Have you all learned nothing over the past few years?
You might want to duck because, I'm about to go on a tear . . .
The same people telling me we're doomed and democracy is dead are probably the same people who told me (1) Trump would make himself dictator (2) The Supreme Court would keep him in office and (3) he would never leave the White House.
Nobody owes you a democracy . . .
My mantra the past 4 years: democracy will survive if enough people want it to, and are willing to do the work.
Did the doomsday people happen to see that the vote was 55-45 in favor of holding a trial?
I think the problem is there has been so much peddling of hope porn. . .
There is no magic solution. No instant thing will suddenly make the dangerous extremists less dangerous.
The anti-democratic forces have been with us since the start of the nation.
None of this is new. Slavery was authoritarian. Jim Crow was authoritarian . . .
Women in the home was authoritarian.
We've had a brief period in American history (since the 1954 Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Board) in which we've moved toward becoming a true liberal democracy.
The backlash also started in 1954.
We're still riding the backlash. . .
The extremists are a significant percentage of the population. You can't build a big enough prison and put them all in it. You can't convert them and make them all comfortable in a liberal democracy.
All we can do is mobilize and start working on the next elections. . .
Because it's not over unless we all give up.
When we do, they win.Not before.
They fight hard. They lie and cheat. They make bad faith arguments. They encourage the spread of lies.
But we have the numbers.
Done.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🔹prosecuting without convicting can backfire.
🔹conviction won't loosen the support of his supporters. They are immune to truth.
Trump will say the jury was filled with Democrats. The GOP will say the prosecutions are revenge and authoritarian.
My point . . .
2/
. . . is that there are no instant solutions.
It's not like a gutsy prosecutor can bring charges and POOF the GOP will melt like the Wicked Witch and Trump will lose his grip on the Qanon people and Fox will start reporting the truth.
Spoiler: Yes, partly because the GOP isn't
conservative.
I think this is an interesting question. (Time to get philosophical 🤔)
The place to start, I think is how political psychologists define conservatism.
1/
2/ True conservatives, according to prof. @Jonhaidt, form a kind of yin-yang balance with liberals ted.com/talks/jonathan…
Liberals embrace forward-looking change.
Conservatives value order.
From Haidt: the conservative insight is that order is hard to achieve and easy to lose.
3/ Reactionaries, on the other hand seek rapid change—backwards to a bygone era.
Other political psychologists (see @karen_stenner) describe conservatives as embracing a desire to maintain the status quo.
No laws can protect a democracy if a clear majority of the citizens decide they no longer want a democracy because they will keep electing officials who will destroy rule of law.