🔹prosecuting without convicting can backfire.
🔹conviction won't loosen the support of his supporters. They are immune to truth.
Trump will say the jury was filled with Democrats. The GOP will say the prosecutions are revenge and authoritarian.
My point . . .
2/
. . . is that there are no instant solutions.
It's not like a gutsy prosecutor can bring charges and POOF the GOP will melt like the Wicked Witch and Trump will lose his grip on the Qanon people and Fox will start reporting the truth.
Want to know what would really help?
3/
What will really help is for Democrats to start gaining power in state legislatures and locally elections.
We saw the difference that made in this election.
Local politics matters.
4/
That's because convictions are more likely when the evidence is documentary.
When the evidence is largely testimonial, the jury decides who to believe.
With documents, a jury can't easily go against the weight of the evidence.
Spoiler: Yes, partly because the GOP isn't
conservative.
I think this is an interesting question. (Time to get philosophical 🤔)
The place to start, I think is how political psychologists define conservatism.
1/
2/ True conservatives, according to prof. @Jonhaidt, form a kind of yin-yang balance with liberals ted.com/talks/jonathan…
Liberals embrace forward-looking change.
Conservatives value order.
From Haidt: the conservative insight is that order is hard to achieve and easy to lose.
3/ Reactionaries, on the other hand seek rapid change—backwards to a bygone era.
Other political psychologists (see @karen_stenner) describe conservatives as embracing a desire to maintain the status quo.
No laws can protect a democracy if a clear majority of the citizens decide they no longer want a democracy because they will keep electing officials who will destroy rule of law.