A thread ONLY aimed to present PREVIOUS information on PREVIOUS outbreaks. History sometimes repeats itself, so do persons/institutions/procedures. Any analysis based on reappearance of similar institutions/procedures/persons should take difference in time/tech into consideration
#2013H7N9#H7N9
The 2013 H7N9 has similarities with COVID-19: first detected, Shanghai public health center et al.
So, let's roll.
#H7N9 Well, it also had online remours, chatting, before authority acknowledged the cases.
#H7N9 it also had the report to government, the difference with #COVID19 was #H7N9 concerning the LOCAL cases in Shanghai. 1/7
#H7N9#SPHCC
It also had a story bluebook for the media
#H7N9#SPHCC
It also had an embargo on Genbank sequences(segments using Sanger at the time), and #CHINACDC uploaded on #GISAID. Sounds familiar? AND what a coincidence that same Linda was handling the submission as #MN908947
#H7N9#SPHCC
It also had a period 'not to go public', sounds familiar?
#H7N9#SPHCC
It also had contract to commercialise the test kit, sounds familiar?
#H7N9#CHINACDC China CDC also issued internal newsletter.
#H7N9#IMBCAMS
IMBCAMS also participated in the initial Identification of the potential pathogen. Sounds familiar? 1/2
#SPHCC This thread is about the BSL-3 lab in Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, the exact lab released #MN908947. A bit of history and background.
A summary by previous head of BSL-3, who passed away due to illness in 2017. 1/2
2/2
#SPHCC Prof.Yongzhen Zhang stared in Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from 2017.
#SPHCC So did Fan Wu. In BSL-3 after Yunwen Hu passed away.
#2015H7N9#SPHCC
H7N9 human case in 2015 by Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center. 1/2
#H1N1
The 2009 H1N1 pandemic also had similarities. It was a global pandemic, except originated outside Asia.
So, let's roll.
#H1N1 The minutes of meeting during the initial response of China National Influenza Center. And yes, they equipped the sentinel labs with home-brew assays ASAP. 1/2
#H1N1
Of course, China National Influenza Center of China CDC also had contract to commercialise the test kit.
Here is the minutes of meeting between China CDC and Kinghawk medical.
#H1N1 here is the report of the process of commercialisation. 1/10
#MERS The 2012-2013 also had similarities, the first beta coronavirus outbreak after 2003 #SARS, person in charge was the same compared with #COVID19.
So, let's roll.
#MERS The China CDC diagnosis guidelines, and they didn't hide test protocols compared with #COVID19. 1/5
#H7N9#SHANGHAICDC
How to funnel lucrative national fundings into personal accounts?
1)for starter, paid RETIRED members of the lab in terms of 'data analysis' 1/2
#H7N9#SHANGHAICDC
How to funnel lucrative national fundings into personal accounts?
1)for starter, paid RETIRED members of the lab in terms of 'data analysis' 2/4
#H7N9#SHANGHAICDC
How to funnel lucrative national fundings into personal accounts?
2)paid for our 'white glove' for a resume polishing trip to Broad Institute of #Harvard. 3/4
#H7N9#SHANGHAICDC
How to funnel lucrative national fundings into personal accounts?
2)paid for our 'white glove' for a resume polishing trip to Broad Institute of #Harvard. 4/4
#CHINACDC#CNIC#GISAID#H7N9#H5N6#H10N8
The timeline of China national influenza center shared genome via GISAID. 1/2
And, CNIC got 2009 H1N1 sequence from US CDC via GISAID, thus helped the development of the detection assay.
#H7N9#CHINACDC#CNIC 2015 pre-inauguration display of Yuelong Shu, the head of CNIC then, dean of public health school of SYSU now, scientific advisory board of #GISAID 1/4
#H7N9#CHINACDC#CNIC 2015 pre-inauguration display of Yuelong Shu, the head of CNIC then, dean of public health school of SYSU now, scientific advisory board of #GISAID 2/4
#H7N9#CHINACDC#CNIC 2015 pre-inauguration display of Yuelong Shu, the head of CNIC then, dean of public health school of SYSU now, scientific advisory board of #GISAID 3/4
#H7N9#CHINACDC#CNIC 2015 pre-inauguration display of Yuelong Shu, the head of CNIC then, dean of public health school of SYSU now, scientific advisory board of #GISAID 4/4
#FUDAN#CHINACDC 2018 George Gaofu's report on novel emerging infectious diseases.
