1//
Let's break down the new US federal policy requiring a negative #covid19 test before boarding announced today because it covers a few important concepts
It requires that people flying into the US have a negative test within 3 days of flying
3/ This highlights the "one test is one test" point: all that test is saying is that you are negative when you got it
That is not a reason to not test-- but it is a reason to want a neg result as close to whatever event it is (flight or otherwise) that you can #covid19
3.5/ Because in those 3 days before the flight, you can definitely incubate virus and infect folks on the flight. The Dubai-NZ situation was 4 days & there were other factors (incomplete masking, vents off for 30 minutes etc); but you get the point
Test to fly interval is key
4/ In the hospital (not all, but where I work), we can get rtPCR tests back by the same day if we can get that swab done in the AM
In Wuhan, back in *FEBRUARY 2020*, their PCR turn around time was 4 hours.
What they managed to do there still to this day astounds me #covid19
5/ Another key point- quarantining
So a negative test before you fly is great- it can potentially reduce transmission in packed flights
But I'm actually more concerned about people landing in new places & going about their business thinking everything is cool
It's not.
6/ Bc that neg test is just that- a snapshot in time- quarantining is key (CDC now says 7 day quarantine w/ a neg test at the end of it is acceptable; I think this is reasonable)
But I fear that many people aren't quarantining the right way (& many frankly can't)
7/ Bc when we say quarantine, we mean quarantine in the house too-- you are basically pretending you are infectious; sleeping separately, staying away from others, masks on in the house, the whole deal
Some people (I suspect) are "quarantining" by staying home, but not more
8/ The irony of all of this-- the US has an even worse epidemic than most other places
Frankly, they should be more worried of us flying there
And we should implement better **domestic flight** policies #covid19
9/ Ultimately, I would not recommend flying at this time either way if you can avoid it bc we should be focusing on reducing mobility/viral spread
Summary
-- reduce that test to flight interval as much as you can
Short thread 1/ One of the weirdest things about our quarantine policies in this country is that they were never actually enforced
We’ve been functioning on scout’s honor for 11 months & it doesn’t seem to be working? #covid19
2/ I personally know a number of people that traveled south for the holidays & did not quarantine upon arrival to Massachusetts- hell some even went to bars when they got back (@marty_walsh - one reason why these should be *temporarily closed*- not limited capacity)
3/ And for those that are staying home to quarantine, unclear what % are actually full on in quarantine in the house (essentially pretending you’re infectious, masking if you leave the room, eating/sleeping separately etc) #covid19
THREAD
1// Have been saying this for months— and have actually have been doing this for the entire year any time I went back to LA to see family, even with a negative test.
High risk workers should mask at home if they have regular exposure. Every layer matters. #covid19
2// Increasingly colleagues of mine are incidentally testing positive without known exposure- takes 1-2 days to get PCR result back; end up exposing whole family in that time.
Nothing inherently safe about the home unfortunately.
3// In fact, may end up being most dangerous given less likely to mask here; very close prolonged exposure; crowding; ventilation variable
Now I’m going to accept that pragmatically speaking, most people are not going to mask at home BUT here are some personal recommendations...
One concept that doesn’t seem to have fully caught on in dialogue— we don’t need to get any single intervention to work 100% effectively, nor is that an achievable goal.
Even if we got every layer of prevention to work 25% better, could still get R<1 and keep it there
2/ What won’t work is doing a whole bunch of different things half-ass w/ none of them really working.
3/ Why I’m bringing this up: as people criticize idea of getting the administration to ship us better masks (ex “not everyone wears masks”)— we don’t need *everyone* to wear masks to stop the epidemic. We do need more people to have access to better PPE along w/ everything else
1/ Our new piece in @statnews — along with vaccine rollout, the US needs a high filtration mask initiative
Every American should have access to high filtration masks for use any time they have to be outside their home in indoor spaces #covid19
___ statnews.com/2021/01/07/nat…
2/ As the pandemic surges, most of the cases I am now seeing in the hospital do not know where or how they were infected
A number of them report wearing cloth masks regularly, & this is much better than no mask
1/ Important point from @K_G_Andersen — variant #B117 in San Diego; may not change what we need to do— but is an urgent reminder that we are not even doing what we need to do well enough as it is.
1/
Outbreak of #covid19 on an 18 hour flight in September flying from Dubai to New Zealand now officially published
7 ultimately infected; 4 likely in flight, sitting within 4 rows of one another, 2 of them while reportedly wearing masks
2/ 5 out of the 7 had been tested **before the flight** and tested negative
2 didn’t report getting tested before the flight but are *not* thought to be the index cases (those who started the outbreak)
BUT Index case was tested **5 days** before the flight!
3/ I circled the days that index case *should have been tested* — 24-48 hours before flight, when they had likely started incubating the virus; when detection could have happened; when the outbreak could have been prevented