Gro-Tsen Profile picture
10 Dec, 9 tweets, 3 min read
A claim has been brought to my attention that covid has cut life expectancy in England and Wales by a year. I think this is EXTRAORDINARILY misleading, so it deserves some clarification. •1/9 theguardian.com/world/2020/dec…
The thing is, life expectancy (at birth, or at any other age) is a bizarre notion. It is obtained by taking observed death rates by age at a given time (generally averaged over several years), assuming these rates stay constant, and computing expectancy from that. •2/9
So it's a concept which basically embeds the assumption that death rates hold constant over time. Which isn't true, of course. When they vary slowly (e.g., due to medical progress), it still makes sense. But in the face of an extraordinary even like covid? •3/9
Now what this preprint (‌medrxiv.org/content/10.110…‌) just does, if I understand it correctly, is take the mortality profile of 2020 and use it to compute a life expectancy (and compare it to a similar one without covid). •4/9
In other words, what they are doing (by just using the 2020 death profile) amounts to ASSUMING THAT COVID-19 WILL CAUSE THE SAME DEATH PROFILE EVERY YEAR FROM NOW ON and computing the reduction in life expectancy from that assumption. •5/9
Now I do not believe that it any reasonable person would naturally interpret “covid-19 has cut life expectancy by one year” by understanding “if it is extended into perpetuity”. You tend to think of it as a one-off thing, as covid is believed to be. •6/9
So you might ask: then what IS the life expectancy loss for covid if it's just one-off? But the thing is, it's hard to define what the life expectancy loss of a one-off event means: “life expectancy” only has meaning in a stationary situation (see above). •7/9
What we CAN compute, instead, is the number of expected life years lost due to covid, and divide by the population. I didn't do the computation for the UK, but in France, the average life expectancy based on age&gender of covid deaths is about 11.1yr. •8/9
So if we multiply by the number of deaths and divide by the French population, we get… 3.4 days of life lost per person on average (so far!). I think this is far more meaningful than this “one year lost” computation which implicitly assumes covid will repeat every year. •9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gro-Tsen

Gro-Tsen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gro_tsen

11 Dec
🧵 A comparison between hydroxychloroquine and lockdowns. ⤵️

Recently I compared lockdown proponents with crackpots who believe 5G causes covid: I admit I shouldn't have written this. But the comparison with HCQ proponents, on the other hand, works very well. Thread: •1/36
Ⓐ So, first, in both cases we have something which is supposed to work against covid for a simple and not completely idiotic reason (i.e., the idea is, at least, worth considering!). •2/36
In the case of hydroxychloroquine (“HCQ” henceafter), the theory is that HCQ could serve as a zinc ionophore, transporting Zn²⁺ into the cytoplasm where it serves to inhibit viral ARN-replicase. •3/36
Read 36 tweets
8 Dec
I should probably write a preventive thread about this, because I feel I'm going to get a few comments of the kind “more than 60% in place <X> have been infected by covid, and infections are still taking place! this proves that herd immunity DOES NOT WORK! ChEcKmAtE!!!”. •1/24
So yes, I've claimed a number of times, and I still do, that the trivial estimation of the collective immunity threshold given by the formula 1 − 1/R, which gives 60% for R=2.5, is pessimistic (but that it's hard to figure out the true value). •2/24
This is essentially because the reasoning behind this formula assumes a homogeneous population (everyone is equally likely to get infected) with perfect mixing (everyone is equally likely to infect anyone) and deviations from this lower the threshold. •3/24
Read 24 tweets
7 Dec
Extremely disappointed by this move of Dylan's. As a recipient of the Nobel Prize in literature, he should understand what value his songs have for humanity as a whole, and consider giving them to mankind by emancipating them into the Public Domain.
bbc.com/news/entertain…
Instead, he preferred to keep them locked under copyright for many decades to come, by selling them in exchange for a large sum of money to a predatory company. What cultural, artistic or social values was Dylan supposed to stand for, again? The times they aren't a-changin'!
This is particularly disappointing given that D. himself recognized the value of imitating others (and was criticized for doing so). From his Nobel speech: “By listening to all the early folk artists and singing the songs yourself, you pick up the vernacular. You internalize it.”
Read 4 tweets
29 Nov
Je viens de regarder l'épisode de la série “Quand l'Histoire fait dates” consacré à la bataille de Talas en 751: arte.tv/fr/videos/0861… — je dois avouer mon inculture (et/ou mon européo-centrisme) en ce que je n'avais pas entendu parler de la bataille de Talas… •1/6
… Du moins jusqu'à la semaine dernière, parce que j'ai appris son importance justement avant-hier, ce qui m'a permis de dire à mon poussinet «quoi? tu ne connaissais pas la bataille de Talas‽ j'en parlais justement avant-hier avec ta mère». 😅 •2/6
Ceci dit, l'importance de la bataille semble un peu disputée. Patrick Boucheron, dans cette émission, en fait une date-clé dans le développement des deux empires musulman et chinois et dans l'histoire de l'Asie centrale, et même dans la conversion des Turcs à l'Islam. •3/6
Read 6 tweets
28 Nov
Je viens de regarder la troisième partie, qui est aussi très intéressante (quoique un peu moins que la deuxième). •1/10
Il y est question des langues qui ont changé d'alphabet, à commencer par le turc, par décision d'Atatürk, mais aussi l'Ouzbek (arabe traditionnellement, puis latinisation à partir de 1928, puis cyrillique à partir de 1940, et maintenant retour à l'alphabet latin). •2/10
Mais aussi des tentatives de latiniser le chinois, avec le «Latinxua Sin Wenz» dans les années 1930 (je n'en avais jamais entendu parler). Par contre, bizarrement, le documentaire parle peu de la simplification des idéogrammes chinois. •3/10
Read 10 tweets
27 Nov
Très intéressant documentaire diffusé par @ARTEfr, ‘L'Odyssée de l'écriture’, sur l'histoire de l'écriture, en trois parties (1 “Les origines”, 2 “L'Empreinte des civilisations” et 3 “Une nouvelle ère”), visible sur leur site jusqu'au 19 janvier: arte.tv/fr/videos/RC-0… •1/17
J'ai vu la première partie hier, qui est intéressante et très bien expliquée, sur les origines de l'écriture d'une part, et de l'alphabet de l'autre. Mais je n'y ai pas appris grand-chose de plus que ce que je savais déjà. Je n'ai pas encore vu la troisième partie. •2/17
Par contre, j'ai trouvé la deuxième partie absolument fascinante. Elle se penche sur les supports et techniques d'écriture entre l'antiquité et le développement de l'imprimerie à caractères mobiles et sur l'impact que ceux-ci ont eu. J'essaie de résumer: •3/17
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!