Despite breathless climate reporting on ever-more fire

Total area burned across the world has *declined* over past 117 years

Reduced about 25% over last two decades alone

Shouldn't this be reported?

agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.100…, globalfiredata.org/analysis.html, gwis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/static/gwis.st…
This trend is entirely uncontroversial, well known across all research, here from Science magazine, science.sciencemag.org/content/356/63…

This is mostly because of more people (humans don't want fire near their houses) and more agriculture (farmers don't want their crops on fire)
Here is the historical reconstruction with explanations — notice that climate (direct temperature and moisture changes) has lead to *less* fire, but CO₂ fertilization has increased amount of green stuff that can burn
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Over the coming days I'll look at fires into the future (global warming will increase fires, but CO₂ cuts are the least effective way to help), and look at individual areas like the US, Brazil and Australia
Climate scares based on breathless climate reporting can lead to bad decisions

Climate change a real problem, but we must be careful not — in panic — spending so many resources, the cure is costlier than the affliction

Read my peer-reviewed article:
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Scared witless has real impacts

Half the world now believe climate change will make humanity go extinct

Reality? UN expects average person in 2100 to be 450% richer. Climate will make that 434%. Problem, not end-of-world

My new book (free first 25p): ow.ly/HUkU50A9v1o

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bjorn Lomborg

Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BjornLomborg

15 Jan
Despite breathless climate reporting warning us of ever more damaging extreme weather

US relative flood damage has strongly declined from 1903-2019, from 0.5% of GDP to 0.05% today

Update of fig 10, sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
facebook.com/bjornlomborg/p…
This fits well with global weather-related damages not increasing (actually slightly decreasing)
Climate scares based on breathless climate reporting can lead to bad decisions

Climate change a real problem, but we must be careful not — in panic — spending so many resources, the cure is costlier than the affliction

Read my peer-reviewed article: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 4 tweets
13 Jan
Dear Greta,

Worth taking these 'predictions' with a bucket-full of salt

One of the lead authors, Paul Ehrlich, has been predicting the imminent end of mankind for 50+ years, here from CBS national news in 1970

(from PBS retroreport.org/video/the-popu…)
Yes, climate is a problem, but not the end of the world

UN estimates the cost of climate change in 2070s equivalent to losing 0.2-2% of income

In UN middle scenario: instead of each person being 3.63x as rich, we will 'only' be 3.56x as rich

sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Image
At the same time, the UN expects us to live much longer, have much better educations

- and inequality will drop dramatically, possibly below the levels 200 years ago

You can read about this and much more in my peer-reviewed sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Image
Read 4 tweets
6 Jan
Breathless climate reporting told us of an extraordinary 2020 hurricane season

Yes. It was extraordinary. Extraordinarily *weak*

Globally 2020 was one of the weakest in past 40 years

Accumulated Cyclone Energy was 76% of average (1980-2010)

Update of agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
But we were told of 2020 'record' hurricanes?

Yes, in North Atlantic

But most climate reporting conveniently left out:

much lower hurricane energy in Western Pacific+Eastern Pacific

lower energy in Southern Hemisphere, Nothern Hemisphere and Global

agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
We have data back to 1970, but before satellites (~1980), it is probably undercounted. Moreover, 1970s and 1980s were relative hurricane lulls, so starting there can give a spurious upward trend

Still, 2020 was a very un-active year
Read 8 tweets
4 Jan
Contrary to breathless climate reporting, number of major landfalling US hurricanes — the most reliable hurricane indicator — has not increased since 1900

(Notice unprecedented major hurricane drought from 2006-16)

Update of my free, peer-reviewed sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Image
Scared witless has real impacts

Half the world now believe climate change will make humanity go extinct

Reality? UN expects average person in 2100 to be 450% richer. Climate will make that 434%. Problem, not end-of-world

My new book (free first 25p): ow.ly/HUkU50A9v1o Image
Similarly: Despite breathless climate reporting, the number of landfalling US hurricanes does not show an increase since 1900

Update of my free, peer-reviewed sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Image
Read 4 tweets
3 Jan
Contrary to breathless media reporting, land-falling US hurricanes — the most reliable hurricane indicator — does not show an increasing number of hurricanes since 1900

Update of my free, peer-reviewed sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Scared witless has real impacts

Half the world now believe climate change will make humanity go extinct

Reality? UN expects average person in 2100 to be 450% richer. Climate will make that 434%. Problem, not end-of-world

My new book (free first 25p): ow.ly/HUkU50A9v1o
Yes, 2020 Atlantic hurricane season very powerful

But Accumulated Cyclone Energy (the integrated metric of frequency, intensity+duration):

2020 only 14th-strongest

1933 — almost a century ago — still strongest, followed by 2005, 2017, 1893 and 1926

journals.ametsoc.org/bams/article/d…
Read 6 tweets
21 Nov 20
Why do we donate so much time+money inefficiently?

We care about effectiveness when giving to ourselves or our family

When giving to strangers, we care about what *others* think about us (they don't evaluate us on effectiveness)

nature.com/articles/s4156…
If our giving is multiplied 10x by, say, Gates, we should give more (because your dollar will mean $10 to the good cause)

But we don't give more to charity

If Gates multiplied a giving to ourselves, we *do* give more

nature.com/articles/s4156…
Getting us to give effectively is just very, very hard.

We mostly give in ways that are "reputationally lucrative" — ways that make us look good among our peers

nature.com/articles/s4156…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!