Tweet

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @StephanieKelton

Stephanie Kelton

@StephanieKelton

4 Dec

Short thread

Anyone who has been paying attention knows that what we’re hearing from a number of economists today was laid out more forcefully more than a decade ago by those they prefer to ignore.

@stf18

What, eg, did Blanchard discover that wasn’t already written up by @stf18 in 2006? papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Mainstream econ has arrived at the position that we’re probably OK as long as CBO forecasts re: the future path of interest rates is off. MMT asserts that the future path is a policy choice.

Read 5 tweets

Stephanie Kelton

@StephanieKelton

21 Nov

MMT: The Clock that Keeps on Ticking

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…

I’ll put the MMT record up against the stopped clock mainstream Keynesian record any day. Exhibit A brookings.edu/wp-content/upl…

If you’ve followed the headline Keynesians over the years, you know that they have twisted themselves into knots, trying to justify their ever-shifting views on fiscal sustainability.

They counseled Congress (and Obama) to steer clear of a bigger relief package, paving the way for an abysmal “recovery.” They leaned into Simpson Bowles and went on to warn that “A debt crisis is coming.” washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-deb…

Read 4 tweets

Stephanie Kelton

@StephanieKelton

27 Oct

I promise to stop when the battle is won. Until then, here’s another attempt to improve understanding and shift our broken thinking about government “deficits.”

THREAD

First, the word deficit. 🤦🏼‍♀️
It’s a terrible word because it suggests a shortfall.
A deficiency.
A problem.

It’s none of those things.

But that’s how we usually think of the word. Like when the announcer says, “If the Rays are going to come back and win this game, they’re going to need to overcome a three-run deficit against the Dodgers.”

The team with the deficit loses the game.

Read 14 tweets

Stephanie Kelton

@StephanieKelton

14 Oct

I recently heard someone refer to MMT as “dangerous.” It is upsetting to those who prefer to stay nestled in the conventional discourse, where it is acceptable to change one’s answers to age-old questions but not to challenge the questions themselves. 1/4

Thus, “How much does the government *need* to tax vs borrow to pay for its spending?” can be answered differently by “reasonable” people. 2/4

Dangerous people change the questions: “What is the purpose of taxing and borrowing, and when/why should a currency-issuing government *choose* to do more of either?” 3/4

Read 4 tweets

Stephanie Kelton

@StephanieKelton

25 Sep

https://twitter.com/fixthedebt/status/1309310974768418818

What a load of utter garbage. These people are truly dangerous.

https://twitter.com/fixthedebt/status/1309310974768418818

One of the worst ideas imaginable.

What a joke. The current crisis demonstrates exactly the opposite—i.e. that nothing you’ve carped on about has mattered one bit, nor did decades of rising debt and deficits prevent Congress from combating the COVID recession.

Read 4 tweets

Stephanie Kelton

@StephanieKelton

20 Sep

A thread (1/21)

Let's talk about the "deficit" that isn't. The conventional way to talk about the government's fiscal position is to look at the difference between how much money the Government spends (G) and how much it collects via Taxation (T).

G > T means the government is spending more than it collects in tax payments. Convention has us refer to this as a fiscal "deficit."

G < T means the government is spending less than it collects in tax payments. Convention has us call this a fiscal "surplus."

Standard definitions of a "deficit" include:

Read 22 tweets

Share this page!

Stephanie Kelton

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @StephanieKelton

Stephanie Kelton

Stephanie Kelton

Stephanie Kelton

Stephanie Kelton

Stephanie Kelton

Stephanie Kelton

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Like this author's thread?