This is mostly because of more people (humans don't want fire near their houses) and more agriculture (farmers don't want their crops on fire)
Here is the historical reconstruction with explanations — notice that climate (direct temperature and moisture changes) has lead to *less* fire, but CO₂ fertilization has increased amount of green stuff that can burn sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Over the coming days I'll look at fires into the future (global warming will increase fires, but CO₂ cuts are the least effective way to help), and look at individual areas like the US, Brazil and Australia
Climate scares based on breathless climate reporting can lead to bad decisions
Climate change a real problem, but we must be careful not — in panic — spending so many resources, the cure is costlier than the affliction
We have data back to 1970, but before satellites (~1980), it is probably undercounted. Moreover, 1970s and 1980s were relative hurricane lulls, so starting there can give a spurious upward trend
Contrary to breathless climate reporting, number of major landfalling US hurricanes — the most reliable hurricane indicator — has not increased since 1900
(Notice unprecedented major hurricane drought from 2006-16)
Contrary to breathless media reporting, land-falling US hurricanes — the most reliable hurricane indicator — does not show an increasing number of hurricanes since 1900