Give or take, these parties appeal to about 20% of the electorate.
/2
FVD wants a so-called "intelligent Nexit" because - arguably - they think the UK's departure was not-so-intelligent.
"Intelligent" Nexit. Lots of nodding
But FVD doesn't want to leave the EU, they want an end to the EU.
/3
They want a "different cooperation model among sovereign states" based around free trade, conveniently assuming that the EU will automatically cease to exist once the Dutch vote 'Leave'.
And EFTA should be the basis for the new model.
/4
It's full-on 'magical thinking'.
If you want to join EFTA, sure, make the case.
But be truthful about what it means.
The FVD decides to disregard the EEA agreement, which governs trade between the EFTA-4 and the EU27, and the EU rules and regs that EFTA countries follow.
/5
It's like FVD thinks it can strike bilateral deals with European countries once it has left the EU, because the EU will then have magically disappeared. (David Davis klaxon!)
It also thinks NL won't be in the EU-26's regulatory orbit, ...because EFTA countries aren't???🤦♂️
/6
I don't have time to go through all inconsistencies in their reasoning (yet).
Safe to say, this is not an "intelligent Nexit" but a "unicorn Nexit".
Unfortunately, people might actually fall for this.
Anyway, on to the PVV.
/7
PVV published its party programme yesterday.
They want to leave the EU because:
- EU fisheries policy
- unelected Eurocrats/ politically corrupt
- no control of our borders
- "we want control over our own money, migration policy & laws"
I see a theme!🧐
/8
Now I remember where I heard those points before!
And there you have it, in the party programme the PVV writes: "What the Brits can do, we can do too!"
/9
Ofcourse, here too, no ideas about the type of deal that the Netherlands could strike with the EU after departure, or what this means for rules & regulations, NTBs, tariffs, or economic effects.
It's all about the sovereignty, baby.
/10
I guess the PVV is right, "what the Brits did, we can do too." I'm just not sure the rest of the country thinks we should.
Looking back at the past four years in British politics, I don't think many in NL will say "yes doctor, give me some of that medicine, please".
/11
But I cd be wrong.
And that's why media, biz, politicians, thinktanks have a duty to ask for clarification.
Ask PVV & FVD to spell out their plan, what happens after Nexit?
Because, what they have now, is wafer-thin and has more holes than Swiss cheese (and they're in EFTA).
/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, a little thread on the challenges we face in #Brexit Round 9 and Boris’ backfiring IM Bill.
Despite (or perhaps, because of) the collapse in trust due to the IM Bill, a deal between the EU and UK can still be done. But it will come at a cost. And BJ will have to pay it.
/1
EU has made it clear it wont freeze FTA talks in response to the IM Bill. ‘Parallelism’ does not apply regarding implementation of NI Protocol. But EU27 will consider legal action once their deadline expires later this week.
/2
But BJ may anticipate this, and "want" it.
Nothing says “I’m tough on Brussels” than being sued by EU lawyers.
/3
Everything is digital. It’s all online. Of course.
For past 2 years (!!) Port, NL government, Customs, export agencies, logistics folks have been working with their counterparts across EU27 to ensure relevant haulers across EU27 know about the system.
/3
The Netherlands is traditionally one of America's staunchest allies. Atlanticism runs deep.
But what does the Dutch population think of today's transatlantic relations, European strategic autonomy, and a 'Cold War' with China?
We took the Dutch pulse. (N = 23.000)
THREAD /1
The Dutch are pivoting to 'more Europe'.
72% of the Dutch population support deeper cooperation with France & Germany, in light of Brexit and Trump's America First policies.
/2
Interestingly, even among the Eurosceptics (those that support PVV, Forum, SGP), more people support deeper cooperation with Berlin & Paris, then do not.