Thought: Let's say a start up, like $FB back in the day, raised funding on a dodgy idea, let's say they got traction and the idea didnt look so dodgy so they raised more cash via equity but lets say they agree to an limit on the equity issuance. Is that wrong? XRP (no view).
So, right or wrong?
It is not so clear to me, with my limited knowledge at a macro level....
It is not so clear to me, with my limited knowledge at a macro level....
I also understand Ripple issued equity but Im not sure how totally different this is if you replace the worlds "cryptocurrency" with shares.
All thoughts appreciated. As I said, I have zero view but am not sure of the controversy at a macro level. XRP is being used at least...
All thoughts appreciated. As I said, I have zero view but am not sure of the controversy at a macro level. XRP is being used at least...
I think there are much dodger versions of this, who had no real intention of actually creating an ecosystem but its too soon for me to claim fraud.
Not everything however needs to look like BTC to have value (RP ducks as the hate pours in).
Not everything however needs to look like BTC to have value (RP ducks as the hate pours in).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
