@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber The exam question is set by @GeorgePeretzQC who sets out the spectrum of choice between EU's slow, formalistic State Aid regime - which requires pre-notification and has long infuriated UK ministers - and the "open sea" approach where only courts act as a check on subsidy /2
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber Post #Brexit, as @jamesrwebber points out, we really don't need EU-style regime which was designed to create level playing field among 27 countries all with control over their own tax/economic policies...we can have a nimbler system better suited to the UK. But what system? /3
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber Because you do need a system. As @AlexanderPHRose
has observed the current situation where authorities have to assess subsidies based on principles in TCA + NI Protocol is messy and unproven, creates a significant burden on those who don't have bandwidth to make those calls /4
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber Which is why the Government has launched a consultation on exactly what the system UK Subsidy Control system should look like, and what powers the Independent Authority should have - its not completely straightforward. /5
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber James Webber @jamesrwebber sets out a vision here that warns against the UK sinking too far back towards an EU-style system - we need something that attracts investment; boosts collaboration between government and private sector innovators etc. /6
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber But as @GeorgePeretzQC says the rub is that too loose a system has the perverse effect of actually inhibiting that process because private investors want certainty - if there's risk that Govt funding gets withdrawn under legal challenge they'll not invest /7
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber Or as he puts it: "lenders...might be reluctant to commit money if there is a risk of state funding getting withdrawn — so the risk is that people end up taking very cautious views, ‘sticking close to nurse’ because they are terrified of taking a decision." /8
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber This is because while some Subsidy decisions are clear cut, it's the grey areas that cause trouble - the value-judgments on a subsidy that might be distortionary, but yet justified on policy grounds, but arguably could have been done cheaper or in a less distortionary way /9
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber Leave aside the separate question of whether a subsidy is distortionary to EU trade and so cuts across the TCA, this is about getting a nimble, working regime for the UK that drives the government's levelling up agenda, that makes Britain work better, for Britain.../10
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber To make life easier, as @AlexanderPHRose has advocated, the UK can create Safe Harbours (rough equivalent of EU block exemptions) to clearly rule 'in' types of subsidy, and it could apply these more flexibly. And recall that given pre-notification isn't a feature, more nimbly /11
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber It's this balance between having enough clarity to create certainty, while retaining enough flexibility for speed and creativity - and it's fascinating how the legal eagles all subtly disagree on this, which tells you how tricky an area this is /12
@FinancialTimes@GeorgePeretzQC@AlexanderPHRose@jamesrwebber But it will be important to regional development policy and the manner in which this government, having shackled the country to a punishing Canada-style trade deal, does try and reap a #Brexit dividend. Spoiler alert, it'll be more complicated than they'd have you believe. ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🤔🤔🤔🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨NEW: post #brexit immigration rules are shaping up to kill the au pair industry - on which 45,000 working families depend for affordable childcare. Seems mad. Stay with me. /1
First, what is an 'au pair' - sometimes assumed to be childcare for posh folk - but actually its really a childcare solution for doctors, police, nurses, single parents who have jobs that need reliable, affordable, full-time childcare. The can't afford nannies at £2k/pcm /2
So they an 'au pair', which is a kind of cultural exchange. A young person (90%+ from EU/EEA) aged 18-26 comes to live in your house, they get contribution to English lessons, board and lodging and £100/week 'pocket money' in exchange for 25 hours childcare - it works /3
The easy answer is that the Protocol has to survive - not least because there isn't any obvious alternative to it, and ultimately no appetite to find one in Brussels, London or Dublin. That doesn't mean it going to be easy now... /2
The Protocol - lest we forget, which the EU seemed to last Friday - is there to prevent a return to a hard border on the Island of Ireland, and if the first month of operation of the Irish Sea border shows, that border needs to be between GB & NI. /3
Its a @FinancialTimes#Brexit Briefing exclusive - @Port_of_Dover has shared their January traffic figures...you can see truck throughput (both directions, combined) is returning to "normal" levels. BUT...there's a 'but' 1/
@FinancialTimes@Port_of_Dover What this doesn't show you is how many are running empty from GB-EU (so EU hauliers can avoid getting caught in customs foul ups) and what that is doing for freight rates, which anecdotally are rising fast. /2
@FinancialTimes@Port_of_Dover Normally an estimated 30% go back empty from UK to EU (trade imbalances) but French authorities estimate it at about 50% and but @RHARodMcKenzie estimates it could be 65% based on members information. /3
Holding statement from @michaelgove after meeting with @MarosSefcovic - but quite different moods in London and Brussels on this. U.K. really feels need to push to make NI Protocol changes, per Gove letter. EU sees slippery slope if it moves too far.../1
NI trade groups really backing need for substantial moves - and U.K. view that the Article 16 debacle really has destabilised process in Northern Ireland...EU is still sticking to script on Protocol being consequence of @BorisJohnson decisions. /2
So from EU perspective for example the six month “grace period” on say sausages coming from GB is NOT to find time for a “fix” but time for NI to sort out supply chains that reflect reality of U.K. decision to put border in Irish Sea/3
Retail groups backing @michaelgove calls for extension of grace periods for phasing in full export health controls... @MichaelAodhan of @the_brc says controls need to be "pragmatic" and over a "workable timeframe". /1
@michaelgove@MichaelAodhan@the_brc@FinancialTimes “In the short term there are a number of issues which I would not describe as teething problems — they are significant issues which bear on the lives of people in Northern Ireland, which do need to be resolved,” Mr Gove said. /3
🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺💄👠👗💅🏻🕺💃🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨
UK’s £35bn fashion industry warns of “decimation” from #brexit - big names sign open letter to @BorisJohnson urging action. Many of 50,000 SMEs on the rack due to VAT, customs and work permit issues. Stay with me/1 on.ft.com/36tqUcE
@BorisJohnson You can read the full text of the letter here, co-ordinated by Fashion Round Table @FashionRoundTab, but tl;dr it says that #Brexit has left a "gaping hole" in an industry that relies of free movement of professionals. It's a familiar cry /2
@BorisJohnson@FashionRoundTab The industry, already whacked by #COVID19, is now discovering that cross-border sales are a horror (VAT, Customs, long delays) and models, stylists, photographers that used to blat around Europe can't any more. They need permits, for themselves, for their gear /3