2. In the "good old days" Silicon Valley was about understanding technology. Silicon, to be precise. These were people who had to understand quantum mechanics, who had to build the near-miraculous devices that we now take for granted, and they had to work
3. Now, I love libertarians, and I share much of their political philosophy. But you have to be socially naive to believe that it has a chance in a real society. In those days, Silicon Valley was not a real society. It was populated by people who understood quantum mechanics
4. Then came the microcomputer revolution. It was created by people who understood how to build computers. One borderline case was Steve Jobs. People claimed that Jobs was surrounded by a "reality distortion field" - that's how good he was at understanding people, not things
5. Still, the heroes of Silicon Valley were the engineers. The people who knew how to build things. Steve Jobs, for all his understanding of people, also had quite a good understanding of technology. He had a libertarian vibe, and so did Silicon Valley
6. The 3rd wave was was the internet. It, too, started out dominated by technologists. People who understood networks. It, too, had a libertarian vibe. But soon it became dominated by marketeers. People realized that the internet was the best persuasion tool ever invented
7. People realized that you can build monopolies based on branding and network effects, alone. The technology that destroyed the ability to build monopolies based on technology, created the ability to build them on human nature
8. Silicon Valley came to be dominated not by people who understood technology, but by people who understood people. In particular, it became dominated by people who understood how to manipulate people
9. Now, technologists were still a key component of Silicon Valley. Every company had its critically-important engineering section. But who do you think determines the nature of corporate culture, the people who understand technology, or the people who understand people?
10. It's no contest, really. Even when the founders of Silicon Valley companies were technology people, as they were for Google and Facebook, the founders eventually lost the corporate culture wars to their cultural superiors
11. We will look back on the old Silicon Valley, the libertarian Silicon Valley, as a unique time in history. We won't be going back to that, until the next technological revolution takes place, in some other center of technology
12. But not all hope is lost. The cultural uniformity of Silicon Valley will inevitably be challenged by a counter-culture. And this counter-culture will have the greatest tool ever invented for navigating around monopolies, and spreading new messages: the internet
13. Everything in this thread is predicted by a short essay that I wrote six years ago, on a platform that no longer exists.
1. For years I have been astounded at the lax attitude the US has toward election fraud. Elections that take days. Ballots moved around. One of the reasons is that I have seen a much better system, the system that is used in Israel. This is thread describing the Israeli system
2. First of all, scale. Israeli polling stations are tiny by US standards. In 2015 I wrote down the stats to myself, they haven't changed much since: There are 10,119 polling stations for 5,883,365 eligible voters. That's 581 people per polling station
3. Most of the polling stations are rooms in schools. A single school might have dozens of polling stations, each in its own room. When I lived in a village, the polling station was in the community center, and there was only one polling station for the whole village
I find the Swiss data the most convincing. German, French, and Italian rates are in the exact order that you would expect
The difference between German and Italian rates *within* Switzerland are a factor of 10, similar to the difference between Germany and the US, @ScottAdamsSays. That is much more of a mystery than comparing two separate countries!
This is the podcast on Covid self-tests that you have to hear. It answers all your questions. Takeaway: It's the bureaucracy, stupid! Only 21 minutes, and Gladwell is an excellent interviewer. My notes are below
Mina: It's been first and foremost a regulatory hurdle
The only paths we have to evaluate tests like this in the US are medical diagnostic pathways. They're pathways designed specifically to ensure that a physician, like a detective, is getting all of the information they need to diagnose a sick person in front of them
Right now you can get a CLIA waver (and rapid tests have *not* gotten wavers yet) but even if you *do* get a waver you can't sell to anyone, but only to "trained and designated" people!
1. To head off future pandemics, we should divide the world into quarantine regions, now. These can be likened to the compartments of a submarine. People understand that in case of a leak, you can close off one compartment and save the whole ship
2. Similarly, we can close down a quarantine region, and save the rest of the world. Or a quarantine region can close itself down, and save itself *from* the world
3. For small countries, the quarantine region can be the whole country. But larger countries should have sub-regions. In the United States, quarantine regions should be states, though small states can combine into a single region, and large states should be subdivided