I expect a pseudonymous founder to set up a contract-for-difference engine in some country. Maybe legal in some places, do your own diligence!
But that would allow *uncensorable* on-chain exposure to the price of every stock.
Basically, the way MakerDAO works is by putting the exchange rate of ETH/USD on chain. Through some transformations, that gets you a USD stablecoin called DAI.
But the same approach can be used to put ETH/GME, ETH/TESLA, ETH/ANYSTOCK on chain.
Which means multiple exchanges!
That is, rather than the current system where GME is listed only on a centralized exchange like NYSE, through a mechanism like this anyone can set up an exchange to trade a “contract for difference”.
Lets people buy/sell exposure to GME price even without NYSE access to shares.
One major caveat: CFD is banned in the US, so don’t do this if you are an American!
However, any country that wants to set up its own NYSE or NASDAQ could legalize on-chain CFD.
This really takes us into unprecedented terrain. It’s sort of like Napster for stocks.
@Falkvinge & the Pirate Party in Sweden could legalize on-chain CFD and it might do to Wall Street what file-sharing did to music. Overnight decentralization from NYC. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_Pa…
Of course there are OTC desks that do trades outside public NYSE/NASDAQ, and derivatives exchanges around the world, etc.
But feels different to just be able to clone the entire stock market on-chain. CFD doesn’t offer the exact properties of holding shares, but it’s similar.
In many ways, centralization of trading in NYC gives power to the establishment. Fees & regulation enabled by central chokepoints.
A country that legalized on-chain CFD (& more generally derivatives for anything) could decentralize revenue from Wall Street to their jurisdiction.
Aha. Looks like mirror.finance is doing exactly this. Generalizing the DAI model to allow synthetic assets for anything to be represented on-chain.
A country that fully legalized this, and that was prepared for a tussle with the US, could build a parallel Wall Street.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today showed us that the SEC has had it wrong. The problem isn’t that some cryptos may be securities. The problem is that all securities aren’t yet cryptos.
Now is the time to draft a bill that legalizes security tokens.
If all securities were represented on-chain:
- all users have self-custody of certificates
- brokerages can’t stop you from trading
- trading runs 24/7
- and settlement happens in minutes, not days
Basically, root cause is the antiquated financial backend. On-chain fixes this.
The stockchain
What we just observed was a technology problem that is being cast as a human problem. It was basically a Slashdotting of the legacy financial system, an unexpected workload that it isn’t prepared to handle. Putting stocks on chain really does fix this.
We don’t know all the facts yet. It is quite possible Robinhood was leaned on by the SEC, a banking partner, or one of many other regulators / regulated entities they are beholden to.
We’re seeing the limits of fintech vs crypto in real-time. Not your rails, not your stocks.
OK, here *may* be why Robinhood & other brokerages shut down trading.
Not because evil. Because they can't afford the cost!
Due to the volatility of these stocks, their partners now (understandably) want cash up front. No one wants to be holding the bag. finance.yahoo.com/video/heres-wh…
This is plausible to me & similar to the kinds of thing that happen in crypto when there is an unexpected surge in price.
If true, it's a supply chain issue due to slow settlement times. No one wants to take principal risk on a ton of highly volatile assets.
☀️ The city of Miami just posted the #Bitcoin whitepaper on their website! This is a simple but powerful move that any jurisdiction can make to show they are in favor of technological progress. Who will follow Miami's example?
Here is Representative @PatrickMcHenry of the House Financial Services Committee standing up for open source innovation in finance by posting the Bitcoin whitepaper!
The long-term consequence is the end of the 20th century regulatory state.
The SEC is set up to go after Goldman, not 1M retail investors. The FDA was built to regulate Merck, not 1M people with personal genomes. And the FAA is meant to leash Boeing, not 1M drone hobbyists. 🧵
For the SEC to go after all the countless sympathetic individuals on Reddit who profited off the back of a giant fund isn’t just logistically difficult.
It’s *reputationally* difficult.
It’s like the RIAA suing its own customers. You are pursuing the little guy...why exactly?
Lyn is very smart — but Ethereum really isn’t that early in development anymore. Just from a numbers standpoint, it’s a $100B+ platform hosting multiple billion dollar projects. See defipulse.com.
That doesn’t begin to touch the tech innovation, which is substantial.
I don’t think it’s persuasive to say “Ethereum is still rapidly innovating therefore it’s not worth $100B+”.
Actually, for a platform worth $100B+ to still be rapidly innovating is a very positive signal. Excessive risk aversion is the ultimate risk. businessinsider.com/amazons-jeff-b…
Perhaps the most important difference between a tech investor and a macro investor (like @LynAldenContact) is that Lyn explicitly says she wants to invest in “finished products”.
The human rights argument for crypto as a balance against centralized power of all kinds, from nation states to corporations, is more obvious every day.
People tried popularizing decentralized systems like Tor without the economic component. It didn’t fully work, because these systems are tricky to build and maintain.
But digital assets now provide an offsetting term that more than compensates for the technical complexity.
Crypto allows open source developers to finally capture some of the value they create. They can choose how much.
But it’s an important and general tool to address the funding gaps that @nayafia talked about in her recent book.