You've got it wrong @menakadoshi. The arguments are ON MERIT. The rich-poor and middlemen-farmer pointers are part of the logical rebuttals.
The bills are for farmer welfare. They obviously affect those who benefit from exploiting the current system, abusing farmers' rights. +
The bills are for farmer welfare. They obviously affect those who benefit from exploiting the current system, abusing farmers' rights. +
https://twitter.com/menakadoshi/status/1334132298900377601
Now, who are those that exploit and abuse? Middlemen and rich farmers. Middlemen by controlling the prices of the produce and rich farmers by exploiting MSPs. It's no secret how middlemen benefit from the uneven market and only a handful rich farmers from the mandi-msp infra. +
That's where the middlemen-rich farmers rebuttal stems from.
Is it wrong/bad to be a agent/middleman or a rich farmer? Of course not. But it IS wrong to benefit from unjust practices and exploitation of the poor. +
Is it wrong/bad to be a agent/middleman or a rich farmer? Of course not. But it IS wrong to benefit from unjust practices and exploitation of the poor. +
The new system is giving a way out, an alternative to the current downtrodden. Current powerful structure is opposing the change.
There you go. Rebuttal on merit. Hope this helps.
There you go. Rebuttal on merit. Hope this helps.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
