First of all, night trains only really make sense for routes that most people would not try to accomplish in the daytime by 🚅
Paris-Brive, Paris-Clermont F, Lyon-Toulouse are all under 5 hours by daytime train. These will not work as night train connections
Second, that you *could* theoretically run a train at night does not necessarily mean you should
Paris-Albi for example is 7 hours daytime train, because the infra is lousy. And you can drive it faster
Third, speed is not so important at night, but it doesn't not matter
Paris-Perpignan is 5 hours by TGV, would be 10 hours by night train (if night train uses only non-highspeed lines)
That means running night trains on high speed lines needs to be discussed... especially in France and Spain, to a lesser extent in Germany, Belgium, Italy where partial use (at 200 to possibly 230km/h) is already possible
Fourth, for the comfort of night train passengers you need to operate on the 3 + 6 + 3 hours system (roughly) - essentially 3 hours to pick up passengers, 6 hours in the middle of the night with no stops, and 3 hours in the morning to drop of passengers
Yes, some night trains (esp. in Russia!) stop everywhere at any hour, but if night trains are to be a comfortable alternative to flying, that's no good - 6 hours of calm to allow people to sleep is the minimum
That's why this sort of map - via @Koelschlenny - is so good. It has 6 hour core routes, with regional additions
By all means quibble with whether these are the right routes for the French context, but the way of thinking is right I think
Fifth, pretty much any thinking about night trains in the European Union... inevitably means international routes.
There are a few routes in 🇫🇷🇩🇪🇸🇪🇫🇮🇷🇴 that are purely national, but most are not
That then leads us to the biggest headache of all: who can actually *run* these routes? Sure, the French state can give a bit of a bung to SNCF, but that's not going to sort Marseille-Madrid or Zürich-Barcelona for you
I've been pointed towards this by @hanskundnani by @MaryFitzger - entitled "What does it mean to be “pro-European” today?" While there is something to it, I think it mixes up different terms, and hence it's not quite right... This 🧵 will explain
I am also of course aware the title might not be Hans's choice...
The first issue is a basic one: to be a European, or to be a pro-European, are not - in my view - the same things
2/13
I will happily call myself a European, but not a pro-European (although plenty would describe *me* as the latter), because pro-European leads us to looking at the European Union in terms of more or less of it, rather than the individual policy outcomes it can produce
A short 🧵 about Ursula von der Leyen - not least in response to critique of me labelling her a "second rate" politician earlier
"Second rate" is not quite right. Perhaps "politician with an unusual combination of strengths and weaknesses" is better.
1/10
The central issue is where and when vdL is a classic insider, and where she is an outsider
vdL is daughter of Ernst Albrecht, previously CDU Ministerpräsident in Lower Saxony - so in and of the party en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Alb…
2/10
Yet other aspects set her apart. She is a women in a male dominated party (Merkel of course being the other major exception), and a protestant in a party dominated by catholics. And she's a medical doctor in a political system dominated by lawyers.
🇪🇺 sees the reality of how checks are going to have to work - for both sides - and sees any slippage of timetables as a problem. If 🇬🇧 cannot meet the 1 July deadline - just like any Brexit deadline - the question is *WHEN* it can, not *IF* it can or will
2/10
🇬🇧 sees it differently. Complying is costly and onerous, requires IT systems, sites for checks, and training of staff - so it pays lip service to complying, but keeps it vague as to how and when it will comply - the Government does not actually *DO* the necessary
Note: Gove (and the UK Government) can only get away with this because it is only about Northern Ireland, and v few Tory backbenchers really care about NI.
The EU response should be seen in this context - Gove is losing *no* political capital by announcing this.
Note: this is no comment on what *should* happen, but a comment on the politics of this, UK side.
This also should not be seen as a template for any sort of grace periods for the rest of the UK - because for that to happen Tory backbenchers *will* scream.
This is of course a rather inevitable development - the UK was *not* ready for the implications of Brexit on Northern Ireland, as pretty much every expert pointed out. And it is better to acknowledge this than be in a state of permanent denial.
58 locations of really nerdy EU stuff - places were Treaties were signed, places where EU institutions and agencies are located
And these are not *just* EU institution buildings in Brussels. That'd be too boring...
If any of these locations are wrong, or there are places you think I should add (I have only 3 that relate to historical people in the EU - if you know where someone was born or buried that would be excellent)