1/ i've been thinking about what would happen in a #NFT art & collectibles bear market πŸ–ΌπŸ§ΈπŸ»

first, one point: a NFT is only (financially) worth what someone else will pay for it

period- end of discussion

if no one wants to buy your NFT in a year, it is worth ZERO
2/ let's also acknowledge that there is a TON of content being created right now

frankly, a lot of it is trite & derivative- but i respect the creative expression nonetheless in some cases

much of it is not that attractive, original, or has any kind of interesting provenance
3/ many such pieces will not retain ANY monetary value

some collections will be sold into the ground with supply hitting marketplaces that no one wants to buy in a bear

for work that may remain meaningful in the long-run, buyers will step in, but possibly at very steep discount
4/ some series which fall prey to this may recover substantial valuation in the future-

IF NFT art is here to stay (i think it is),

and if they were parts of limited supply collections that people later deem to be significant in some way
5/ so this brings us to the question: what happens to the so-called "canonical" collections?

many of these are OG series (take CryptoPunks, Autoglyphs, and others) which did something for the first time

what happens to them?

it depends on who's buying them right now and why
6/ i do think a fair amount of supply for these is distributing into "long-term" collector hands

as long as they aren't overextended, and as long as they truly believe in the NFT space long-term, they will not distribute their holdings- even in a bear
7/ but there is also no doubt that we are seeing more unsophisticated retail & speculators FOMO'ing into some of these markets

i don't know when that FOMO ends, and it's also possible we've only seen it barely begun
8/ overall, this started as stuff a few hardcore Ethereum nerds were interested in, which has now progressed into stuff people like Chamath and Cuban may be buying

likely with plenty of mainstream retail on their heels, looking for digital art in an increasingly digital world
9/ not much to do here, imo, other than manage risk

i would NOT put a catastrophic loss amount of my net worth into NFT art right now

don't buy to flip, unless you know what you're doing and can take the risks associated with this
10/ instead, buy pieces you love, and would want to hold through a bear market πŸ’ŽβœŠ

and from artists / platforms that you want to support

plan to hold them for years, and enjoy the emergence of what i think we'll look back on as truly innovative and historic art forms

πŸ€–πŸ–Ό
11/ as for me, i mostly only buy large amounts for my long-term collection, from series i deem to be canonical (though i like to have some fun sometimes, too)

these are the collections i have the most meaningful long-term positions in

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with DCinvestor | Aftab

DCinvestor | Aftab Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iamDCinvestor

16 Feb
so, #NFTs are in a "bubble"

but anything being priced properly for the first time based on a surge of new interest experiences bubbles

the question is how far will it go and how far would it crash

but IMO, many underestimate the degree to which "distribution" is occurring

πŸ‘‡
collections which used to be much more concentrated in the hands of speculators are ending up in the hands of long-term collectors

many buy just a couple of pieces to be a part of history, and won't sell at any price really

meanwhile, the potential collector-base is growing

πŸ‘‡
so far, it's literally been a few hundred to a few thousand nerds playing with this stuff

some are foundational collections in an emerging art form & ownership model

as usual, many will miss the big picture

i count on it, so i can accumulate quality for my collection

πŸ–ΌπŸ’ŽβœŠ
Read 5 tweets
14 Feb
1/ I'm getting TONS of messages me asking me "Hey DC, what #NFTs should I buy?

The proper answer is ONLY ones that you enjoy and are willing to hold for years or possibly for forever.

But I will tell you some of the ones I have bought recently and why (MEGA-thread below)πŸ‘‡
2/ First, let's start with some caution: don't buy NFTs *expecting* financial return. You may be very disappointed.

Tastes can shift very quickly and decisively, and given market illiquidity, we could see price collapse under panic conditions.

I buy to collect & hold for years.
3/ Second, let's discuss the only blockchain I'll buy high-value #NFTs on- that's #Ethereum.

Why? The linked thread covers it, but to summarize, I can't afford to put big sums of money into chains cutoff from DeFi and which might not exist in 5-10 years.

Read 23 tweets
21 Jan
@RaoulGMI I only need once sentence for each of these:

$AAVE will be the world's largest bank & asset lender.
$SNX will be the world's largest synthetic asset provider.
$UNI will be the world's largest exchange.
$YFI will be the world's largest asset allocation protocol.
@RaoulGMI OK, I'll give you some paragraphs too @RaoulGMI πŸ‘‡

$AAVE is one of the leading asset deposit / lend protocols. #1 in TVL (Maker ahead, but that's a CDP protocol for DAI). Team busts their butt to add new integrations with other protocols and to build bridges into real world.
@RaoulGMI IMO, $AAVE is probably my top pick to be the most valuable protocol in DeFi for the near future.

It and other lending protocols will act like huge billows, bringing in real world liquidity (as USD) to fuel people going long on crypto in DeFi (as they can continually earn yield).
Read 9 tweets
16 Jan
1/ I've written comments in the @iearnfinance / $YFI forums in recent days on investing in the protocol's future growth.

First & foremost, I think devs should be compensated for their work & any actions taken should be focused on optimizing for long-term growth of the protocol.
2/ I'm open to a range of possibilities on how to achieve this, but we need to get it right this time.

Is a one-time mint the answer? Or over 5 years? Are the rewards vesting? What do we do after 5 years with new devs? What happens with income if we mint?

All open questions.
3/ But as someone with a material amount of YFI, I do get tired of being treated like some sort of asshole bagholder.

I just don't believe in taking reckless impulsive action without proper analysis when it comes to creating long-term incentives & necessary checks & balances.
Read 6 tweets
29 Oct 20
1/ While I appreciate the spirit in which this proposal is offered, I would not support it with the current parameters.

Income is core to the $YFI value prop. Eliminating it entirely would be a bad call, IMO. But creating a mechanism for intelligent reinvestment makes sense.
2/ Simply buying $YFI with all protocol income and putting it into a governance-controlled fund sounds good on paper, but it would create a massive pot of money which people would fight over on a monthly or quarterly basis.

Who would govern the distribution of these funds?
3/ In the current model, some amount of income from the Treasury goes to grants. IMO, the distribution of these grants thus far has been extremely informal.

Have the grants incentivized gainful development around the protocol? Maybe in some cases, but how much?
Read 5 tweets
25 Feb 20
1/ Who/what do Ethereum core devs "work for"?

It's NOT users, app devs, investors, or miners directly. And it's NOT any firm (though they may be paid by them).

They work FOR the *public good* that is Ethereum. They administer it, but it is all of the others who give it value.
2/ IMO, public goods like Ethereum should be provided consistent with a mission.

And in ways that seek to 1) maximize broad benefits/end-use, 2) minimize broad harm, and 3) judiciously & transparently assign concentrated benefits (only if required to administer the good itself).
3/ Providing a public good like Ethereum to a broad swathe of stakeholders who make use of it every day isn't easy.

It requires exercising real judgement, making complex trade-off decisions.

Peaceful articulation of disagreement with decisions is part of that process.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!