The United States has an ambitious plan to get to population level immunity, but it doesn't have the vaccines to accomplish it (no less the buy in of Americans)
@WSJgraphic by @ErikBrynildsen@joshulick@TaylorUmlauf @toddlindeman /1
Before the vaccine problems with Sanofi-GSK (wrong dose) and Astra Zeneca/Oxford (? dose) the US was already short in covering its population nature.com/articles/d4158… /2
Eventually we'll have enough vaccines. But those with prior infections could be deferred. The problem is of the 60+ million people, confirmed infections were in 16 M. The rest were not tested or asymptomatic. What if we could accurately and rapidly determine serology status? /7
The problem with determining serostatus is the time from infection and false positives from current tests. If we had a rapid, accurate neutralizing antibody test or surrogate metric to support durable immune response, we could do this well /9
Another point that ironically helps us is that the proportion of the 60+ million infected (and >1 million/5 days now) is that 30-50% (w/ @youyanggu) will likely not opt to get the vaccine /10
Given vaccine supply issues, we need a smart strategy to accelerate our trajectory to herd immunity. An unmet need is a test that could provide guidance, which could also be used to verify a salutary immune response to the vaccines. /11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why 2 proline (P) substitutions will go down in history.
Introducing 2P's at the beginning of the central helix (CH) stabilized the spike protein's confirmation upon entering cells.
From the Jan 10 #SARSCoV2 sequence, this 2P Δ was incorporated into the mRNA vaccine designs /1
We have the FDA (VRBPAC) external view 77% affirmative vote.
Not sure what the 18% who voted no or 5% abstaining were thinking.
But expect final FDA EUA approval for the 1st vaccine for the US in a very short time. 👍👍👏👏
The "no" concerns about age 16-17 are not consistent with the protocol inclusion criteria, even though the number of participants < 18 were low.
The number of participants by age, 95 were age 16 or 17
It's the 3rd hump—its apex and duration yet unknown—that is breaking the backs of America's health workforce along with the nightmarish number of new infections and fatalities recorded each day.
adapted from @COVID19Tracking data