After Dunkirk, Britain's Home Forces were gripped by oh so many crises.
I mean seriously, the entire shebang was a complete and utter basket case.
It was clear that mobility was needed but many formations relied on requisitioned civilian transport, which tended to be rotten. /2
Some of our div cavalry regiments were still horsed, and there was no guarantees that we could reliably move battalions from town to town - let alone redeploy across the country in the event of an invasion.
Once more, necessity proved the mother of invention.
*gen horse pic* /3
Many strange reactionary units formed that summer, whether anti-tank companies without anti-tank guns or infantry battalions without rifles...
So much MT was lost in France.
Critical transport shortages choked the army.
There was no time for industry to immediately step up. /4
Having escaped France units that arrived back in Britain discovered that owing to catastrophic MT losses, there was no way to replace these vehicles.
So reforming divisions were reduced to being almost completely static formations. /5
Many Home Defence formations relied on Composite Companies, offering maybe a fifth of required capacity, even then juggling movement of troops, POL, supplies or ammunition.
God forbid more than one at once. /6
Since mobility and aggression would be needed to defeat any invasion force it was clear that in a rapid war of movement, such a static defensive force would be hamstrung.
To grant some mobility, Motor Coach Companies were swiftly formed in July (or so) 1940. /7
As you might guess these salubrious units were equipped with quickly modified civilian busses.
Window panes were removed and replaced with hinged boards or thick canvas blinds to allow quick debussing.
Some even had sliding roofs fitted and machine guns for air defence. /8
Major-General Bernard 'Monty' Montgomery was a very early proponent requisitioning enough London busses for 3rd Division.
Any reliable form of mobility was seen as an essential aid to commanders attempt to impart their will on the enemy, and cast any invader into the sea. /9
An infantry division required three motor coach companies, one for each brigade, and most of them initially consisted of a motley, random selection from civilian operators - meaning half a dozen different manufacturers' busses could be in the same company.
A nightmare. /10
Such busses initially came in civvie schemes, lingering until enough paint arrived.
Over time an attempt was made to restructure each Motor Coach Company to just one type of manufacturer's vehicles, and the majority bemoaned the ensuring deliveries of clapped out busses. /11
Very few drivers in 1940 were passably trained, many were effectively green conscripts - many of whom had barely handled a motor vehicle before.
There was no specialist training.
At least one driver was so scared of driving his bus that he tragically took his own life. /12
By July 1941 the invasion threat was ebbing to the point of near-irrelevance, not least as conventional transport companies were formed and filled the void.
Motor coach companies shifted back to become corps transport. /13
By early 1942 the majority of these units were finally equipped with proper transport vehicles.
Some became Troop Carrying Companies or given new roles by the RASC, such as bulk petrol transport, and once more literal embussing was once more consigned to history.* /14
Somewhat unsurprisingly these units were rarely photographed, lacking romance of armour; raw firepower of artillery, or interest of infantrymen, and became little more than a footnote in history. /15
That said, swift creation of Motor Coach Companies offered divisions their only real transport capability during the uncertain Summer of 1940. /thread
*Some military busses did linger into '45, as apparently below, but... suspect that's another (even nicher) tale.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So in Normandy, the British have Regiments of Sherman, Cromwell, and Churchill tanks.*
And like where does the DINKY LIL' STUART FIT IN????
Well...
It's a doozy. /1
*Well Canadians jus' get Armd Regts of Shermans but that's for another day... #WW2#SWW#History
By May 1944 the Stuart was increasingly anachronistic.
The 37mm gun was too light to really do much against modern armour, the tank's profile was surprisingly high and not massively dissimilar to a Sherman - but utterly lacking in comparative firepower and protection. /2
The Stuart was really a relic of a time when a quick, cheap, reliable, modular AFV was urgently needed using proven, readily available commercial parts.
The race for armament, firepower and mobility had left the tank rather behind. /3
21st Army Group had arguably the most enviable engineering services in the world, able to throw up bridges in under a day, construct massive hospitals, water points, fuel depots, pipelines, bypasses (frankly mini-motorways), airfields, command complexes... an exhaustive list. /2
One of their finest pieces of kit was the humble bulldozer, with a mix of D-4s, D-6s and D-7s (and probably more besides).
Need a dug in field hospital? Send a bulldozer in to clear 6 ft of earth and done in a few hours. /3
How did this piece of open topped herp-a-derp become the coolest piece of kit in infantry battalions scrapping through the liberation of North West Europe?*
The Universal Carrier came about in 1940 as a desire to streamline production processes & merge the Bren Gun and Scout Carriers' roles into a single AFV.
The former's name stuck and gained popular traction.
Bren Carrier (below) for Infantry Battalions' Carrier Platoons. /2
The Scout Carrier was intended to operate alongside Vickers Mk VI Light Tanks for Divisional Reconnaissance Regiments etc.
Various traits of both vehicles, bar the obvious Horstmann suspension, that carried over into the Universal Carrier are quite evident. /3
At 38 tons the Churchill was clearly a beast but a manageable one, given concerns about railway loading gauge had informed development (even then you still had to remove the side air louvres for rail tpt).
As always, compromise & industrial limitations underpinned design. /2
Early Mk I and Mk II were respectively armed with a 2 Pounder with coaxial Besa in the turret but with differing hull armament, I - 3" howitzer, II - Besa machine gun.
88.9mm of front armour provided excellent protection for the five man crew, and WS No. 19 provided comms. /3
So you're a company commander in Normandy, trying to coordinate your three platoons in action, & liase w supporting tanks & some arty, & keep battalion headquarters appraised, & adapt as needed.
The core set at Company HQ was the WS No. 18 set, linking in with WS No. 38 sets used by platoons & back to Battalion HQ.
0.25 Watts
6-9Mhz 2.5 miles range with R/T and 4 miles with W/T
Interference in woodlands/around armour /2
The 18 set was more durable than the WS No. 38, but much less powerful than the popular WS No. 19 and 22 sets... then again you can carry it about and not worry about a vehicle or cart for it in action. /3