My @thetimes column about the most important economic issue no-one is talking about: the collapsing fertility rate. Not long ago the UK had one of the highest fertility rates in Europe. Not any more. This could have ENORMOUS consequences... thetimes.co.uk/article/bed703…
These two @ONS charts tell you the story. Up until 2012 the total fertility rate (eg no of children per woman on avg) was just under 2. By late 2020 it was 1.6. It has NEVER been that low. This pre-dates #COVID19. It is a trend. But one which v few seem to have taken on board.
Sidenote: it’s quite plausible that 2020 is the first year since the 1970s (and one of the only on record) that deaths outnumber births in England & Wales. We won’t know for a bit but both look like being just over 600k. Depressing milestone.
Sidenote 2: population growth equals births minus deaths plus net migration. And when you bear in mind migration outflows during #COVID19 it’s possible (likely?) that total UK population fell in 2020 at the fastest rate since WW2 - as per this paper from yday
The drop in fertility rates is a more puzzling & potentially more consequential trend. The conventional wisdom is still that the UK has slightly more favourable demographic fundamentals than Germany or Italy. But that’s because no-one’s been paying attention to the actual numbers
UK fertility rate is now on par with Germany’s. If sustained, that will mean a faster ageing population and, in longer run, a shrinking population, cf Japan.
For a lot of people this will sound like good news. And there’s nothing wrong with being smaller. But it has consequences:
The welfare state upon which the elderly rely & will increasingly rely (and here I mainly mean the NHS & pensions) are highly dependent on a sizeable workforce. Both to provide people to work and to pay the taxes to fund it. Lower fertility means fewer homegrown workers in future
With shrinking populations around the western world, it’s possible that far from attempting to keep immigrants out, in the coming decades countries end up competing to attract immigrants in, to work in healthcare/social care and provide other services.
For a more considered global take on these demographic trends I’d highly recommend Charles Goodhart and Manoj Pradhan’s book The Great Demographic Reversal. It’s a fascinating analysis of how demography is the real big story in the global economy palgrave.com/gp/book/978303…
And it’s not all bad news. A shrinking population could mean somewhat higher wages (though also higher interest rates) and a narrowing of inequality. The point, however, is that we’ve barely started to internalise this stuff, let alone confront it.
Worse: in the UK we blithely assume that these trends won’t affect us as badly as much of Europe or Russia or Japan, because we’ve convinced ourselves our fertility fundamentals are better. Well, no. They’re not. As I say ☝️ fertility has dropped and no-one seems to have noticed
Why have fertility rates collapsed? High house prices/debt which prevent young adults from settling down? Cultural changes? Benefits cuts? All plausible. But scant work has been done on this, perhaps because too few have realised it’s actually happening thetimes.co.uk/article/bed703…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Conway

Ed Conway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EdConwaySky

11 Jan
Where does #COVID19 rank in the most depressing league table of all - the one comparing historic pandemics? We won't know for sure until the pandemic is over but we do now have enough data to draw some early conclusions. I've done some digging into the numbers:
I should say that I began this process unsure of what I'd find. Back in the spring I looked back at historical weekly deaths figs and found that while the 2020 levels were horribly high (and unprecedented seasonally) some weeks of Hong Kong flu were worse.
The weekly deaths numbers only go back so far. But we now have data for the 52 weeks of 2020 up to Christmas Day, which is enough to make a conservative estimate of how 2020 compares with history. And we have nearly two centuries of data to compare it to…
Read 20 tweets
10 Jan
Duncan is right. Lockdown rules are slightly softer. More key workers. More COVID-compliant workplaces.
It feels v plausible there’s less compliance this time around but is that really clear cut from mobility data alone?
Also worth bearing in mind in lockdown 1 there’s lots of evidence that many households & businesses went above & beyond the rules. Eg key workers not sending children to school even tho they could. Firms (esp construction) shuttering tho rules said they could continue working…
When I take a (completely unscientific but perhaps no less unscientific than some of the hot takes out there) glance at the data I’d say: less movement than autumn lockdown but more than last spring. That doesn’t seem too far detached from the severity of the rules themselves
Read 5 tweets
6 Jan
There will doubtless be lots of attention on this number tonight: 1k #COVID19 deaths for first time since last spring.
Now, a lot of people are dying, the number is mounting and this is clearly awful news.
BUT be cautious about this fig. It comes back to the bank holiday effect…
As I said yday, testing and deaths registration is affected by xmas and new year - and that’s happening with this data. The 1k deaths figure is not deaths happening in the past 24 hours but deaths REPORTED in that period. An important distinction when gauging #COVID19 spread
In the case of tonight’s 1k deaths figure, almost one in four of them happened more than a week ago: there’s a big backlog of registrations which are only now being processed. The real picture is the red line in this chart. Not the grey line (where that 1k fig comes from)
Read 5 tweets
5 Jan
I’m diving back into the #COVID19 data.
I’d rather hoped I wouldn’t have to but the stats are, once again, scary.
However, I hope I can provide some context, since I see there are still plenty claiming this is either the end of the world or nothing to fear at all.
A case in point is tweets like this. George is right that the curve is almost vertical, but this is precisely why it makes sense to use logarithmic axes and provide some cross-country comparisons. You might, to look at this, have assumed the UK faces a unique crisis, but no:
Convert it to a log axis and add a couple of countries it’s a different story. Yes the UK rise recently is fast, but actually Ireland’s looks faster - though still at slightly lower levels than in UK. Compare UK to Belgium and you see it had a considerably worse outbreak in Oct
Read 16 tweets
1 Jan
Which developed country would you say is facing the biggest economic slump of all? The conventional answer is the UK. Eg see this @OECD forecast. But here's a thread about an obscure bit of statistical small print which might mean we've been overstating the scale of the recession
Before we get onto the small print let's deal with what the numbers are telling us. And there's no doubt they're bad. Very bad. Indeed, the @OBR_UK reckons we're facing the biggest slump in GDP since 1709. Down 11% this year alone.
We won't get final 2020 GDP for months (and even that'll be subject to revision). But on the basis of the 1st estimate of Q3 GDP UK contracted at annual rate of 9.7%. So you can see where OBR are coming from ons.gov.uk/economy/grossd…

* yes it was later revised; we'll get to that
Read 25 tweets
24 Dec 20
Here’s a fundamental Brexit truth I don’t think we’ve discussed enough: the reason why Brexit has been on the front pages for so much of the past few years doesn’t actually have that much to do with Brexit. Let me explain:
Of course the UK’s relationship with the EU is of enormous economic, social & legal importance, past, present and future. Of course the trade deal matters, as will immigration rules and all the rest. But the real, real reason Brexit has been such a big deal is something else:
Brexit is first and foremost a story about the Tory party, which happens to be the party of government. Brexit mattered these past four and a half years because it deposed two prime ministers. It decided elections. It was an issue of immense political significance.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!