If a Republican Congress tried pulling on a former Democrat president what the Dems did today with doctored, edited and misrepresented videos, BLM (Big Lib Media) would destroy it.
Many @HouseDemocrats openly called for and/or excused mass violence in recent years in ways that Trump never did, and those words were followed by violence not seen from Trump’s side. Instead of @AndrewCMcCarthy calling out this and the doctored nature of the Dem video, Andy
joins the pile on.
Piling on is what many Cons do when Dems put up an act that is echo chambered by BLM (Big Lib Media).
I sometimes wonder what value Con Media bring to the table. They don׳t drive a pro-Con narrative. They instead ignore Dem misdeeds and/or pile onto the GOP.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This reminds me of the Steele Dossier which was practically a product of a DNC/HRC contractor colluding with Russia to smear Trump that Trump is the colluder.
Diabolical.
A Russian collusion product was key in investigating if Trump colluded.
Same idea is happening here.
Namely, if Democrats had accepted Trump as a legitimate president they would not dare impeach him as a former president.
So... Dems are persecuting Trump for not accepting 2020 by a tool that is in use only because Dems did still not accept 2016.
The fraud nature of the vote by @MittRomney@BillCassidy@BenSasse etc is evident that none of them call for the House GOP to bring up impeachment of former Dem presidents Obama/Clinton. Those 6 GOP Senators were not even on the forefront to uncover 2016 Obama DOJ abuses.
Senator Leahy is the presiding “judge” of the impeachment but he is also a vote/juror in it.
Feds used bank records to harass someone for the suspicion of being in DC on 1/6/21 as if merely being there is a crime. Victim cleared of wrong doing.
DC resident’s cell signal was used to track her. Feds visited. Turns out she was out on a stroll that day.
The blatant crushing of civil-liberties by the Wray KGB is ignored because it was a “terrorist attack” in @jaketapper’s words. It was “an attack on democracy.” It was a “coup.” It was “sedition.”
Once you apply those crazy words, media/politicos agree to gov abuses of citizens.
Cute how DC GOPs, Dems and Media condemn Putin for arresting people who pushed police officers while those same people ignore or back that the FBI is using bank/cell signal records to chase down people who did no riot or even trespass on 1/6/21.
1/ Selling when you are down is THE way to lose money because you have no chance to earn anything back if things rise.
When I am down steep on a stock, I buy more. This brings down my average buy price; losses start to recover sooner and it can turn profitable sooner too.
I moved into $MJ at $30. Then at $20. Then at $10.50.
My average buy price dropped to $17.00
It crashed to under $9.
Then it rose, and rose and rose. It hit today $23.88.
Losses long recovered. Gains are here too.
3/ Newcomers’ mistakes don’t start with selling when down.
The mistake starts by chasing stocks on the upswing (I did not touch #GME), and another mistake is buying their full hand at the start. I place only 40% of my would-be hand. If it rises, great. If it crashes, I buy more.
Imagine CNN/MSNBC hosts behaved this way when Dems undermined the legitimacy of the 2016 election.
Never works this way. Always the “new media” and “Con Media” who roll along with whatever Old Media decides is good or bad, but then new/con media whine how unfair old media are.
“The courts have also supoorted that view,” says the @newsmax host which is a lie since most cases were dumped due to standing or calendar issues; not based on evidence hearings about the merit of the case. And... Courts did find some issues despite trying to sidestep it
The host sandbags Lindell from the get go by lowering his mic and having a statement ready too so why bring him on in the first place?
And no, @newsmax has no legal liability if a guest makes a claim. If yes then 3/4 of CNN/MSNBC shows can be taken off air.