@Ano3020100 Yes,but the increase in the SPS Liq Preference doesn't appear in the balance-sheet since the 1Q2018,because they are all SPS increased for free (FnF didn't get the cash). They do it in order to don't post its corresponding offset (reduction of Paid-In Capital/Retained Earnings)
@Ano3020100 $20.7b Sept 30,2020. If we post the true SPS in the bce sheet,along with their corresponding offset (reduction of Retained Earnings), we have that the NW is comprised for:
$16.5b SPS
$4.2b Retained Earnings
But,taking into account the $4.2b SPS on Dec 31,2020 + offset:
$20.7b SPS
@Ano3020100 So,I've adjusted the NW as of Sept w/ the SPS pending to be increased on Dec,in order to have a more accurate view of their current NW.
On Dec,the NW will be increased with the profits(unknown today)but it's imaginary,because there'll be pending SPS increased on March+its offset.
@Ano3020100 There's an offset because the money is not free. It has to come from somewhere when you hand out stocks for free.
If we take into account the SPS that will be increased at the end of the next quarter, this is always their Net Worth:
@Ano3020100 It looks to me like we witness a backdoor Nationalization through Securities/Fin Statement/Accounting Fraud+ violation of Law.#Trump's Bolivarian Revolution.#Fanniegate $FNMA @Scotus @SEC_Enforcement @FHFA @USTreasury @WhiteHouse @FSCDems @FinancialCmte @BankingGOP @SenateBanking
@Ano3020100 @Scotus @SEC_Enforcement @FHFA @USTreasury @WhiteHouse @FSCDems @FinancialCmte @BankingGOP @SenateBanking Many Justices accused @TheJusticeDept of carrying out a nationalization, instead of Conservatorship.
Now, Trump and his inner-circle begin a campaign to smear Scotus.
Scotus isn't a court to investigate the proofs or dismiss a lower Court's ruling per se.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Conservatives against Trump

Conservatives against Trump Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CarlosVignote

6 Dec 20
.@TheJusticeDept's SOLICITOR GNRL IS A SCAMMER
Shameful omnibus reply filed on Oct23 at @Scotus.
-To the Scotus-appointed amicus: he omits the Amicus' explanation of the Govt Implicit Gtee,which is the "special borrowing rights from UST.§1719(b)(c)"
Like a charlatan...#Fanniegate
...he twists the Amicus' take, who stressed the FHFA's limited Powers when acting as Conservator, but the Solicitor Gnrl refutes it signaling that the @FHFA's powers are significant, notwithstanding that he was enumerating all the powers of FHFA-R: enforce policies,overseer of...
...the mortgage mkt,etc).This is because he spent 10yrs stating that HERA grants the conservator unlimited powers("sweeping grant of powers"),something that the Professor slams.
-To the JPS holders, the Solicitor Gnrl replies that the FHFA didn't wield any Executive Power when...
Read 10 tweets
6 Dec 20
Another shameful VW's article paid by Pagliara,who erroneously claims that FnF are allowed to retain $25b of Capital Reserve. It's $45b(25 $FNMA),but FnF ARE NOT building Capital Reserve($0)but NW,since the new SPS reduce Retained Earnings.Liar!#Fanniegate @TheJusticeDept @Scotus
$0 is the Capital Reserve built since the 4th amnt,Dec2017.FnF built NW=$35b SPS
Core Capital on Sept2020:
$FNMA/ $FMCC:-$106b/-$60b
With the adjustment pending due to SPS missing,C.C.=$-123b/$-71.2b
With the SPS on Dec2020:$-127.2b/$-73.6b @TheJusticeDept
Evidence that FnF built $0 Capital Reserve since the 4th amndt.
The ending bce C.C. today in FMCC must coincide with the C.C. it had on the 1st quarter after the 4th amdmnt.
FMCC's C.C. today(w/ the SPS of Dec)=$-73.6b
1Q2018=$-70.2b -$3b SPS missing-$0.2b CECL adjustment=$-73.4b
Read 5 tweets
19 Nov 20
💥@FHFA THINKS IT CAN WAIVE HERA's RESTRICTION ON CAPITAL DISTRIBUTIONS BECAUSE IT SUSPENDED THE CAPITAL CLASSIFICATIONS IN 2008
Because the Restr,surprisingly,appears inside the Sec:Capital Classifications,whereas copycat FDI Act is an indep provision.#Fanniegate @TheJusticeDept
FHFA isn't empowered to suspend the application of statutory provisions.
Also,it can't approve(July2011)another exception to the same restriction,adding up(1)for Recap,primarily because Recap is achieved w/ the restriction itself(Retained Earngs)=Law intent.
Dtr,fired.@WhiteHouse
Clearly,it wasn't the FHFA's interpretation of the Restriction On Capital Distributions outlined in its 2011 Final Rule,that aimed at "clarifying","seek transparency" over this Restriction.
We can read that it knows quite well that the shareholders(Equity holders)can't get a div.
Read 6 tweets
17 Nov 20
FULLY PRIVATE GUARANTY MORTGAGE SECURITIZATION MKT
-Well capitalized/diversified guarantors assures that investors buy their UMBS at the same price(besides, fungible securities)
-@USTreasury could open a 5-mth special liquidity facility to back up their Discount Notes.#Fanniegate
The usage of DN is solely the purchase of delinquent loans from the MBS Trusts to proceed w/ a 3-mth loan modification trial upon hardship. Then,the loans bundled again as UMBS or they take possession of the collateral.
GOALS
Low cost funding of underlying biz
Avoid credit crunch
It's the model carried out by the FHLBanks, now w/ $306b DN ($460b recently)but they fund L/T assets.FnF are the ones that provide the back-up, like occurred in 2008 when FnF bailed them out, according to the then FNMA CEO.
This is why the mobsters are reluctant to set them free. Image
Read 4 tweets
24 Oct 20
.@TheJusticeDept NEGLECTS THE @FHFA-C's STATUTORY POWER
"The 3rd amdt(NWS)was a conservator's classic task: renegotiating an obligation".I.e.,a "business action of a conservator standing in the shoes of private corps"
It continues to say LIMITLESS POWERS...#Fanniegate @WhiteHouse
"sweeping grant of Powers",in its Inc Power:"in the best interests of the FHFA-C",to argue that it's complying w/ its Powers, when that's been debunked by everybody.The phrase includes "AUTHORIZED BY THIS SECTION".Then,any action must comply with the "rehab" Power too.
The DOJ...
...also omits:
-The obligations it's talking about,are EQUITY affected by HERA's Restriction On Capital Distributions.Then,there's no "renegotiation" but div suspended and REPAYMENT of the SPS under the exception(B),complying also w/ the Power: restore SOLVENCY.
-The 2nd Power...
Read 6 tweets
17 Jul 20
SWEENEY LACKS KNOWLEDGE ON THE TYPES OF SECURITIES
She claims WaFd(common shareholder)can't identify an injury unique to them and applies Fairholme case(NWS),despite signaling the Warrant is 79.9% COMMON STOCK Beneficial Ownership & Fairholme is JPS holder.#Fanniegate @WhiteHouse Image
A common stock represents ownership interest in FnF. They own 100% of the company. Thus,they have a direct claim on the issuance of a warrant that is Beneficial Ownership (SEC rule)regardless of being exercised.
Fairholme's claim is derivative(NWS): the injury is suffered by FnF.
The Warrant is a Direct claim by the Common Shareholders,but Sweeney/@TheJusticeDept omit the Warrant to justify that their allegations are Derivative.
Sweeney labels the injury as an overpayment of FnF, just like an excess of dividend,when a Warrant isn't a dividend(retribution) Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!