In pre-Leveson 2007/8, a Select Committee on Communications examined "The ownership of the #news".
With the imminent launch of Fox-News-Style #GBNews AND Rupert Murdoch's #NewsUK, I just wanted to highlight some of the entirely sensible recommendations:
374. "The relationship between policy makers and the media is a legitimate area of public interest. We therefore propose that politicians in all parties are open & candid about their meetings with media owners & editors."
375. "We do not accept that the increase of news sources invalidates the case for special treatment of the media through ownership regulation. There is still a danger that if media ownership becomes too concentrated the diversity of voices available could be diminished."
376. "An internal company structure cannot be an adequate substitute for competition law & statutory regulation in ensuring that no single voice becomes too powerful. Regulation to ensure a plurality of media ownership is still relevant & necessary."
377. "The public interest considerations for newspaper mergers and broadcasting and cross-media mergers should be amended to refer specifically to a need to establish whether a merger will impact adversely on news gathering."
380. "@Ofcom should be given the power to initiate the Public Interest Test" as Ofcom "has a duty to promote the interests of the citizen."
381. "Legislation should be amended so that Ofcom investigates media mergers only on the basis of the public interest criteria".
382. "When @Ofcom considers the public interest considerations of a media merger it should be required to put the needs of the citizen ahead of the needs of the consumer."
387. "The strength of @BBCNews is its reporters & those that support them. Between them they provide a depth & range of news which is among the best in the world. We believe that NOTHING should be allowed to reduce the @BBC’s ability to sustain this high quality news operation."
389. "We emphatically believe that Public Service Broadcasting cannot be left to the @BBC alone. A continuing plurality of public service broadcasters should be an aim of public policy. This is particularly crucial for news and current affairs."
"@Ofcom’s research shows that the public values this plurality, especially in news. It also serves the valuable purpose of providing competition for the @BBC. We urge Ofcom to make news provision a priority on the #PSBs when it comes to negotiating future service obligations."
393. "We believe there is scope in the idea of sharing @BBC facilities with other public service broadcasters and that this proposal should be further examined. The Government should take forward this work."
396. "@Ofcom should work to define more systematically “high-quality” news (&) produce an annual report monitoring the quality & quantity of #PSB news & Ofcom should also develop a mechanism for holding companies responsible if their news falls short of quality thresholds."
400. "Any weakening of the impartiality requirements.. would have a negative impact in the quality & trustworthiness of the country’s news. Such a move would not benefit the public or journalists & could run the risk of undermining the most important medium for news."
Since 2015, the proportion of British people who trust most news, most of the time, has fallen from 51% to 40%.
Trust in journalists as a profession is at an all time low & you don't have to be a media expert to know why: contrarian partisan dumbed-down news attracts ad revenue.
Imho #GBNews & #NewsUK will help trust deteriorates further: audiences should NOT be framed as passive 'consumers' rather than active 'citizens'. Impartial, intelligent & nuanced news is an essential component of a decent democracy. Concentrated press ownership is a disaster.
We know what needs to be done, what people want, AND what is in the PUBLIC interest when positioned as citizens rather than consumers:
1 DON'T let influential people get away with lying.
I should add that decline in trust & faith in news & journalism mainly benefits the grotesquely wealthy & already powerful, & its no coincidence that the demonization & defunding of journalism has contributed to the rise of what Nick Davies calls #churnalism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Following the widely unreported news that Boris Johnson is facing growing condemnation for an “appalling” Tory alliance with neo-Nazi & anti-Muslim parties across Europe, it reminded me how little traction Tory #antisemtism has got in the news since 2015.
I think most people are aware of Boris Johnson's book '72 Virgins', with its references to Jews controlling the media, Arabs with “hook noses” & “slanty eyes” & the mentions of “pikeys” & "coffee-coloured “half-castes”, so I won't dwell on it.
In October 2016, many pointed out the similarities between May's "If you believe you are a citizen of the world, you're a citizen of nowhere", & the language used by Hitler in Mein Kampf, & in Stalin's anti-"rootless cosmopolitan" campaign against Jews.
"Tens of thousands of #austerity deaths. The haunting memory of #Grenfell Tower & its fatal cladding. The #Windrush scandal. #FoodBanks as far as the eye can see. The twin horrors of the #Covid crisis & #Brexit bedlam."
"A pro-death-penalty Home Secretary with a black-belt certificate in actual bullying. Toby Young, Darren Grimes and Laurence Fox cunting around every TV channel and internet site as they pretend they're being silenced."
"When else in history have the purportedly censored sounded so unbearably loud? Political correctness – that fusty old Enlightenment idea of making an effort to treat people fairly & equally – is castigated as the worst possible tyranny imaginable."
When trust in political institutions & politicians falls, as it has in the #UK, #USA & #Brazil, trust in the news media is dragged down with it.
And societal polarization means even the best news coverage can come to be seen as biased by large sections of the population.
People’s perception of #journalism & the #news media is influenced by their perception of other institutions, & by cues provided by politicians & other elites, who increasingly aggressively & explicitly attack independent news media & question journalists’ integrity & motives.
It's OK be wrong. We can't always be right. More importantly, we need to value having the confidence to change our mind in light of new, reliable, & credible information or evidence - even if it contradicts what we previously thought. Imho, that shows REAL strength of character.
ONE major problem we face is that our current commercial print & broadcast news is increasingly partisan & combative, disproportionately features views which align with powerful interests, too often denies complexity & nuance, & avoids the measured & impartial framing of stories.
In a context of hyper-free-market capitalism in the UK & USA, it's clear that very powerful & grotesquely wealthy individuals disproportionately own & influence much of the press & broadcast news in order to help shape public opinion & Govt policy, & thus protect their interests.
BAD NEWS for COVID-deniers & anti-vaxxers: to counter their viral #misinformation at a time when #COVID19 vaccines are being rolled out, new research has produced a “psychological vaccine” against misinformation, in the form of online games (links below).
Rather than simply exposing #misinformation, new research focuses on the more general ways in which people are misled – #manipulation techniques such as the use of excessively emotional language, the construction of conspiracy theories, & the false testimony of fake experts.
In a series of online games, players learn how #misinformation works from the inside by being encouraged to create their own fake news: Bad News is about misinformation in general, Harmony Square is about political misinformation, & Go Viral! about misinformation around #COVID19.