Spoiler: Yes, partly because the GOP isn't
conservative.

I think this is an interesting question. (Time to get philosophical 🤔)

The place to start, I think is how political psychologists define conservatism.

1/
2/ True conservatives, according to prof. @Jonhaidt, form a kind of yin-yang balance with liberals
ted.com/talks/jonathan…
Liberals embrace forward-looking change.

Conservatives value order.
From Haidt: the conservative insight is that order is hard to achieve and easy to lose.
3/ Reactionaries, on the other hand seek rapid change—backwards to a bygone era.

Other political psychologists (see @karen_stenner) describe conservatives as embracing a desire to maintain the status quo.
4/ If reactionaries want to go back to the past, and conservatives want to maintain the status quo, it seems to me that the nation’s history and politics change the nature of conservatism and reactionism.
5/ America, in the past—say, before the 20th century—was ruled entirely by white Christian men.

America still has racial inequality.

So a desire to keep things the same and a desire to go backwards both end up with racist objectives.
6/ Reactionary politics as embraced in the United States is extremely destructive because to get back to a bygone era when white men could do as they pleased, you have to dismantle almost the entire federal government, which will cause widespread suffering.
7/ Look what happened with Covid under the leadership of a party that doesn’t want a functioning federal government.

When people say “conservatives” they often mean reactionaries because the current GOP is not conservative. It’s reactionary.
8/ So it's certainly destructive.

Whether it is self-destructive remains to be seen.

The most interesting thing happening in politics right now is that the GOP appears to be on a collusion course with time.

9/ By collision course with time, I mean that in a two party system, it will become impossible for a white-nationalist reactionary party to win national elections.

The demographics willing to embrace such a party are shrinking.
10/ All errors in my threads are entirely the fault of keyboard gremlins.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Adding: In my most recent NBC Op Ed, I argued that American politics is likely to shift from left v. right to pro-democracy v. anti-democracy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

24 Jan
The threat is that Trump will create a third party, the "MAGA Party," effectively splitting and dooming the GOP.

Others have talked about calling it the Patriot Party.

As in: Nice little Republican Party you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
Quotation from the article⤵️

Convict me, and I'll destroy your party.

I'd like you to do us a favor, though.

The irony is that the Senate GOP failed to convict Trump when he tried to extort the president of Ukraine.

What's that they say about karma?

washingtonpost.com/politics/trump… Image
Third parties work very effectively in the U.S. as spoilers.

It's pretty clear that George W. won in 2000 because Ralph Nader siphoned off enough left-wing votes.

And would Clinton have won in 1992 without Ross Perot siphoning off conservative votes?
Read 10 tweets
20 Jan
I felt confident we'd reach this day.

I also know that the story of right-wing insurgency doesn't end here.

🎶They'll be back, like before🎶
They will fight more fights to win the war.
I always qualified with an "if"

I said "We will get through this if enough people are willing to do the work."

My confidence came from seeing how many people were willing to do the work.
New followers don't know that I adopted you all.

It happened a few years ago when a follower asked me to adopt him. I didn't want to play favorites, so I adopted all my followers.

So you are all Twitter siblings and I expect you all to get along.

Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
This doesn't look good for Trump's chances in the Senate Impeachment Trial.

It's hard to imagine acquitting after making a statement like his one.
He also said this: "We certified the people’s clear choice for their 46th president."

Everyone should read the full statement. It's quite interesting.

It's almost like McConnell doesn't need Trump anymore and isn't afraid of him.
I'm sure McConnell and others want to get rid of Trump as a force in politics.

Trump, on the other hand, has vowed his revenge.

🍿
Read 5 tweets
18 Jan
Actually, they did, and they included a remedy: Impeachment and removal.

The problem we've had the past 4 years isn't just a corrupt president.

The problem is that so many people (including the entire GOP elected leadership) shielded him.
If the elected officials of one party abuse the constitution and get reelected, the problem is with the electorate.

For example, if a majority of Americans decided to reelect Trump--knowing everything we know about him--you can't blame the Constitution.
No laws can protect a democracy if a clear majority of the citizens decide they no longer want a democracy because they will keep electing officials who will destroy rule of law.
Read 6 tweets
18 Jan
The best answer I know:

🔹No, the pardons can't be overturned
🔹Corrupt pardons can be prosecuted as a separate crime
🔹Trump can't pardon himself, so if he pardons all the insurrectionists, he'll be left to take all the blame
🔹He'll hurt his chances of acquittal in the Senate
I doubt he will do it because it will hurt him.

On the other hand, not pardoning them creates a problem for him because the insurrectionists might start to realize they were duped, and he needs his base.
You'd think some of his supporters will realize that he set them up: He encouraged them to commit a crime (assuring them they're saving the country) and then left them to face prison.

The idea is to take down a criminal organization by getting the Kingpin.
Read 13 tweets
16 Jan
I see two possibilities ahead for the Republican Party.

#1: The party hardens as a right-wing white nationalist party and shrinks in size.

#2: Moderates conservatives retake the party. This, however, creates what political scientists call the "conservative dilemma."

1/
The conservative dilemma, in a nutshell is this: Conservatives tend to represent the wealth and powerful corporations, therefore the policies they advocate are not appealing to the majority of people.

In other words, they will have trouble winning elections.

2/
In the years since 1954, the Republican Party, while calling itself conservative, solved the conservative dilemma by bringing white nationalists and KKK types into the party, coddling them for their votes while trying to keep them on the sidelines.

3/
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!