Academics isn't for the faint of heart. Its about fostering an environment filled with debate and active criticism. We build structured arguments which others dismember, often politely through questioning or a satirical jab. How has academics faired through the C19 response? 1/
Quite poorly, its hard to imagine a worse outcome. We dismembered the academic environment at the very time it was needed. We shuttered debate and thought, to the point of almost criminalizing it. Universities debased themselves as did our other societal institutions. 2/
C19 revealed that academics were just like everyone else. We weren't a pillar of intellectual strength or a reservoir of sober second thought. Not in the least. We easily surcome to the fear and panic narrative created by an undisciplined public health community. 3/
C19 will bring a reckoning, it won't be pleasant. We treasure tenure and the principles of academic freedom; society affords us this luxury for one reason. We are expected to diversify debate, to be fearlessly truthful (as best we can determine) even when publicly unpopular. 4/
We utterly failed in this duty, not unlike huge swaths of the media. We acted like cowards; we sat at home and collected a pay check. Rarely a peep, even from those with the knowledge/experience society so desperately needed. We were pathetically feable. 5/
Perhaps worse, some in academia treated C19 as a "hustle", an opportunity to enrich themselves or for self promotion. Rewards were tied to towing the line and to closing down debate, the very essence of a university. 6/
Contributing to this failure were our vaulted university administrators. Nearly invisible for the last year, their sole accomplishments centered on delivering a subpar educational experience and the smothering of free thought with "safety" culture. 7/
Perhaps C19 provide academics and administrators an opportunity for critical self assessment. Do we want universities and those within to be dull, uninspiring and lacking in courage? Its time to rethink our existence and what we stand for. End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Donald Welsh

Donald Welsh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DonaldWelsh16

15 Feb
Great treasure trove of ideas comes out of Kelly Brown's dive into C19 statistics. From when/where did the virus originate, when did it come to Ontario, to what happened in LTCs, listen and learn. Building into the first theme.....1/

We still don't have a satisfying C19 origin story. The WHO's recent fact finding mission to China, resolved little and raised the possibility that the C19 epidemic may have started earlier and outside of Wuhan. So.....2/
This is a chart of industrial CO2 production from the @EthicalSkeptic. As he points out, based on the assumption that drops in CO2 production equate to health events, China appeared to be fighting a significant event maybe in 2018/early 2019. 3/
Read 4 tweets
1 Feb
Alex Berensen's reasoning is clear. C19 will end simply because the lie is consuming the ability of gov't and society to function. Two questions remain, why and how. I don't have clear answers to either, but I can speculate. 1/
As to why, I defer to my favorite journalist (Peter Hitchens) who reminds us to never underestimate gov'ts ability to do stunning stupid things. From the start, he linked the logic of the west's C19 response to that of the decaying eastern block nations he used to cover. 2/
C19 is most certainly real but what seems clear is that gov't got the scale of the threat wrong. This isn't trivial, when modeling is out by 25X, it massively impacts gov't actions and scares politicians into acting rashly. 3/
Read 11 tweets
19 Jan
There is something quite remarkable about Sweden. They decided early on to adhere to established public health practices and refused to panic. They rationalized a viral threat and established a risk based policy. 1/
That policy was built on trust and knowledge of its population. There was no fanfare or dramatic pressers filled with breying politicans. Just dull workman like activity moderating risk while society functioned. 2/
Public trust enables transparency and that is what you see below. A summarized version of Sweden's final Covid report. Take a read and appreciate the thoughtful deliberation. Data analysis is clear, candid and unromantic. 3/

…edevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/fin…
Read 12 tweets
18 Jan
Canada has shrunk as a nation. Our minds dulled by relentless propaganda, uninspiring leaders, a lazy media and an absent academic class. Those aren't my words but of a colleague travelling to his birth country with decidedly less resources. They were struck by the contrast. 1/
C19, a rather standard albeit slightly more virulent respiratory virus,has brought a nation to its knees. Panic and fear runs amuck and simple statistics fail to penetrate the collective consciousness. 2/
C19 strikes the frail and the vulnerable which was utterly predictable. Our response has been to ignore the frail, then shutter society and prevent kids from going to school and tobogganing. The logic is opaque to any reasonable citizen so where did it come from? 3/
Read 10 tweets
16 Jan
I would like add two further comments to Mr. Baber's rational approach to C19, one of whcih centers on communication. The York MPP has been appropriately critical of the gov't narrative and the wide spread seeding of panic and fear. 1/
Rule #1 in an emergency response is to maintain trust and not to sow panic and fear. Unfortunately, the provincial and federal gov'ts have done just that aided by an undisciplined science panel. This simply needs to change for the health of everyone. 2/
The Ontario science panels lacks the skill set needed to run an effective C19 response. Academics can provide high level theory and analysis of critical data. They have little understanding of societal function, basic logistics or emergency management. 3/
Read 6 tweets
16 Jan
Mr. Baber provides a well supported critique of gov't C19 policies and actions. He displays good working knowledge of facts which I would expect of an MPP who takes his job seriously. I have a few additional thoughts to aid this critique. 1/
The modeling by any standard has been wildly inaccurate. There are two main reasons for this. 1) the model itself is incorrectly constructed or 2) the underlying assumptions are inaccurate. Mr. Baber's information reminds me that both are likely the case. 2/
For example, the chart highlights a focus on asymptomatic transmission. This is a fringe concept. If present, and that is a big "IF", it's extremely low and not at the levels noted. This concept remains highly controversial and experimental support is near nonexistent. 3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!