@jlmcardle01 & @DohrmanC provide an outstanding take on future of military readiness through synthetic environments. This could change the game in the techno-cognitive confrontation with China and Russia.

warontherocks.com/2020/12/the-ne…
China and Russia both see this confrontation as central to defeating the US armed forces if war occurs. It will occur across domains and command structures. It will require personnel who can make quick, accurate decisions under duress with imperfect information.
Given the increasing salience of new warfighting domains like space, cyberspace, and the EMS, along with the increasing interactions between these domains, real-world training for this sort of decision making has become impossible or cost-prohibitive.
We've like reached a point where we can't train realistically in meatspace alone. We have to move to a mix of live and synthetic environs to train our minds effectively. And this only becomes more important for incorporation and training of AI.
Technological capabilities and operational concepts are fascinating and important. However, it takes people (and possibly bots) to operate those capabilities and execute those concepts. We need new methods to train them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christopher M. Dougherty

Christopher M. Dougherty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @C_M_Dougherty

3 Dec
I'd like to share some thoughts from my recent @CNASdc #nextNDS paper on "Moving Beyond A2/AD," or Anti-Access/Area-Denial as an organizing concept. 👇🏻
cnas.org/publications/c… 1/20
This paper grew out of 1) the increasing mismatch between the A2/AD concept and emerging threats, 2) its misrepresentation of operational challenges, and 3) its misapplication to Russian military strategy as outlined by @KofmanMichael et al. 2/20
For years A2/AD focused thinking on Chinese threats to U.S. military operations in East Asia. The evolution of these threats strained its conceptual bounds. The phrase became an "intellectual junk drawer," into which DoD planners threw all aspects of the China problem. 3/20
Read 20 tweets
31 Jul
A thread on the recent news of DoD's withdrawal of ~12k troops from Germany: thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3… 1/25
I arrived at the Pentagon in late 2014, as DoD's response to Russia's invasion of Crimea and eastern Ukraine was ramping up after decades in which Russia had been an afterthought (at best) in DoD strategy and planning. 2/25
It's tough to describe the state of DoD's thinking about Russia in 2014, but the best term is shambolic. Nearly every part of DoD--OSD, JS, DIA, EUCOM, the Services--had allowed their Russia-focused staff and thinking to atrophy. 3/25
Read 25 tweets
28 Mar
It’s the final round of @CNASdc’s wargame looking at #airpower in the context of a China-Taiwan warfight in 2030.
Just to reiterate, this scenario and all actions taken within the game are notional.
Read 25 tweets
27 Mar
Now for Round Three of @CNASdc’s wargame looking at #airpower in the context of a China-Taiwan warfight in 2030.

@mack0352 @edmcgrady @Molly_Parrish @JessieDietz5 @SusannaVBlume
Just to reiterate, this scenario and all actions taken within the game are notional.
Read 15 tweets
27 Mar
As promised, Round 2 of @CNASdc’s remote wargame looking at #airpower in the context of a China-Taiwan warfight, but first a quick recap of yesterday’s events.

@mack0352 @edmcgrady @SusannaVBlume @evanbmontgomery @JessieDietz5
The purpose of this game is to develop new ways of fighting which will be necessary to deter and compete with China long term, as former Deputy Secretary of Defense Bob Work and I describe here: cnas.org/publications/v…
Developing a New American Way of War and associated capabilities is just the defense portion of a whole-of-nation competition with China that will shape U.S. foreign policy in the 21st century.
Read 17 tweets
26 Mar
Today @CNASdc Defense Team is hosting a remote wargame looking #airpower in a China-Taiwan conflict in 2030.
This is a key strategic challenge in the #NDS, as I described in my 2019 report: cnas.org/publications/r…
The focus of this series of games is on developing new operational concepts as I described last year in a policy brief for Congress: cnas.org/publications/c…
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!