The Government is making the same mistakes as it did in the first wave. Except with knowledge.
A thread.
The Government's strategy at the beginning of the pandemic was to 'cocoon' the vulnerable (e.g. those in care homes). This was a 'herd immunity' strategy. This interview is from March.
The Academy of Medical Scientists published a report on 14 July 'Preparing for a Challenging Winter' commissioned by the Chief Scientific Adviser that set out what needed to be done in order to prevent a catastrophe over the winter period.
At the same time, a focused protection-supporting group of scientists were invited to Downing Street to present the alternate view. Politically, this enabled this headline to be written.
In a fantastic acheivement of science, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was approved on 3 December nature.com/articles/d4158….
Since then, the Oxford/AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines have been approved.
A new variant was discovered with increased transmissibility. This caused a 'lockdown' as the NHS was now in crisis mode and there was 'a material risk of the NHS in several areas being overwhelmed'. The Government's second strategy is failing.
However, this 'lockdown' is not stringent. Many more people are allowed to send their children to school allowing the virus to mix in children and their parents.
The strategy is about 'manageable risk'. Risk to those that may die or live with the effects of catching Covid, or risk to the Government?
We are now back to vaccinating the vulnerable - focused protection if you will.
It appears that the Government has adopted a hybrid strategy - vaccination for the 'vulnerable', and herd immunity or focused protection for those that are not. There is no discussion of vaccinating children and the under-50s.
It is clear that many more lives will be lost.
I am pleased to say that Matt Hancock stated today that all adults will be offered a vaccine by Autumn. This is good news. There is a race between vaccination and infection. It is important that restrictions (the 'cry freedom' quote) are not released prematurely.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Since the March lockdown, there have been a number of changes to the list of who can go to school.
For instance, children with a 'lack of devices' 'should attend school'
The rollout of laptops was promised in the first lockdown. What happened to that?
In addition, hundreds of thousands of university/HE lecturers and support staff are now classified as 'critical workers'. Some of course are critical. Some less so.
So, we have extra pressure on school places. This will allow the virus to spread.
Government policy should be systematic.
Individual Government departments will want to maximize their own interests.
The PM and Cabinet are responsible for these trade offs and overall policy.
The PM has set an ambitious vaccination target - around 12,000,000 first doses in around 6 weeks. But what happens if instead of 2 million doses per week we have 300,000 per week (current rate)?
This happens.
We need to get vaccinations into people. Not 'hopes'
This is the wording from the PM's statement yesterday and is the source of the rough calculation above.
It's odd that this is phrased as 'the NHS hopes'.
What does the *PM* 'hope'? As it is DHSC/ CO/ BEIS/ Vaccine Task Force who are responsible for *procuring* these vaccines.
6,300 cases (7 day average)
354 patients admitted to hospital (7 day average)
1,634 patients in hospital (7 day average)
204 patients in mechanical ventilation beds (7 day ave)
34 deaths/day (7 day ave, within 28 days of +ve test)
20 October
21,866 cases
1,251 patients admitted to hospital
8,499 patients in hospital
733 ventilated patients
217 deaths/day