Following the launch of @AaveAave v2, an ARC has been posted to gather feedback around proposed Safety Module design. This includes:
👉 Slashing
👉 Incentives for stakers
👉 BPT staking
For his first daily, our new analyst @JonathanErlichL discusses these changes
Thread
👇
Slashing and staking incentives are essential parts of the SM and we didn't spend much time on these
Instead, we focus on the more controversial point of introducing allowing SM stakers to stake 80/20 $AAVE / $ETH pool BPT tokens in addition to $AAVE
We argue this is a necessary change, breaking the vicious cycle that can emerge as a result of Shortfall Events
Price falls --> Traders try to front-run $AAVE auction / mint --> Price declines more --> auction/mint gets more expensive
While it is impossible to estimate what the precise effect on price a shortfall event would have, looking at the past can help
Token prices have been aggressively hit (-18 to -53%) immediately following the hacks.
Crucially, none of these had native token backed insurance funds or mints. As such, the price impact of a shortfall event on $AAVE could be even greater
Adding uncorrelated, low volatility assets to the SM is an important step in breaking this vicious cycle
$ETH is an asset that presents low-to-moderate correlation to $AAVE (0.56) and consistently lower volatility
Note that the SM will still be highly exposed to Aave as the 80/20 pool means even if 50% of stakers stake BPT shares, the SM will be 90% AAVE. At 100% BPT shares, it will still be 80% AAVE
With the launch of governance v2, we look forward to proposals implementing stablecoins and other assets
We are also working on v2 of our aDAO proposal which will propose an intermediate step between the current SM and the aDAO model. Stay tuned for this 👀
On November 10th, @Delphi_Digital put forth a proposal for to fundamentally revise @AaveAave's current token architecture
We received incredible feedback from the community and are thrilled to present V2 of our proposal which incorporates much of this insight
Thread👇
1/ Before diving into our proposal it's important to understand how the current Aave Safety Module (SM) works
The SM is an insurance product which underwrites all risks (SC, oracle and liquidation) for all users of Aave protocol
As an insurance product, it has a few flaws
2/ Because insurance is bundled in with Aave's money markets, it's impossible to compute cover demand, pricing, capacity or how much to pay underwriters
Any new money market added is also automatically insured by the SM, introducing unlimited contagion and systemic risk
1/9 I believe most DeFi credit protocols like will end up creating their own insurance pool underwritten by tokenholders. Why?
🔸Gives governors skin in the game and an incentive to make good decisions
🔸Better product for users who want insurance as they deposit
2/9
🔸Transforms idle market cap into balance sheet, generating fees
🔸Risks can be bundled into products and offered to users based on their particular preferences
3/9 While we believe this makes a lot of sense as a token model, we don't think it is competitive but rather complementary to @NexusMutual
This is because insurance relies on leverage to be efficient and leverage requires diversified, uncorrelated risk exposures
1/ Today, after 1 month of working closely with the @AragonProject team and community, our proposal to buyout $ANJ holders who lock their converted $ANT for 12 months was voted in at a conversion price of 0.044ANT/ANJ ($0.138 at current prices)
2/ This represents an excellent outcome for $ANJ holders who only 8 weeks ago were being forced to sell at 0.015 ANT ($0.05 at current prices)
The price of $ANJ has already reacted, up over 100% in the hours since the vote
3/ While this process has had its share of hiccups along the way, we’re proud of $ANT holders for listening to the $ANJ community, paying a multiple that appropriately reflects the commitment made by $ANJ holders and the upside given up via merging into $ANT
As someone who is #irresponsiblylong both Bitcoin and DeFi, I cannot understand the constant tensions and bickering between the communities
In yesterday's daily, I explore why I believe Bitcoin and DeFi are symbiotic rather than competitive
Thread 👇
1/11 Bitcoin can be seen as "Digital Gold", with its like for like characteristics as a store of value being superior in every way
However, it's also much more than this as it's natively digital nature enables programmability, utility and financial innovation at software speed
2/ Bitcoin is not only a financial asset that is no one else’s liability, it can also be used as part of a broader financial system without becoming someone else’s liability
Rather than trust a counterparty, users need only trust cryptoeconomic incentives and human greed
While my time investing in crypto and previously playing poker has gotten me used to experiencing large daily personal net worth volatility, it's never a pleasant experience
Short thread (by my standards...) with some ramblings that help me get through it 👇
1/10 Imo, some DeFi projects represent 10-1000x upside opportunities
Obviously, like all of crypto, it is extremely risky and can go to 0. That said, given the magnitude of potential outcomes, it just doesn't have to succeed that often to make it a massively +EV bet
2/10 As with all early stage tech, realising these outcomes will require 4-8 year holds
Unlike early stage tech, crypto investors will have liquidity, i.e. the possibility, and thus the temptation, to sell