Here’s my thoughts with BTC lending as this cycle heats up. During the previous cycle we saw BTC prices jump from 10,000 to 20,000 in 16 days. This means that if the borrower overcollateralized with an LTV of 50%, their escrow will be liquidated (unless margin is met)...1/
within half a month. Now, what happens if this cycle produces growth that keeps running at double the price action in another 16 days from there? Well, it means those that just met the previous margin calls, now only have 4 days to respond to the next. So what does 2/
this mean for spreads? It means borrowers start to disappear from the market...which also means the spreads in the derivative market don’t get market makers to service the short-side of the trade. For lending/borrowing platforms that are completely overcollateralized, there 3/
shouldn’t be any problems for the depositors, but if lending/borrowing platforms are cutting corners for some of their borrowers (and they aren’t overcollateralized), the borrowers ability to meet margin calls due to counter-party risks in other parts of their portfolio mix ...4/
could cause systematic risk for all participants of the borrowing/lending platform. This is why transparency on borrowing/lending platforms are paramount to long-term trust and growth in the industry. I suspect the risk to lending/borrowing platforms is actually....5/
more severe for upward BTC price moves (especially if it’s accompanied with devastating downward fiat price moves in other parts of the economy). This is something I’ll be paying very close attention to later in the year because it’s a scenario that’s never ..6/
happened in Bitcoin, but could be a very real possibility IMHO. One of the things I love about Bitcoin is it’s a true free and open market, so if you choose or don’t choose to participate in these markets, you can’t blame anyone but yourself. No one is coming to bail you out. 7/
Bitcoin is making personal responsibility, accountability, and free and open markets real again. Finally, I’m not an expert in derivatives. Many people that will read this are. Please tell me where you think I’m wrong or what I might be missing. 8/
I know many undercollateralized lenders might suggest that it’s also important to consider reserves and the duration of terms for lending versus repayment, but I suspect a hyperbolic BTC price movement might make these traditional forms of managing risk correct in the ...9/
fractional reserve textbooks, but wrong in the unapologetic free and open Bitcoin market. My point in writing this post isn’t to point to any particular business or practice. My point is to raise awareness and start and important discussion...10/
that will serve the entire industry and market participants if such a scenario would play out in the future. @CaitlinLong_ @JeffBooth @BitcoinTina END/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Preston Pysh

Preston Pysh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PrestonPysh

8 Feb
I think a lot of people are underestimating the power that a mature derivatives market is going to bring to #Bitcoin during this cycle. As the price goes higher and volatility continues to grow, it incentivizes more and more long-short funds to capture the massive ... post/1
spreads which are near risk free. These spreads are huge and nothing compared to any other asset class in the world. Here's where it gets really interesting - to implement this strategy, one has to HAVE bitcoin to sell it short. So what are they doing? Well they are... post/2
borrowing Bitcoin. But to borrow Bitcoin, the borrower needs to over-collateralize their escrow! This means they need to lock-up more Bitcoin (because their fiat colleterial is immediately turned into BTC once the loan is written). So what's this all mean? It means ... post/3
Read 5 tweets
5 Jan
As things in the economy go from manipulated to ultra-manipulated, make sure you're ready for totally extreme changes. Although only a few companies are driving the stock indexes, they are heavily dependent on policy decisions and the aggressive addition of more fiat units into..
the collective global system. COVID policies, drastic changes in spending habits, lack of earnings power for the masses, are all likely to have a shocking liquidity experience to the system in the coming year. The amount of breadth at which the impairment will occur is nearly..
impossible to predict or forecast. The first chart I posted is simply demonstrating my opinion that the system is becoming increasingly unstable and the aperture for potential outcomes is widening. As policymakers respond to growing volatility (on a global level), their...
Read 8 tweets
2 Jan
At what point in 1923 German did it become evident that all trust in the Mark was lost?

The years leading up to 1923 were an aggressive devaluation where the paper Mark was debased 1 : 10,000 over a five year period of time. But once the debasement exceeded 10,000, it. ran.
The headlines in Germany during OCT 1922 were of particular note, according to the Frankfurter Zeitung: "German economic life is dominated by a struggle over the survival of the Mark: Is it to remain the German currency, or is it doomed to extinction? During the past few months
foreign currencies have replaced it as units of account in domestic transactions to a wholly unforeseen extent. The habit of reckoning in dollars, especially, has established itself, not only in firms internal accounting practice but above all as the method of price quotation
Read 7 tweets
28 Nov 20
I hear a lot of people say that S2F is an invalid model because it doesn’t account for demand. Here’s what I’m thinking.

As long as hashing keeps going up over time, that means there’s a minimum threshold of demand being applied to the #Bitcoin eco-system where miners ... 1/
Are acting as agents (among other roles) for swapping electrical bills denominated in fiat for Bitcoin. In essence, the Labor Theory of Value (LToV) is....Valid...but only in this unique situation. This is a very unpopular opinion because most people believe Adam Smith’s ..2/
antiquated economic model for determining value is invalid in almost all modern instances (which I agree with). In this particular situation though, you’re measuring the work being performed at one of the most raw levels: energy expenses for computations conducted. 3/
Read 14 tweets
13 Nov 20
But professor...

When you told me #Bitcoin was a Ponzi scheme you left out the part about the four-year halving cycle and two-week difficulty adjustment...

How does that work?

//Thread Post 1 Image
So you've probably heard your professor or resident expert economist tell you that #Bitcoin is a scam. Well, guess what, it's not. Everyone keeps claiming it's dead, but here we are, it keeps coming back and with a vengeance. How is that happening? Easy. The code is designed
to slowly gain entrenchment into the existing financial rails and eventually take over as a global reserve settle money. If it happens too quickly or linearly, governments would attempt to shut it down. But If it happens slow enough - and volatile enough - deep entrenchment
Read 21 tweets
16 Oct 20
Based on the extreme debasement that's been occurring and that's expected to continue, I would suggest adopting a new unit of measure. Although the world will continue to settle in dollars or other major fiat currencies, that doesn't mean you should measure your growth in... 1/
buying power with fiat units. For people that find Bitcoin to be undesirable, the most common alternative is gold. For example, look at the performance of the S&P 500 if you measure it in gold instead of the US dollar. Down 25% since peaking near the end of 2018. 2/
If measuring the S&P500 with dollars over that same period of time (since late 2018), an investor is up nominally 19% in dollar terms, but relative to gold their buying power (for retained earnings) has diminished by 50%. So, this begs an interesting question, what could be 3/
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!