2/ The key is that this is happening in most developed nations.
In these nations, investable opportunities are going down because practically their economies - roads, industries and so on - are built out.
Imagine you have money but nowhere profitable to invest. What happens?
3/ As investment opportunities become scarce, expected return from investments keep going down and for speculative projects it can actually be highly negative.
4/ Imagine your economy has mature mouse trap companies and a startup proposes to build yet another mouse trap, you should expect to lose a lot of money on that investment.
In comparison, holding cash looks more profitable.
5/ But then if you’re holding cash, why would interest rates become negative?
Because when people hold a currency, it appreciates as comparison to other currencies.
If Swiss francs are being held in banks and not getting spent/invested, the currency appreciates.
6/ What’s the harm with currency appreciation?
If your currency buys more stuff, importing becomes cheaper and by virtue of it domestic industry and exports decay.
In short, your country’s competitiveness suffers globally.
7/ So central banks want to disincentivize holding of their currency.
A negative interest is a push to make people spend or invest currency.
Because cash held - and not spent/invested - is bad news for domestic economy.
8/ To understand this better, refresh your memory with how money works and then everything will make more sense.
9/ In summary: negative interests are a consequence of wealthy folks having more cash than investable opportunities.
You can think of negative interest like a wealth tax, because it really is a country’s way to redistribute wealth from those who have it to those who need it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some people like bigger cars, others like efficient cars and then there are some who like premium cars.
That is, markets aren’t homogeneous. They consist of different sets of people who value different aspects in a solution.
2/ Because different segments value different aspects, an improvement in one aspect will only be appreciated by that segment and get ignored by everyone else in the market.
Since many folks are tagging me on this thread, here’s what I think about it.
1/ The argument isn’t that bitcoin is entirely useless, the argument is that cost-benefit tradeoff for it is *worse* than current systems such as banking or the Visa network
2/ Comparing bitcoin’s energy consumption with Gold mining is a false comparison.
Once gold is mined, it exists forever. If gold mining stops today, no additional energy will be consumed but gold transactions will still keep happening.
3/ If bitcoin mining stops today, no transactions can take place.
So the bitcoin mining has to keep happening forever for bitcoin transactions to occur.
1/ I’ve started imagining bitcoin as a virtual fortress which is secured mathematically so that even governments cannot seize it.
2/ There’s a price to pay to enter into this fortress but since there are limited entry tickets, if more people want to enter into it, the price keeps on going up.
2/ The key idea explored in the book is that the world has witnessed significant progress over the last few decades, but most people are unaware of that fact because they hold distorted views.