If you care only about winning the next election, you can't also care about doing what is right.
This may lead them to actually acquit Trump for inciting an attack on the U.S. Capitol-- a crime that was actually filmed.
It also means that the GOP will not be able to win elections for at least a few cycles while they regroup and reposition themselves as a center-right party.
There are minority communites in the US who tend to be traditionally conservative. . .
. . . but have been driven from the party by the GOP's embrace of white nationalists. You can't have a coalition of both minority communites and white nationalists.
The GOP has to be willing to lose a few elections while they regroup.
Will they?
Recall: When the Democrats embraced civil rights in the early 1960s, they knew they'd lose a few elections because they'd be losing one of their blocs of voters (white racists).
They embraced civil rights anyway because it was the right thing to do.
A particular bloc of voters were the core of the Democratic Party during the Confederacy and Jim Crow.
Now they're a majority of Republican voters.
They will not go away, nor will they suddenly fall in love with democracy and embrace diversity.
Spoiler: Yes, partly because the GOP isn't
conservative.
I think this is an interesting question. (Time to get philosophical 🤔)
The place to start, I think is how political psychologists define conservatism.
1/
2/ True conservatives, according to prof. @Jonhaidt, form a kind of yin-yang balance with liberals ted.com/talks/jonathan…
Liberals embrace forward-looking change.
Conservatives value order.
From Haidt: the conservative insight is that order is hard to achieve and easy to lose.
3/ Reactionaries, on the other hand seek rapid change—backwards to a bygone era.
Other political psychologists (see @karen_stenner) describe conservatives as embracing a desire to maintain the status quo.
No laws can protect a democracy if a clear majority of the citizens decide they no longer want a democracy because they will keep electing officials who will destroy rule of law.
🔹No, the pardons can't be overturned
🔹Corrupt pardons can be prosecuted as a separate crime
🔹Trump can't pardon himself, so if he pardons all the insurrectionists, he'll be left to take all the blame
🔹He'll hurt his chances of acquittal in the Senate
On the other hand, not pardoning them creates a problem for him because the insurrectionists might start to realize they were duped, and he needs his base.
You'd think some of his supporters will realize that he set them up: He encouraged them to commit a crime (assuring them they're saving the country) and then left them to face prison.
The idea is to take down a criminal organization by getting the Kingpin.
The conservative dilemma, in a nutshell is this: Conservatives tend to represent the wealth and powerful corporations, therefore the policies they advocate are not appealing to the majority of people.
In other words, they will have trouble winning elections.
2/
In the years since 1954, the Republican Party, while calling itself conservative, solved the conservative dilemma by bringing white nationalists and KKK types into the party, coddling them for their votes while trying to keep them on the sidelines.
3/