SO MANY right-wing outfits pushing hard-right bullshit about "free speech".
This new one is "The Campaign for Common Sense"🤮
which demonizes any organisation explicitly fighting inequality - it's inviting people to list them, so it can demonize organisations like the #NHS.
The "Common Sense" gang are amplifying another new right-wing outfit called "Counter Weight", which provides "practical information & expert guidance to resist the imposition of the ideology that calls itself “Critical Social Justice” on your day-to-day life."
Jesus wept.
Here's ANOTHER dodgy right-wing outfit called "free speech champions", this one pushed by ex-Brexit Party grifter & Telegraph, Spectator & Spiked favourite Inaya Folarin, herself the founder of "The Equiano Project" with the usual demonization of #BLM, Critical Race Theory etc
This network of hard-right grifters seems to be coordinated in demonizing anti-racism organisations, pushing retrograde hard-right ideology & pretending to champion free speech - which it uses to demonize anyone they disagree with.
They all seem very shy about who funds them.
If anyone is interested in a decent demolition of the "intellectual argument" of these ill-informed unhinged grifters, who blame "postmodernism" (despite pushing a pathetic misreading of thinkers associated with it) & "The Woke" for basically everything:
"Propagandists taught the corporation to be able to do what the ‘failing’ liberal state would not: manage the lives of the publics to provide security, stability, and profit to the corporation, all while maintaining the façade of democracy and free conduct" - Cory Wimberley.
"Propagandists believed that democracy was the new religion of the masses and, like any supernatural prejudice, it was not held by reason but the tight grip of images, symbols, and catchphrases on public psychology."
"When the publics can be shaped and their desires managed, then democracy need not threaten corporations because the will of the people is another item produced alongside bars of soap, worker morale, and political candidates."
The claim that the wealthiest 1% in the UK pay 27% of the tax is a grotesque lie, creating a misleading narrative, which the press & broadcast news media have been amplifying for years.
The truth is that over three-quarters of the Government’s income comes from other taxes.
It's also a myth that Britain has an unusually high marginal rates of income tax.
In the UK it's 47% on incomes over £150,000.
Belgium (50%), Israel (50%), Senegal (50%), USA (52%), Spain (52%), Sweden (52%), Japan (55%), Denmark (55%), Austria (55%).
What Britain DOES have, is FORTY-FIVE billionaires.
New research analysing #r4today, raises questions about clarity, accuracy & impartiality in @BBCNews' senior broadcast journalists’ choice of language, where their choice of words & identifiers can be seen as undermining the @BBC's impartiality.
Several senior @BBCNews journalists adopt the first-person plural “we” when reporting on matters of public policy.
The evidence suggests that more fine-grained guidelines on permissible circumstances for @BBC journalists’ usage of “we” & “our” need revising & disseminating.
Following the widely unreported news that Boris Johnson is facing growing condemnation for an “appalling” Tory alliance with neo-Nazi & anti-Muslim parties across Europe, it reminded me how little traction Tory #antisemtism has got in the news since 2015.
I think most people are aware of Boris Johnson's book '72 Virgins', with its references to Jews controlling the media, Arabs with “hook noses” & “slanty eyes” & the mentions of “pikeys” & "coffee-coloured “half-castes”, so I won't dwell on it.
In October 2016, many pointed out the similarities between May's "If you believe you are a citizen of the world, you're a citizen of nowhere", & the language used by Hitler in Mein Kampf, & in Stalin's anti-"rootless cosmopolitan" campaign against Jews.
In pre-Leveson 2007/8, a Select Committee on Communications examined "The ownership of the #news".
With the imminent launch of Fox-News-Style #GBNews AND Rupert Murdoch's #NewsUK, I just wanted to highlight some of the entirely sensible recommendations:
374. "The relationship between policy makers and the media is a legitimate area of public interest. We therefore propose that politicians in all parties are open & candid about their meetings with media owners & editors."
375. "We do not accept that the increase of news sources invalidates the case for special treatment of the media through ownership regulation. There is still a danger that if media ownership becomes too concentrated the diversity of voices available could be diminished."