3) How tight is the correlation between maternal blood antibody levels and infant umbilical cord blood antibody levels? A whopping r=0.89! That’s incredibly high!
Cord blood IgG concentrations were positively correlated with maternal IgG concentrations (r = 0.886; P < .001).
4) So 72 of 83 antibody positive mothers (87%) transferred IgG antibodies. What about the other 11?
Of 11 moms who were seropositive with infants who were seronegative:
5 moms were seropositive with IgM.
other 6 moms had really low IgG.
So explainable excerptions.
5) Transfer ratios (how much relative antibody transferred from mom to infant) were not different among infants born to mothers with asymptomatic or symptomatic illness (or severity)
This is huge too.
6) also, among 26 women with mild, moderate, or critical #COVID19, with term delivery and positive PCR test result prior to delivery— the **longer time the PCR test was before delivery (longer ago illness), the more antibodies** mom transferred to infant. (r = 0.620; P < .001).
7) the “findings are aligned with studies of vaccine-elicited antibodies to pertussis, rubella, hepatitis B, and influenza, where cord sera/maternal sera transfer ratios ranging from 0.8 to 1.7 have been observed.”
8) “We did not observe a significant difference in transfer efficiency comparing infants born preterm, but this finding was likely affected by small numbers (n = 9) of preterm infants, with the earliest born at 31 weeks’ gestation. Further studies will be needed for preterm”
9) “When vaccines are widely available, the optimal timing of maternal vaccination during pregnancy will need to consider maternal and fetal factors including the time needed to ensure neonatal protection.”
➡️Potentially maybe vaccinate moms earlier for maybe more protection.
10) that said—“Further studies are needed to determine if SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are protective against newborn infection; if so, at what concentration; and whether the transplacental kinetics of vaccine-elicited antibodies are similar to naturally acquired antibodies.”
11) An accompanying editorial notes that “While there is a potential for some protection from breast milk antibodies in lactating infants, this might be limited and less effective than protection from transplacental antibodies.” jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
12) oped writer notes that in “neonatal varicella infection, higher likelihood of infection and more severe neonatal disease in infants born to mothers infected perinatally who are unable to provide passive protection to their newborns.”
Thus — antibody transfer is key.
13) Although more study needed, Dr Muñoz notes: “However, the timing of maternal vaccination to protect the infant, as opposed to the mother alone, would necessitate an adequate interval from vaccination to delivery (of at least 4 weeks)...”
14) “When considering that up to 2 weeks from complete vaccination (2-dose series with 21 or 28 days or more between doses with current COVID-19 vaccines) is necessary for higher efficacy of the vaccine and that transplacental transfer begins around 17 weeks (before birth)
15) “...increasing exponentially as gestation advances and the placenta grows, maternal vaccination starting in the early second trimester of gestation might be optimal to achieve the highest levels of antibodies in the newborn.”
16) “If what we know about other important vaccine-preventable diseases in infants for which maternal vaccination is recommended (tetanus, pertussis, influenza) or under investigation (respiratory syncytial virus) holds true...”
17) ...”transplacentally acquired antibody rapidly decays by the 2nd month of life & continues to drop so that by 6-12 months, protective efficacy is reduced. Available data on the effect of COVID-19 in newborns and infants suggests that severe disease may occur in early life.”
18) Bottomline: It is promising that mother to infant transfer of IgG antibodies to #SARSCoV2 occurs in high frequency, and could maybe yield protection in future studies if what we know from other studies is true. And while not forever, might protect in critical early infancy.
19) Lots of questions about kids vaccines—they are doing more trials in kids. Results likely late spring or summer—doing more precise dosing studies for kids because of variable body sizes. Some vaccines in China may have pediatric vaccine data by March.
20) two other key studies on convalescent plasma therapy — of transfusing plasma with high antibody concentrations - for prevention of severe #COVID19. Read thread 🧵 below.
NEW—A single dose of Oxford-AstraZeneca #COVID19 vaccine provided strong protection in trials after the first 22 days: 76% efficacy (days 22-90). Also, when 2nd shot were delayed by >3 months: ~82% efficacy for symptomatic disease. But poor efficacy for asymptomatic disease. 🧵
2) And stronger effect for longer time gap was also supported by stronger neutralization in pseudovirus assays that showed improvements with longer gap. Thus, not a fluke. Longer time gap >12 weeks, the stronger vaccine effects. poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?I…
3) Visualized in specific days, it is apparent there is an overall rise in efficacy after 90 days, though it gets thin in the extreme tails.
But in panel C with the low 1st dose, standard 2nd dose, maybe efficacy does seemingly climb into the mid 90s% (exploratory analysis)
BREAKING—analysis of Russian #SARSCoV2 vaccine’s phase 3 trial with ~ 20,000 participants finds that a 2-dose regimen has an efficacy of 91.6% against symptomatic #COVID19. No serious adverse events were deemed to be associated with vaccination. 100% efficacy for severe illness.
2) The benefits of the vaccine diverged from placebo around day ~18 after the first shot.
Estimated vaccine efficacy occurring at any time after dose 1 was 73·1% (95% CI 63·7–80·1). Notably, in vaccine group, most cases of #COVID19 occurred before dose 2 thelancet.com/journals/lance…
3) Notably, vaccine efficacy was 91·8% (67·1–98·3) in participants older than 60 years.
There were no cases (vaccine group) and 20 cases (placebo group) of moderate or severe COVID-19 confirmed at least 21 days after dose 1
Zerg evolve super fast & their swarms are unstoppable once they mutate/evolve and infect widely.
➡️Terrans can win only if stop Zerg early, or tech upgrade fast. Which means lockdown & vaccinate fast.
2) But Zerg always try to counter by exploiting the map by establishing more colonies because they can create hatcheries quickly. Zerg always have expansion advantage over Terran humans. And if Terran try to expand, Zerg simply mutate to more advanced species.
3) Terrans are great at bunkering and using siege tanks + turrets, but this defense strategy never works to win a direct Terran vs Zerg battle. Zerg swarms will simply always outnumber human Terran armies if we sit back complacently. Zergs will always bring Ultralisks.
BREAKING—CDC released 1st month vaccine report. Just under 13 million vaccinated over 30 days, or just ~431k per day. Relative to US pop, blacks & Latinos are underrepresented, though partly to HCW & elderly.
NOT GOOD—so it seems 🇬🇧 government researchers have discovered that the already more contagious #B117 has further acquired the other troublesome E484K mutation seen in 🇿🇦#B1351 & 🇧🇷#P1 variants—in 11 patients. E484k is blamed for partial vaccine-evasion.🧵 assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
2) Moreover, they believe the 11 samples of #b117 variant that acquired the new E484K acquired them independently of each other (not just one single origin). This suggests convergent evolution taking place—where it evolves to acquire E484K separately—which indicates it is key.
3) One expert thinks it’s because the E484K might enhance another mutation seen in #B117, thereby letting the virus “grip” the human ACE2 receptor (targeted entry portal into human cells) stronger in a more stable way.