The news media is a crucial institution for democratic decision-making, providing much of the information on which citizens base their political choices.
Unfortunately, powerful interests have co-opted them to disseminate #propaganda.
'Institutional processes lead the news media to propagate output supportive of dominant state-corporate elite interests... powerful agents and groups intentionally manage the news arena and thereby guide journalistic selection and production processes.'
"As a consequence, journalists produce and distribute #propaganda without intending to do so and on behalf of dominant state-corporate interests. Theoretical conceptualisations of what constitutes propaganda can be applied with validity to the content structures of media texts:
"...the prevalence of ideological media content pattern, the selective use of facts, or the emphasis and deemphasis of certain facts and perspectives constitutes #propaganda as identified by leading scholars in the field."
"The institutional processes that lead the news media to produce and distribute #propaganda on behalf of dominant elite interests should be further assessed in order to account for what Miller and Dinan (2010: 2) described as the ‘“circuit” of communication’."
"While evidence points to the commercial structure of the news media as a major concern, more research is needed to understand how outside pressures of lobby groups impact news media performance. It could be argued that these forces have obtained even more importance in the C21".
"This is so because powerful actors are currently using a range of Organised Persuasive Communication techniques to counter open spaces in the digital communication environment that potentially allows for diverse communication activities."
"The significance of the forces that are engaged in ‘organized political persuasion’ need to be further assessed in relation to the news media. Similarly, more research is needed in regard to how these interests influence public service & online news providers."
"The disappearance of #propaganda from studies of liberal democracies & their news media & communication systems inhibits critical scrutiny & constitutes a triumph of propaganda in itself."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's OK be wrong. We can't always be right. More importantly, we need to value having the confidence to change our mind in light of new, reliable, & credible information or evidence - even if it contradicts what we previously thought. Imho, that shows REAL strength of character.
ONE major problem we face is that our current commercial print & broadcast news is increasingly partisan & combative, disproportionately features views which align with powerful interests, too often denies complexity & nuance, & avoids the measured & impartial framing of stories.
In a context of hyper-free-market capitalism in the UK & USA, it's clear that very powerful & grotesquely wealthy individuals disproportionately own & influence much of the press & broadcast news in order to help shape public opinion & Govt policy, & thus protect their interests.
BAD NEWS for COVID-deniers & anti-vaxxers: to counter their viral #misinformation at a time when #COVID19 vaccines are being rolled out, new research has produced a “psychological vaccine” against misinformation, in the form of online games (links below).
Rather than simply exposing #misinformation, new research focuses on the more general ways in which people are misled – #manipulation techniques such as the use of excessively emotional language, the construction of conspiracy theories, & the false testimony of fake experts.
In a series of online games, players learn how #misinformation works from the inside by being encouraged to create their own fake news: Bad News is about misinformation in general, Harmony Square is about political misinformation, & Go Viral! about misinformation around #COVID19.
Far-right parties are currently gaining momentum & exerting parliamentary influence in diverse countries such as the UK, Hungary, the USA, Austria, Sweden, Germany, & Denmark.
Far-right recruitment discourse offers an affective script of feeling angry, insulted, & ashamed, as well as courageous, proud, & hopeful.
Research shows how affective–discursive practices are employed to create gateways to radicalization and ideologically motivated violence.
Within fascism, the myth of #palingenesis, that is “national rebirth from the ashes,” is continual and key to the motivation of political action & violence: 'heroism' is the “psychological recompense for fascist political activism.”
The Libertarian-billionaire funded Right pretend free speech is threatened from an authoritarian Left, yet 90% of UK campaigners say their free speech is threatened by hostile right-wing politicians & media using them as “fodder for phoney culture wars".
Nearly two-thirds of campaigners say politicians are increasingly negative & less tolerant towards charities which actively fight for social justice, with politicians “shutting down channels of communication, & attacking campaigners & their allies as a threat to the common good”.
Examples include criticism of the @nationaltrust by the "Common Sense group" of Tories for publishing a report into historical slavery links at some of its country house properties. The MPs used an antisemitic conspiracy to accuse the Trust of "cultural Marxist", “woke” agenda.
So Guido Fawkes claims Chloe Schlosberg was suspended from @Twitter for calling Lord Ian Austin a ‘psycho’, & because of this, she is a "violence-promoting extremist politico".
Guido Fawkes has also called Gordon Brown, Chris Huhne, Tom Baldwin & Adrian McMenamin "psychopaths".
On the subject of "violence promoting extremist politicos", here's an interesting story about the Daily Mail & Guido Fawkes from @zelo_street:
And more on the subject of "violence promoting extremist politicos" - this one about the relationship between the right-wing press & the rise of Far Right terrorism in Britain (feat: Lord Ian Austin):
New research into anti-immigration rhetoric, which I'll try to summarise in this THREAD.
It basically suggests that the emotive use of metaphor & hyperbole in anti-immigration rhetoric drives base support & INCREASES their likelihood of political action.
Typical anti-immigration rhetoric used by right-wing populist nationalist parties presents immigrants as outsiders, who are framed as a threat to the populist nationalists idealized nation.
In their anti-immigration rhetoric, politicians typically use strong, vivid, & negative metaphors & hyperboles to frame their political statements.
There is agreement that, at least for parts of the electorate, such populist anti-immigration rhetoric can be highly persuasive.