6) You know what, I didn't get the line breaks right, did I? This one is important enough to correct, I believe. So I'm going to go do that right now. There we go!
7) It doesn't matter that much, but if you're going to RT one, that last one above is the best. RTing is not my real objective. Rather, I hope to inspire you to push this brief forward in your own way, with your own thoughts and words. We need the world to know where we stand.
10) That's what I'm talking about. We patriots must seize the apparent advantage the other side has stolen. It is often in the very moment of apparent victory that an enemy is at his weakest. The will to fight has surrendered to the will to celebrate.
11) The key in this #Overturn mission is the clear knowledge that we did not lose. We won an overwhelming landslide victory and they believe that their theft has gone safe, scottfree safe. I have a FOX update on that count I'll give in a moment.
12) The power of the brief is that it answers the question: where's the data. I don't mean strategically or tactically at law. I need @shestokas to help me with the law. Maybe my new friend @PubliusHuldah might weigh in! I read this brief very differently.
13) I have no idea how SCOTUS will rule, and no real idea of the legal basis of the document. That is, I can't, I don't have the ability, to read it with the law itself in mind, and with its persuasive legal force at question. I'm not trained that way.
14) The mindset I bring to its reading is simply as evidence. And I don't mean evidence at law. I mean just evidence as any person might consider it with no legal frame of reference at all. There is evidence here. Evidence matters.
15) I have NO intention of persuading any of my many wonderful, patriot Democrat friends with this evidence. None. I do have, however, the joy of offering it to them for their consideration when they smack me for...
Lack Of Evidence
Ha! They won't read it, I know. But still!
16) I'm not a scientist, but I'm a bit closer to being one than I am of being a lawyer. In science we have a term: Proof Of Possibility. We can reject anything that fails to produce such proof. There's a famous example of this.
17) It was believed that all swans were white. The statement, therefore, that there are No Black Swans, was obviously permitted. Except, well, until someone found a black swan. All it took was just that one. It completely disproved the All White Swans theory. Boom! Proof.
18) It is with that mindset that I read the brief. I'm looking for evidence. I don't care if it is legally compelling or not. I do NOT forecast SCOTUS rulings. I do care about evidence. This brief 100% defeats the "there is no evidence" lie.
19) Let us look at the presentation of evidence as if it were a tactical mandate. You have no case at law if you have no evidence. No one would dream to mount a case with none. Every case has evidence, or there is no case. Even I know that.
20) And in some cases, like the Only White Swans case, the evidence is so conclusive that it is literally case over. Most evidence is NOT quite so conclusive. Most evidence must be interpreted. Most people don't realize, the word "interpreted" basically means "theory."
21) I'm not sure why, but the word "theory" has a bad reputation. There is a maxim out there about this:
In theory, theory works. In the real world, it doesn't.
This is an idiotic and completely false statement, but many believe it.
22) There is a counter I offer:
In practice, theory is required. Without theory all practice is both stupid and idiotically incompetent.
We to have a theory of the election. What happened is NOT merely a factual question, it is also theoretical. We have to have our theory.
23) Where our brief gives us so much on that path, there is another document I will be reading and re-reading with luxurious slowness. I've offered it before. Here it is again now:
24) It took me over an hour to snag everything in this document by screenshots and here's the last one I took, yesterday. The red numbers on the left are my count of the paragraphs, all 61 of them.
25) Homework. It never ends for the patriot who demands mind first, action second. Remember:
Knowledge => Action
Certain Knowledge => Unstoppable Action
J.E. Dyer gives us theory. Hugely important theory. Her 61 paragraphs matter.
"Republican establishment cowards who refuse to confront and defeat the election fraud don’t seem to understand the consequences of their refusal to man up and fight the fraud.
27) "Our Country is right now in the process of being overthrown and taken over by profoundly evil people. You better fight while we still can."
@PubliusHuldah gives us the pragmatic theoretical framework by which we may derive both tactics and strategies.
29) As we've done a great deal of work on @PubliusHuldah's article, there's only a little left. As to the brief and @OptimisticCon's work, we still have a long way to go.
Alas.
30) As I've said, there's no rest for the righteous. Here's the homework (above) and we need to do it.
See you tomorrow friends, with more homework done...
Thread ends at #30.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You're going to hear the the Electoral College has voted Joe Biden POTUS 46 today. That Trump's attack against the sanctity of a democratic election has failed. But I will still patiently wait.
2) Why will I patiently wait? First, because I know the power, reach, and corruption of the lying liars who are still working feverishly to steal a landslide election away from us. We The People of America chose @realDonaldTrump as our President. It was a landslide.
3) As all the media outlets tell you we're all done, Notorious Joe is POTUS 46, don't believe them yet. In all the analysis I've seen, the only date that matters is the inauguration. Between now and then, I await guidance from @GenFlynn and @realDonaldTrump.
We're Sticking with J.E. Dyers, Wherever She Leads Us!
Yesterday, I thought I'd pick up at paragraphs 13 & 14 of her article, but I realize, we must recommence with 10 - 12 shown here.
2) We dive in again with paragraph 12:
"And the evidence of tampering, the basis for suspicion and the need for forensic audits, are convincing. This isn’t about a few votes cast by the deceased.
3) "It’s about unconstitutional rules-changing in swing states days before the general election, which facilitated the lawless admission of thousands of “mail-in” ballots after statutory deadlines
2) If you're like me, you need to know the source and read it in full. To that end, here is the article. Be ready to stretch your mind. You'll be required to parse strategy from tactics, and how each relates to the other.
3) "This is the main effort because it addresses the foundational threat: a direct attack, via election fraud, on the “social contract” and the compact of government between man and the state."
It is on me. It is on you. It is on us to declare our non-surrender.
I have much more to study from the "BRIEF OF STATE OF MISSOURI AND 16 OTHER STATES AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT."
2) My most important point is, again, that YOU can read it. You can study and comprehend its every point. Law is for ALL of us, not for the elite few.
3) I apologize that you might have to look at my Twitter feed to see the work I've been doing on the legal brief. As I so often do, I start out with the conclusion. There are 16 pages left from introduction through middle, that I haven't commented upon, yet.
What makes an innocent man plead guilty? There is a lie in America. The lie is that Judges, Courts, Prosecutors are honest. They prosecute for Justice, we're told. They do not.
2) I certainly did not know how to interpret Obama's attack against Flynn on November 10, 2016. I also had no idea how to deal with the transition itself. All of us who gave everything we had to the campaign had no clue what to do with victory. We hadn't thought about it.
3) Not that we hadn't thought about victory. It was our every thought for months and months. We thought about nothing else. Inside that nothing else was what to do with victory once we had it. Not a clue. Not a thought. Certainly, I didn't.
2) The band was in disguise, but my 16-year old sister spotted them, knew them, and ran right up to them. She bribed them on the spot. She said, "You can talk to me and my mom and brother, or I'll start screaming that you're you." It was the coolest thing she ever did.
3) Geniuses that they were, they knew their gig was up, and complied with my mighty sister. Then, a problem arose. Jim started talking to me as opposed to her. I was 9, and dressed up like the complete square that I was. Wrong plaids combined. Short hair. Etcetera.