Non-Swedish followers are probably not aware, but this week in a "cultural" piece, Swedish state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, when asked what the "Year's pandemic" was, answered "hobby epidemiologists".
So let's talk about Anders Tegnell and epidemiology.

Epidemiology is the study of patterns of disease (and health) in a society. While today we're all discussing it re a virus, it applies also to studies of things like alcohol abuse, obesity etc, not just communicable diseases.
What is the #1 field of skill and knowledge needed in epidemiology?

In my opinion, statistics. Now, statistics alone is not enough, but it is *necessary* to have a reasonably good handle on statistics to understand (or do) epidemiology.
This is the primary reason why there have been *many* excellent contributions to our knowledge - and the communication of it - by people who were previously outside the field of public health.
In my feed, people like @tomaspueyo, @zorinaq, @CovidXIX, @jocami_ca do not, as far as I know, have backgrounds in public health.

But they are *excellent* at understanding and analysing data and interpreting and presenting the relevant statistics.
Which takes us back to Anders Tegnell.

It became quite clear to me very early on that @Folkhalsomynd, or at least Tegnell and his boss Johan Carlson, do not understand their own data.

In short, they're bad at statistics.

How do you get good at statistics? A formal education obviously helps. For me, I did a lot of statistics as part of my science degree on the way to becoming a research behavioural scientist, and then later doing a masters of public health
But mostly I learned from doing it. Days and weeks and years on end working with software like SAS and SPSS (it was a while ago, today there's more options!) and then sitting down with a Professor of Statistics to understand what it all meant.
And I by no means considered myself an expert statistician. But I do think I have a pretty good handle on the basics, and on my limitations.

Now, when I look at Tegnell's CV, where does he get this training and experience in understanding statistics?
ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/…
Frankly, I don't see it. I'm not an expert on the Swedish medical training system, but in Australia medical students get some basic statistical training, but it's nothing as extensive as what I did in my undergraduate degree.
So what about Tegnell's MSc in Epidemiology?

Well it was a few years ago, but here's how it looks now -

lshtm.ac.uk/study/courses/…
It's a 1 year course. There's one compulsory module in statistics and a later optional one in advanced statistics.

Looking back I think I've taken at least 6 formal courses in statistics (some more than once!😬). Tegnell appears to have one, plus whatever he did in med school.
The advanced stats course in that MSc is where you learn how to calculate things like R0 and we know from released emails that early in this pandemic Tegnell did not know how R0 worked and was asking others, so I think we can be confident he probably didn't take that elective.
Now, as I said, formal education is just part of it. The rest is in *the doing*, as a scientist or data analyst.

People like @janlotvall, @frelg and the other infamous "22" are scientists. They're likely dealing with statistics virtually every working day of their lives.
They have many many scientific publications which incorporate a wide range of statistical analysis. Tegnell has very few, spread over decades.

Now, I have even fewer, but I also know I sat at a computer for nearly a decade in academia doing stats nearly every day.
Has Anders Tegnell? I don't think he is. I don't think he understands the statistics his very agency is producing. It's why he constantly fails in his predictions.

I believe he's missing a fundamental skill to be an effective epidemiologist - statistics.
tegnellcitat.se
Perhaps part of the reason behind Sweden's failed pandemic response is that the guy running it for the past year, Anders Tegnell, is the *actual* "hobby epidemiologist"?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Steadson 🇦🇺🇸🇪🇪🇺🌍

David Steadson 🇦🇺🇸🇪🇪🇺🌍 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidSteadson

3 Jan
Here's what gets me about so so so many people and their response to the Swedish pandemic failure.

This is literally true ....

Sweden: We want the virus to spread
Norway: We want to stop the virus spreading

And then people are wondering why more people died in Sweden?
Was it immigrants? Population density? Age structure? Poor aged care? Timing of holidays? "Dry tinder" etc etc etc etc

There's a new freaking excuse every week or two.
Here, again, is the Deputy Chief Epidemiologist of Sweden

"The disadvantage of a complete lockdown is that there is not so much spread of infection ..."

Get that? Low spread of the virus is a *disadvantage*.

Read 6 tweets
2 Jan
@bills_n_thrills points out another complete lie from Anders Tegnell about the Sweden's place in Europe.

He states, unequivocally, that Sweden was lowest in Europe during summer.
Here is the daily mortality data for the Northern European Countries during summer.

At no point is Sweden the lowest of even it's neighbours Image
Even if we take cases, at a time when Sweden was testing *way* less than most other countries, Sweden also fails to come even close to being lowest. Image
Read 4 tweets
2 Jan
In today's Folkhälsomyndigheten preference conference, when Tegnell was asked why Sweden differs so much from our neighbours, he said it was our neighbours that were the outliers, Sweden was similar to the rest of Europe.

Here's how Sweden looks like compared to the EU average.
When @AnneliMegnerArn pointed out that Sweden was actually one of the worst in Europe, he then said it was because we were in a different phase to the other countries, having started wave 2 later.

In reality, we're far higher than the *peak* EU average of cases.
So Tegnell's excuse changed from "we're like the rest of Europe, not the Nordics" to "we're not like the rest of Europe" within the space of about 90 seconds.

When any excuse will do, any excuse will do - and this has been constant over the last 10 months.
Read 4 tweets
1 Jan
Well, Happy New Year everyone. Many people did not survive 2020, if you're reading this, you did!

Congratulations!

One thing I am *extremely* grateful for from 2020 though is the incredible number of new friends I have made this past year, primarily through twitter
I started the year rarely using twitter and with maybe 100 or so followers. I ended it with more than 3000, many of whom are far smarter, more experienced, and more qualified than I to talk about a pandemic, but apparently they found my contributions of interest.
For that, I am extremely flattered and thankful!

Some of them I'm now proud to call friends, despite the pandemic having prevented us from yet meeting in real life. Hopefully that will change for many of you before this spin around the sun is complete.
Read 11 tweets
11 Nov 20
A little perspective for all the "it's just old people" brigade.

I turn 52 in exactly a month. Prior to #longcovid I was the healthiest I've been in my life, and the fittest since I was a teen - and with zero health issues.

I've just checked the Swedish data from my age group -
In Sweden, for those aged 50-59 who have tested positive for Sars-CoV-2, 1 in 40 have ended up in ICU and more than 1 in 200 have died.

This includes both men and women -
Men though, have ended up in ICU at more than double the rate of women, despite women having more +ve tests.

This means the odds of a 50-59 year old man who tests positive ending up in ICU are closer to 1 in 30 or even 1 in 20.
Read 4 tweets
10 Nov 20
35 New #COVID19sverige deaths reported today, taking the Folkhälsomyndigheten total to 6057. The oldest change was +3 to October 29, four separate days (Nov 1,4,6,7) had 5 new deaths reported.

A clear uptick in the cumulative deaths curve is now apparent.
The rolling 7 day average is rapidly increasing, and the 10-14 day lag in reporting is clear in this graph, with each line representing the averages as presented each reporting day. The most recent data is the line that ends furthest to the right.
Once fully updated, this data will likely show we are average well over 10 deaths per day at the moment.

The Swedish Palliative Care Registry is reporting 74 Covid deaths so far in November, an increase of 42 since Friday.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!