This might seem like another "we need financial literacy" tweet. But to me, it's not, here's my theory:
This speaks volumes about the existing system. It's clearly not working for a whole lot of people, particularly the non English folks and young people.
The product sellers are partially to blame. The nonsense they spew in the name of "financial education" is an insult. All those god awful videos and nonsensical garbage masquerading as "content" is enough to make you wanna gouge your eyes out.
This is even worse in the insurance industry where selling trumps everything. And given that banks are the only source of financial advice most people have access to, the problem has reached nightmarish proportions.
Banks can get volumes and that means insurance companies don't have an incentive to do anything to curtail mis selling. Why kill the goose that lays golden eggs? Which is why the number of people who understand insurance are far fewer than those that understand MFs.
In case of investment products, the entire architecture is built with the explicit goal of shoving a product down someone's throat without bothering about the 2nd and 3rd order effects of that. Why educate when you can sell?
It's easier to get a new investors than to convince a disillusioned investor who has had a terrible experience. But these stupid AMCs and intermediaries could care less. When a sale trumps retention, that shit is WRONG!
And then add to this toxic pungent mix, the platforms etc, the end result is investors either stay away or have bad experiences and never come back.
What makes this worse is that we don't nearly have enough financial advisors. For every RIA, we have 3000 tipsters, that ratio is scary. And given this shit, you get scams like this.
A few 100 RIAs, and at most some 20K MF distributors are not nearly enough.
And then the easy suggestion everyone seems to think of as a silver bullet is that we need "financial education" or "financial literacy" initiatives. But there's growing evidence that these things don't work.
Coming back to my theory? Do we need a new way of talking to young and first time investors about finance? I'm not talking about short content etc, that's just one part. Or is my theory bullshit and investors are lazy and the existing info works and they are just lazy bums?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's a beautiful Saturday on this Corona riddled planet. It's a good day to do the following:
1. Open your account statement and find out how much commissions you are paying. You'd be paying anywhere between 0.7% to 1.3% extra over direct plans.
1.5 You can download your statement on CAMS, KARVY, NSDL etc.
2. If you are one of those Robinhood Traders and you started mistakenly investing in mutual funds instead of trading mutual funds, commissions can kill you! A simple 1% difference in commissions can add over 10-15 years. This comparison has been done to death but once more.
What a story this is. Global ETF and ETP assets at US$7.99 trillion. Millions of small investors across the world getting low-cost diversified access to stocks, bonds and Marijuana ETFs and savings billions in fees.
Although ETFs are orphan products in India, one day in the next 7 to 10 years, ETFs will surely see growth in India. Won't happen before the next beat market happens though.
From about 50 ETFs 2-3 years ago, we're ate 100 ETFs now. We're seeing new bond ETFs aper from those 10 year gilt ones, we now have an emerging line up of smart beta ETFs. That's progress.
If you look closely, 4 out of the 6 top NFOs in terms of money raised are from bank owned NFOs. These AMCs are notoriously skilled at selling garbage funds through their banking channels. They've turned mis-selling into an art. They're are Picasso's of mis-selling
One would be excused for thinking these are intent based allocations by investors which isn't the case. These funds would've been sold mis-sold by any way possible. Bank RMs are incentivized to do so.
BNP Paribas Mutual Fund has filed to launch BNP Paribas Aqua Fund of Fund. Underlying fund - BNP Paribas Aqua, which invests in companies with a focus on water. Clearly playing off on the hotness of ESG and global
The fund has marginally delivered over the benchmark. But the questions is, is it really worth all the hassle? Taking a fund manager risk, theme risk, style risk etc. Sure, you may get paid for it. But it's a hit or a miss.
In my it often pays to keep costs low and keep things uncomplicated as possible. One thing investors might not realize is that this trend of AMCs with foreign parentage or affiliations launching FOFs for useless global funds will pickup steam if the US performance continues.
I'm seeing a lot of responses to this tweet about too many traders, punters and so on. Will all due respect, these snappy takes are just plain wrong. It takes traders, investors, degenerate gamblers, Warren Buffett ka baap value investors, idiots like me,
god level forensic accounting stock pickers to make a market. The most stupidest narrative to have come of this post pandemic boom in users among brokers & other investing platforms is this asinine "Robinhood traders" narrative, I had written bout it too. nakedbeta.com/musings-rants/…
The insinuation is that apparently, there's a horde of day traders, selling their houses, pledging their body organs and are gambling their money away. The replies in the tweet are an extension of the absolutely dumb narrative.
Nobody cares about the things that matter - getting investors in, helping new distributors advisors, making things (Slightly) easier for investors, honest mis-selling etc.
Nobody cares about direct plans of mutual funds
Nobody cares about about mutual funds either
Very few care about mutual funds. Just 2.1 crore unique investors. If you probably take out HNIs/institutions in this, that's maybe 20-30%, what's left are the common gareeb folks.