1/ i've been thinking about what would happen in a #NFT art & collectibles bear market πΌπ§Έπ»
first, one point: a NFT is only (financially) worth what someone else will pay for it
period- end of discussion
if no one wants to buy your NFT in a year, it is worth ZERO
2/ let's also acknowledge that there is a TON of content being created right now
frankly, a lot of it is trite & derivative- but i respect the creative expression nonetheless in some cases
much of it is not that attractive, original, or has any kind of interesting provenance
3/ many such pieces will not retain ANY monetary value
some collections will be sold into the ground with supply hitting marketplaces that no one wants to buy in a bear
for work that may remain meaningful in the long-run, buyers will step in, but possibly at very steep discount
4/ some series which fall prey to this may recover substantial valuation in the future-
IF NFT art is here to stay (i think it is),
and if they were parts of limited supply collections that people later deem to be significant in some way
5/ so this brings us to the question: what happens to the so-called "canonical" collections?
many of these are OG series (take CryptoPunks, Autoglyphs, and others) which did something for the first time
what happens to them?
it depends on who's buying them right now and why
6/ i do think a fair amount of supply for these is distributing into "long-term" collector hands
as long as they aren't overextended, and as long as they truly believe in the NFT space long-term, they will not distribute their holdings- even in a bear
7/ but there is also no doubt that we are seeing more unsophisticated retail & speculators FOMO'ing into some of these markets
i don't know when that FOMO ends, and it's also possible we've only seen it barely begun
8/ overall, this started as stuff a few hardcore Ethereum nerds were interested in, which has now progressed into stuff people like Chamath and Cuban may be buying
likely with plenty of mainstream retail on their heels, looking for digital art in an increasingly digital world
9/ not much to do here, imo, other than manage risk
i would NOT put a catastrophic loss amount of my net worth into NFT art right now
don't buy to flip, unless you know what you're doing and can take the risks associated with this
10/ instead, buy pieces you love, and would want to hold through a bear market πβ
and from artists / platforms that you want to support
plan to hold them for years, and enjoy the emergence of what i think we'll look back on as truly innovative and historic art forms
π€πΌ
11/ as for me, i mostly only buy large amounts for my long-term collection, from series i deem to be canonical (though i like to have some fun sometimes, too)
these are the collections i have the most meaningful long-term positions in
1/ I'm getting TONS of messages me asking me "Hey DC, what #NFTs should I buy?
The proper answer is ONLY ones that you enjoy and are willing to hold for years or possibly for forever.
But I will tell you some of the ones I have bought recently and why (MEGA-thread below)π
2/ First, let's start with some caution: don't buy NFTs *expecting* financial return. You may be very disappointed.
Tastes can shift very quickly and decisively, and given market illiquidity, we could see price collapse under panic conditions.
I buy to collect & hold for years.
3/ Second, let's discuss the only blockchain I'll buy high-value #NFTs on- that's #Ethereum.
Why? The linked thread covers it, but to summarize, I can't afford to put big sums of money into chains cutoff from DeFi and which might not exist in 5-10 years.
@RaoulGMI I only need once sentence for each of these:
$AAVE will be the world's largest bank & asset lender.
$SNX will be the world's largest synthetic asset provider.
$UNI will be the world's largest exchange.
$YFI will be the world's largest asset allocation protocol.
$AAVE is one of the leading asset deposit / lend protocols. #1 in TVL (Maker ahead, but that's a CDP protocol for DAI). Team busts their butt to add new integrations with other protocols and to build bridges into real world.
@RaoulGMI IMO, $AAVE is probably my top pick to be the most valuable protocol in DeFi for the near future.
It and other lending protocols will act like huge billows, bringing in real world liquidity (as USD) to fuel people going long on crypto in DeFi (as they can continually earn yield).
1/ I've written comments in the @iearnfinance / $YFI forums in recent days on investing in the protocol's future growth.
First & foremost, I think devs should be compensated for their work & any actions taken should be focused on optimizing for long-term growth of the protocol.
2/ I'm open to a range of possibilities on how to achieve this, but we need to get it right this time.
Is a one-time mint the answer? Or over 5 years? Are the rewards vesting? What do we do after 5 years with new devs? What happens with income if we mint?
All open questions.
3/ But as someone with a material amount of YFI, I do get tired of being treated like some sort of asshole bagholder.
I just don't believe in taking reckless impulsive action without proper analysis when it comes to creating long-term incentives & necessary checks & balances.
1/ While I appreciate the spirit in which this proposal is offered, I would not support it with the current parameters.
Income is core to the $YFI value prop. Eliminating it entirely would be a bad call, IMO. But creating a mechanism for intelligent reinvestment makes sense.
2/ Simply buying $YFI with all protocol income and putting it into a governance-controlled fund sounds good on paper, but it would create a massive pot of money which people would fight over on a monthly or quarterly basis.
Who would govern the distribution of these funds?
3/ In the current model, some amount of income from the Treasury goes to grants. IMO, the distribution of these grants thus far has been extremely informal.
Have the grants incentivized gainful development around the protocol? Maybe in some cases, but how much?
It's NOT users, app devs, investors, or miners directly. And it's NOT any firm (though they may be paid by them).
They work FOR the *public good* that is Ethereum. They administer it, but it is all of the others who give it value.
2/ IMO, public goods like Ethereum should be provided consistent with a mission.
And in ways that seek to 1) maximize broad benefits/end-use, 2) minimize broad harm, and 3) judiciously & transparently assign concentrated benefits (only if required to administer the good itself).
3/ Providing a public good like Ethereum to a broad swathe of stakeholders who make use of it every day isn't easy.
It requires exercising real judgement, making complex trade-off decisions.
Peaceful articulation of disagreement with decisions is part of that process.