaws that led to a presidency lacking in boldness and imagination. The description of how he chose his economic team is particularly grating.
Obama wanted to appear "responsible" so he thought he'll go with the safe choice, so he went with the Bill Clinton team, the same guys who had championed the Glass-Steagall Act that contributed to the financial crisis. He describes Larry Summers misogyny as an endearing trait.
I loved this story by my friend @kshaheen. Loved the idea of a bookshop run by a Syrian for Syrians in exile. Loved the photos. Alas, by the time I visited, the bookshop had closed down.
Tonight's debate was a horrible but revealing spectacle. If anyone is undecided after tonight, it's because they are indifferent to the issues. The contrast on stage could not have been starker. There was only one bully, liar, and opportunist on stage. #debates
I doubt anyone who watched today's debate switched from Biden to Trump. But it's very likely the less rabid of Trump's supporters rethought their choice. @JoeBiden came across as dignified, reasonable, substantive, and, where necessary, cutting. #Debate2020
Biden had some good lines. "It is what it is because he is who he is" was good. And "Law and order, with justice" was the best. #Debate2020
A short thread in praise of @Showtime's "The Comey Rule". As a political sociologist and a film geek, I watched with a critical eye, but I think @BillyRay5229 has created an outstanding political drama.
I have read the memoirs that have come out of the Trump administration. I have read Comey, McCabe, Bolton, the Mueller report, and also investigative works including the two Woodward books, the two Michael Wolff books, Greg Miller, Corn and Isikoff, and Leonig and Rucker.
When you are that immersed in a political period, it generally sets you up for disappointment when it comes to fictional portraits. Everyone film or drama about the Bush administration was underwhelming or awful.
You won't be surprised that Bashar al Assad's leading American apologists is now sharing material from the far right dirty tricks outfit Project Veritas (see Washington Posts expose on this nasty group)
Dear @tmorello: I love you very much but I hope you realise how offensive it is to the victims of genocide when you amplify a professional propagandist for a fascist regime that the UN has charged with the "crime of extermination".
Don't you think its ironic to be using the mouthpiece for a regime that executed 13,000 unarmed protestors at just one prison over a period of 5 years to make some point about injustice? bbc.com/news/world-mid…
We are talking about a regime that practices torture on industrial scale. How insular does one's politics have to get to start seeing a mouthpiece for such a regime as an ally? hrw.org/news/2015/12/1…