Had a very troubling —harrowing— but brief conversation with someone who works with the families of EJK victims. I asked some questions and got disturbing answers... (A thread)
I asked if liquidations were continuing and got the impression they not only continue but have even accelerated. I asked, why? Answer: because for the first time the top leadership of police has no qualms demanding and expecting it be done. In the past, it was still clandestine.
A further answer: the top leader of police was precisely appointed because of enthusiasm for this task; so much so that entire classes (more than one) and thus a significant number, of more senior police were skipped over to make this appointment. This has supposedly riled up...
a couple of PMA classes in both the military and police (but this is an oft-told tale and one wonders what careerists will actually do about it). The point is that with media attention muted at best and the public remaining both tolerant and even welcoming (in principle if not...
practice). All the more that liquidations are unimpeded. Are there purges then within ranks of cops? Answer was yes which ties in with what I’ve heard elsewhere, previously; cops against liquidations had declined promotions or gone on study leave at first. After midterms they...
were identified and drummed out of the police for their low key opposition. With this top-down focus on liquidations, was there a kind of revival of the Japanese Occupation where personal scores were settled by acting as informants against personal enemies, I asked? The reply...
was yes, but in such cases it would require the connivance of the local chief of police. But this suggests the tremendous power such chiefs now wield with absolutely no recourse against them on the part of institutions or individuals. I can only hope there remain investigative...
journalists who can look into the current situation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ahead of #BonifacioDay a thread of readings and some other things like maps and music. First, Monumento: why is it, where it is, why does it have that design, what does it represent in our national imagination? officialgazette.gov.ph/bonifacio-150/
Note on that Princess Margaret/Imelda scene in The Crown: background is princess collected seashells; when Madame whisked her away to see “shells” it showed her having done her research on guest plus her heavy-handed Imeldific hospitality. For real-life accounts see these books.
An excerpt from Lady Glenconner's book:
You're best off with Caroline Kennedy's savage write ups on IRM and friends. 1. One Little Girl, a meditation of sorts, on Madame. anywhereiwander.com/2012/05/24/one…
This reminds me of what an archaeologist told me about how to understand prehispanic polities or chiefdoms. We have to understand it not in a strictly territorial sense but from the perspective of toll. Yes, toll. The chiefs held sway over groups of people and claimed exclusive..
authority to exact toll from commerce/trade/travel through their area of authority, perhaps their portion of a river or a land area with high traffic. In dealing with Westerners different attitudes collided: chiefs “ceding” land actually ceded tolls and influence, but not...
clearly demarcated titles to land in the Western sense, which is why chiefs could do it not only seemingly so easily, but repeatedly. This was beyond the comprehension of Westerners (to be precise: not in their interest to recognize this of course).
Why the story of The Two Speakers has October 5, the public release of the SWS Survey results, as the dividing line between Cayetano Triumphant and Velasco Ascendant. A thread. Before and up to October 5, Cayetano had torn up term-sharing, and left the Pres. w/ a done deal.
The cliques of the Ruling Coalition had gone to the Palace on September 29. By all accounts, the President signaled the agreement should be upheld.
Using a tried-and-tested parliamentary maneuver, what Cayetano did was call for a vote of confidence by offering to resign --a vote of confidence he won on September 30.
A thread for the law literalists. True as it goes except in legislatures the world over, tradition and past precedents are very powerful; but like all tradition, only as powerful as the shared belief of legislators in the power of those traditions.
This is why I've come to believe that term limits are more useful in executive positions but actually harmful to sober and effective legislation when applied to the legislature: good parliamentary procedure and mature lawmaking requires time and seasoning that term limits end...
up subverting. So you have what we have increasingly had, ever-more-reckless leadership fights, among other things. Even more than executive positions where leadership changes signal changing priorities due to new mandates, legislation requires institutional memory and a sense...
So today it seems battle's joined with two separate sessions claiming to be the authentic House special session. Here's some context: look at ratios of deputy speakers, and blocs each group possesses, to assess their relative strengths. NPC's pro-Velasco; Lakas suddenly neutral?
Cayetano's coalition was NP (40 votes), NUP (43 votes), Lakas (19 votes), Iglesia; Velasco's, PDP-Laban (61 v.) and HNP (aka Hugpong 3 v.), with NPC (32 v.) announcing it would back him in this current battle, and Lakas saying it would attend to budget first before speakership.
In public statements Lakas (via Martin Romualdez) was most subtle: saying they would focus on passing the budget thus being publicly loyal to the letter; while not pledging to support any other candidate which suggests maintaining status quo (Cayetano).