Thread by @Steve_Sailer

I am back from Twitter Gulag after 2 weeks. On 1/25/21, Twitter told me I must delete 2 "hateful" tweets (click below) to be allowed on Twitter, unless I appealed, to which they promised to "respond as soon as possible."

I appealed, but 2 weeks later: no response.

My first "hateful" tweet pointed out the fact that only 14 unarmed blacks were shot dead by cops in 2020, according to the Washington Post's database. (The WP's count has since gone up to 15). Try it for yourself at:

washingtonpost.com/graphics/inves…

My banned Tweet then went on to mention three famous BLM martyrs (Michael Brown, Ahmaud Arbery, and Rayshard Brooks) who were unarmed at the start of their confrontations but who then grabbed for weapons, after which they were shot dead.

My second tweet that was banned by Twitter as purportedly "hateful" referenced the 1/13/2021 National Review article "2020’s Spike in Urban Homicides Should Not Be a Mystery" by Prof. Robert Cherry.

nationalreview.com/2021/01/2020s-…

I am an anti-murder activist who attempts to raise awareness of the causes of 2020's record-shattering increase in murders (about 30% over 2019), probably more than double the previous worst-ever increase in murders over the last 60 years.

In particular, I try to point out the role of The Establishment's rhetoric of racial hate in having helped cause the thousands of extra murders seen during the Racial Reckoning of 2020. That this makes me seem "hateful" to tech monopolists is hardly surprising.

When Twitter says that it will "respond as soon as possible" if you refuse to delete your "hateful" tweets but instead appeal Twitter's accusation, Twitter really means:

I waited 2 full weeks for Twitter to "respond as soon as possible" to my appeal, but got no response. The following reference to 14 days seems threatening, so I deleted the 2 tweets.

We shall see if Twitter gets revenge for my posting screenshots of their censorship.