It's not ill intentioned, but don't you think that if I am writing about night trains in Europe... I might have encountered ÖBB's NightJets already? 🤔
And yes, I don't work in the rail industry. There are loads of technical things I do not know, and cannot know, and I am super happy to learn those - and loads of nerds help me enormously with that - dozens of those people are on Twitter and they're ace
But as far as any lay person goes then I think I have a pretty good understanding of what is going on... much of it has been written up here as well: jonworth.eu/category/trans…
And also given that political communication and EU politics are my fields of expertise, it ought to surely be a fair assumption that when it comes to the politics of rail in the European Union I might be able to understand it
/rant over
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Basically everything agreed is too hard to do, grace periods to be extended long beyond April
Leads to legal uncertainty
Typical quote:
Michael Gove "It does not threaten the integrity of the EU single market to have bulbs ordered from a wholesaler in Scotland or England which will then be planted in a garden in Belfast or Ballymena."
I've been pointed towards this by @hanskundnani by @MaryFitzger - entitled "What does it mean to be “pro-European” today?" While there is something to it, I think it mixes up different terms, and hence it's not quite right... This 🧵 will explain
I am also of course aware the title might not be Hans's choice...
The first issue is a basic one: to be a European, or to be a pro-European, are not - in my view - the same things
2/13
I will happily call myself a European, but not a pro-European (although plenty would describe *me* as the latter), because pro-European leads us to looking at the European Union in terms of more or less of it, rather than the individual policy outcomes it can produce