1/ I'm getting TONS of messages me asking me "Hey DC, what #NFTs should I buy?
The proper answer is ONLY ones that you enjoy and are willing to hold for years or possibly for forever.
But I will tell you some of the ones I have bought recently and why (MEGA-thread below)π
2/ First, let's start with some caution: don't buy NFTs *expecting* financial return. You may be very disappointed.
Tastes can shift very quickly and decisively, and given market illiquidity, we could see price collapse under panic conditions.
I buy to collect & hold for years.
3/ Second, let's discuss the only blockchain I'll buy high-value #NFTs on- that's #Ethereum.
Why? The linked thread covers it, but to summarize, I can't afford to put big sums of money into chains cutoff from DeFi and which might not exist in 5-10 years.
4/ With that out of the way, the first "art" project I started to dive into (after years of being personally focused on in-game NFTs), was #CryptoPunks by @larvalabs.
Punks are widely acknowledged to be the first digital collectible on Ethereum, pre-dating the ERC-721 standard.
5/ There are only 10,000 CryptoPunks, algorithmically generated with no two alike.
At launch in June 2017, these were basically given away. Now, the least expensive costs ~$14K / more than 7 ETH.
6/ My thesis behind Punks is as blockchain art takes off, more people will want to own one of the OG collectibles. They have an 8-bit charm and make for fun avatars (like mine).
At 10K, there are enough to sustain a broad collector base, but also scarce enough to be valuable.
7/ Once I got a few Punks in my collection, I realized that I had been missing out on an entire world of #Ethereum collectibles.
The next stop on my journey must be $SOCKS, aka Unisocks from @Uniswap.
8/ #DeFi will go down in history as a cataclysmic shift in finance (perhaps the biggest since the 1400s), and the emergence of Uniswap with Automated Market Maker technology will be a key part of that.
$SOCKS are actually ERC-20 tokens, redeemable for a NFT & real socks.
9/ $SOCKS have been around for a while and the price has climbed substantially (now at $37K).
Only 315 are left which have not been redeemed, and I plan to hold mine (unredeemed) as a collectible piece of DeFi history.
10/ The next NFT project I jumped into at the advice of some Punk-ers were @TheHashmasks. Inspired by CryptoPunks, they take the concept and turn it up to 11.
Not just beautiful avatars, but token emission (as $NCT), hidden symbols and riddles, and a strong community.
11/ I don't know what the future holds for HashMasks, but I have a feeling that we ain't seen anything yet. IMO, link Punks, these have a shot at being remembered as OG pieces like Punks.
Here are a few I grabbed / generated during the initial minting.
12/ It was at that moment that something clicked for me. π‘
One of the most promising genres of art on the blockchain would be "generative art."
Art, generated by algorithms, created by an artist. And the hash for the minting tx provides the randomness.
13/ Both Punks & HashMasks are forms of generative art (focused on avatars). But as the #NFT art scene on #Ethereum gains awareness, more people will want to collect high quality art for the sake of aesthetics and new forms of expression.
14/ @artblocks_io provides a platform by which artists can publish quality generative art.
Here, there is far less focus on gimmicks than on the art itself. IMO, they are helping to establish a new genre of art by marrying it with its perfect medium: the Ethereum blockchain.
15/ #generativeart has been around for a while, but IMO, it shines when it meets blockchain based distribution.
Imagine limited edition series where 100 to 1000 pieces are minted. Each is unique (based on the algo), but has a cohesive feel as a set.
Perfect art collectibles.
16/ @artblocks_io has been around for several months and has already built up a stunning collection.
While I think many of the series have great aesthetic value (and own pieces from many), the Ringers series from @dmitricherniak has captivated me.
17/ More than any other series, this helped me view generative art as a beautiful art form with epic potential.
Each piece is beautiful, but when taken as a collection, the diversity, yet effortless cohesion, is stunning.
Something tells me this will become a canonical series.
18/ Once I saw the beauty (and potential) in generative art to become THE genre which blockchain could give life and meaning to, I scrambled to collect pieces from some of the foundational series in the genre.
19/ #Autoglyphs are recognized as the very first instances of generative art on the Ethereum blockchain. Only 512 were created, with an origin story similar to #CryptoPunks.
These may be remembered as THE series which gave life to this new genre of art.
20/ After chatting with some folks, I realized I had missed another piece of history: @squigglyWTF
Squiggly helped catalyze the NFT gen art scene, and many view it as a turning point in the genre.
Only 100 were created, and I think they're beautiful.
@RaoulGMI I only need once sentence for each of these:
$AAVE will be the world's largest bank & asset lender.
$SNX will be the world's largest synthetic asset provider.
$UNI will be the world's largest exchange.
$YFI will be the world's largest asset allocation protocol.
$AAVE is one of the leading asset deposit / lend protocols. #1 in TVL (Maker ahead, but that's a CDP protocol for DAI). Team busts their butt to add new integrations with other protocols and to build bridges into real world.
@RaoulGMI IMO, $AAVE is probably my top pick to be the most valuable protocol in DeFi for the near future.
It and other lending protocols will act like huge billows, bringing in real world liquidity (as USD) to fuel people going long on crypto in DeFi (as they can continually earn yield).
1/ I've written comments in the @iearnfinance / $YFI forums in recent days on investing in the protocol's future growth.
First & foremost, I think devs should be compensated for their work & any actions taken should be focused on optimizing for long-term growth of the protocol.
2/ I'm open to a range of possibilities on how to achieve this, but we need to get it right this time.
Is a one-time mint the answer? Or over 5 years? Are the rewards vesting? What do we do after 5 years with new devs? What happens with income if we mint?
All open questions.
3/ But as someone with a material amount of YFI, I do get tired of being treated like some sort of asshole bagholder.
I just don't believe in taking reckless impulsive action without proper analysis when it comes to creating long-term incentives & necessary checks & balances.
1/ While I appreciate the spirit in which this proposal is offered, I would not support it with the current parameters.
Income is core to the $YFI value prop. Eliminating it entirely would be a bad call, IMO. But creating a mechanism for intelligent reinvestment makes sense.
2/ Simply buying $YFI with all protocol income and putting it into a governance-controlled fund sounds good on paper, but it would create a massive pot of money which people would fight over on a monthly or quarterly basis.
Who would govern the distribution of these funds?
3/ In the current model, some amount of income from the Treasury goes to grants. IMO, the distribution of these grants thus far has been extremely informal.
Have the grants incentivized gainful development around the protocol? Maybe in some cases, but how much?
It's NOT users, app devs, investors, or miners directly. And it's NOT any firm (though they may be paid by them).
They work FOR the *public good* that is Ethereum. They administer it, but it is all of the others who give it value.
2/ IMO, public goods like Ethereum should be provided consistent with a mission.
And in ways that seek to 1) maximize broad benefits/end-use, 2) minimize broad harm, and 3) judiciously & transparently assign concentrated benefits (only if required to administer the good itself).
3/ Providing a public good like Ethereum to a broad swathe of stakeholders who make use of it every day isn't easy.
It requires exercising real judgement, making complex trade-off decisions.
Peaceful articulation of disagreement with decisions is part of that process.