Please, for the love of any god you like, just...do not reply to people disputing an incorrect opinion you have stated with any variation of “I’m allowed to have an opinion”. The same applies to people telling you the facts you produced to support a genuine opinion are wrong.
Dispute how they have interpreted the facts you presented: sure! Produce citations showing where your facts came from: absolutely! Run off to sea and go a-viking: if you must, please use #PPE and #sociallydistance while raiding. Maybe use bows? But facts are facts, not opinions.
You are absolutely allowed to hold any *actual* opinions you wish. They may make you a terrible person, but that doesn’t change your right to hold them. Facts are not opinions. You are not allowed to “believe” #trans ppl don’t exist or that the #COVID19 vaccine is totally
ineffective just because you want those things to be the case and then defend them with “I’m allowed to have an opinion”. Objective facts are not opinions.
You can absolutely dispute how facts are *presented*, how certain things are categorised etc. That’s the absolute basis of how critical thinking operates. But all of these things must relate to observable reality in some way. That is an absolutely different thing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the most utterly heartbreaking things I had to learn when an illness I had no idea about was destroying my life was “there’s no point going to a #GP without a fucking itemised list of goals. #chronicillness#disabled
You need to give them the service you want them to refer you to, often with an actual consultant’s name and sometimes with their secretary’s email address. And you need to phone back next week to make sure they’ve actually put the referral through. And keep phoning to chase it.
(If you, like me, are #autistic and find phone communication nightmarishly difficult, you need to suck it up because no GP seems remotely willing to communicate with patients by email).