Urgh... looking at recent Grayzone/Anonymous leaked information and ‘reporting’ - because such docs are important for me to be aware of. I want to say the perpetual frustration is that good reporters will not usually touch this stuff. So people who want 2 know about it will...
be inevitably drawn to the Grayzone/Blumenthal appalling analysis of it. We need strong national security reporting by people who understand it orgs with legal backing willing to explain these practices when they emerge and explain them well.
Critical & accurate - Grayzone is not. Often only source to go to tho - and it adds an ill-informed paranoid lens. People need 2 read about things entering the public domain & lack of strong outlets is dire and feeds both lack of scrutiny & misinfo.
I am an academic and don’t have time to write a analysis explaining everything that comes out, I’m not funded to do it, I also would have to spend months finding somewhere willing to publish each piece somewhere who can ‘legal’ it etc... there needs to be an outlet for this.
Somewhere with strong independent journalists.
Mate and Blumenthal do not know what they are talking about.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