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 1/11
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 2/11
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 3/11
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 4/11
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 5/11
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 6/11
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 7/11
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 8/11
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 9/11
#CHINACDC#H7N9 The working manual for H7N9 by China CDC, April 2013. 10/11
#COVID19#SPHCC
Take sometime to read the following. History repeats itself, only this time worse. I leave to you to fill out the blanks for covid-19. The full original docs are in the threads if anyone cares to research.
My question: what will happen next time?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An article full of mistakes. 1. A commercial NGS company, Visionmedical, first sequenced and assembled full genome of this bat-like beta coronavirus from sample of a unknown pneumonia patient in Wuhan, before 2020.
2. The 'rectification' was a result of a normal and yearly CNAS biosaftey inspection, btn 3rd-5th Jan 2020, an expert team of 5 did a full inspection, evaluated the emergency response of SHPHCC BSL-3 lab. After inspection, expert team listed 8 issues, suggested rectifications
according to CNAS regulations asap.
In comparison, a CNAS expert team of 4 listed 7 issues and suggested rectifications according to CNAS regulations, in the biosafety inspection in year 2018.
Both above were posted on SHPHCC website news section with timestamp and photos.
Absolutely GOLD to watch the usual participants and media launched campaign again repeating March 2023.
Absolutely shame to use 8 young students' future as human shield to spark this nonsense, nobody actually cares abt these young students, whom weren't even enrolled in 2020.
The snapshots contain rich information. 1. 'it is a novel coronavirus' = distinctive from SARS1, must have been successfully isolated from patient samples, must have been verified (revisit the *chlamydia* in SARS1)
@martinenserink 2. W/o knowing the exact contents, based on the low resolution image and file name of the pptx, predated Virological. That alone, already can be treated as a high confidence evidence that China, through GISAID, was providing a unique additional info regarding the novel cov to WHO
@martinenserink 3. By a glance of the low resolution image of pptx, a possible standard NJ tree of ORF1b. Normally, considering the file size, one page ppt would incl the details of tree creation, against CoV family or particular strains, and *source(s)* of the colour highlighten genomes.
chinaxiv.org/abs/202303.103…
Would love to have a comparison of June 2022 revision and today's new release on ChinaXiv.
If available. So, pls, that 'reviewer who claims to have reviewed the manuscript for Nature'.
I am not caring too much for the conclusion part, as this new version seems targeting for expedited peer-review process. We all see 'toned down' with previous preprints vs publications.
What's important was the comparison of results in those versions.
If the June 2022 vs ChinaXiv, not much difference, and new version get published. Then, I think not CCDC but someone else get explanation to do.
Is it an established fact that no one on twitter or press seem bother emphasising? that: 1. In SAGO meeting, the original data generators said they already *KNEW* the raccoon dogs etc al sequence in the data they produced (before lifted embargo) , and was in the middle of
submitting a revision. 2. The coauthor(obviously not the communication authors with email listed and mobile number too well known to *everyone*) of both preprint and initial illumina data& BGI data, expressed during the initial contact, that(pls pay attention)
*we were told to release the data....feel free to analyse....happy to answer any questions... *.
A brief 'announcement'.😹 Busy with something more important, just break in briefly. 1. Pls, don't want to reply to the DMs flooded in, until we see the origonal data generators' own publication.
2. Accuracy...... If we want to avoid accusations of *power of media*, perhaps anyone point to me the reference of this specific usage implied transferring live animals, 'In one sample from a cart used to move cages', as if the reporter was there...... nature.com/articles/d4158…
3. I *strongly believed* that the original environmental sampling documents and records were written in *Chinese*, no? Why not?
So, if u googled 脱毛机, isn't human epilators all over ur screen? I knew it's hard for some male reviewer #3 to comprehend🤭.