3 weeks removed from when people started gathering for Thanksgiving, let's see how those #COVID19 "surge upon a surge" predictions by Fauci etc panned out for those of us in the Midwest. Colored lines indicate each state's peak. They all occurred within one week of each other.
2/ The "surge upon a surge" narrative has no basis in reality. COVID outbreaks are clearly regional, regardless of the restrictions put in place by a particular state. This is perfectly obvious when you break out the regions one at a time vs. nationally.
3/ 4 states with some of the most lax COVID restrictions of this group of 9 have the highest decreases from their peak - ND, IA, SD and NE. Some of these states introduced new restrictions, mandates etc. but none of them align with when they peaked. Many came after.
4/ Every single state of this group of 9 has continued to see a decrease in cases since Thanksgiving. "Experts" in Iowa promised an apocalyptic post-Thanksgiving surge (a "tsunami", they called it). Yet here they are with the second biggest decrease.
5/ Even nationally, in a poetic turn of events, it appears ED visits for COVID-like illness (CLI) peaked on Thanksgiving day. A CLI peak has been a reliable leading indicator that case, hospitalization and death peaks are not far behind.
6/ What does this all mean? First of all, for 3 million Americans, COVID or not, 2020's Thanksgiving was their last. And thanks to widespread panic-induced headlines about the holiday, for many of those 3 million it was done through a low-res web camera, or worse - alone…
7/ …and it was all in service of trying to stop the spread of a virus that was largely predetermined anyway. Yet those that perpetuate fear and panic see no retribution for this. They move on to the next thing, whether it's cases spiking elsewhere or "long term effects".
8/ This leads to the question - how long do we allow these so-called experts to push lockdown policies that appear to have no effect on the overall trajectory of an outbreak? Do they continue to push these same failed policies over and over again out of self-preservation?
9/ How many more missed cancer diagnoses, how many more layoffs, how much more child neglect will we tolerate? And for what? To feed the fragile egos of career bureaucrats pushing policies motivated by political cowardice that is poorly disguised as morality? Enough is enough.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eric

Eric Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IAmTheActualET

15 Dec
Still waiting on that contact tracing data for KC restaurants and bars. What % of outbreaks can you trace to them? Why haven't you shared this when you have 9 months of data?

A well-documented anecdote (3 infections) does not mean this is happening everywhere all the time.
"Necessary curbs", @QuintonLucasKC says, but provides no specifics, no data for Kansas City to show why this is necessary. These are the actions of someone desperate to look like he's doing something even if it's not empirically driven.
Also, cases are decreasing in KC as they are throughout the rest of the Midwest. @QuintonLucasKC announced his "Safer at Home KC" measures on 11/16. Cases peaked around 11/10. His policies are so effective they work retroactively!
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
Anatomy of a standard #COVID19 response:
1. Recommend cancellation of elective procedures, causing financial strain on hospitals which in turn results in layoffs
2. Vastly overestimate the efficacy of masks and mask mandates, creating overreliance on unproven prevention methods
3. "Cases" eventually go up anyway (highly contagious+PCR tests), public officials blame the public for not "following the rules" re: masks
4. Layoffs from step 1 result in reduced number of beds that can be staffed when virus inevitably peaks, straining hospital workers
5. Media provide anecdotal horror stories of hospitals filling up but does not accurately reflect the big picture of the number of hospital beds available in an area
6. Virus spread eventually slows, regardless of what NPIs were put in place and at what time
Read 4 tweets
28 Sep
To illustrate why #COVID19 PCR testing is flawed, and why we need transparency on cycles from positive tests, here is a hypothetical: say someone took a $1 bill from me and claimed I was distributing cocaine. Most paper bills have over 0.1 micrograms. academic.oup.com/jat/article/20…
To help determine whether I was in possession of cocaine, my accuser has a machine that can multiply any trace amounts found on a dollar bill by two every cycle it ran. You could set it to any number of cycles - but let's say 40, to match the CDC guideline for #COVID19.
So, multiplying 0.1 micrograms by two 40 times is roughly 110,000 grams, or 110 kilograms, or 242 pounds. So the tiny, trace amounts of cocaine found on my $1 bill is now about the same weight as former NFL linebacker Luke Kuechly. I would be going to jail for a long time.
Read 8 tweets
23 Sep
Thinking about this Star Tribune article from May detailing how there are two ends to a pandemic: a “social” one and “medical” one. They quote some historians who theorize the social end may be before medical, but I think the opposite has actually happened m.startribune.com/pandemic-s-end…
The “social” end is when people just stop worrying about the disease. Clinical definitions may vary - but it’s clear COVID is no longer an enormous burden on our health care system. Hospitalizations are dropping drastically and have been for months at this point.
The renewed focus on “cases” using PCR tests that are far too sensitive and are not useful for diagnostic purposes this late in the game is artificially extending our “social” pandemic, as more useful indicators (hospitalizations and ED visits) continue to drop ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
9 Sep
1/ I'm seeing "heart issues related to #COVID19" making the rounds again on Twitter today - I have to admit, I just saw this study that found 48% of elite high-endurance athletes had myocardial inflammation post-infection. Yikes! (source below)
2/ Wait…what's this? This is from 2009? And it's about…the common cold? Not COVID-19? So strange…why haven't we stopped all sports for this? Surely athletes have been dying from cardiac inflammation since the beginning of time! This cannot stand!
jcmr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
3/ Dropping the facetious façade now…as I (and more importantly, cardiologists) have been saying all along, cardiac inflammation after an infection (particularly a bad one) is nothing new. It is why they say it's important to take it easy while you are sick and for a while after
Read 6 tweets
9 Sep
By instituting insane, unattainable "case per population" goals to get life back to normal you are indirectly incentivizing people who are actually sick to not seek proper care. People being very sick, but not wanting to contribute to everyone's imprisonment if they test COVID+
This isn't just for COVID but for other health problems as well. In Denver they showed while cardiac arrests went up, EMT runs went down. A study showed cancer diagnoses went down 50% in the US. Looking at @EthicalSkeptic's graph here you see cancer deaths are already rising. ImageImage
Hospitalizations are the key metric. If an asymptomatic 20-something tests positive for a PCR test, who cares? Studies show asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare. Not overwhelming the health care system was the goal and we've achieved it. Look at this graph. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!