There’s an unhelpful myth that people who believe in conspiracy theories must be stupid or uneducated. Such theories offer complex explanations for skeptical people about forces that feel outside our control. CTs industrial exploitation for political advantage is a major threat.
The problem is more complicated than education or corrections of individual facts. The main reason they are becoming such a problem presently is because they are being deliberately exploited by the influence industry for political actors and monetised for engagement by platforms.
Many false myths out there astrology for example, are limited in harm. Key questions are ‘at what point do conspiracy theories become harmful?’ The organized deliberate use & development of such theories should focus concern, esp mobilising violence. Not false beliefs as such.
Correcting falsehood in general is of course important, but it’s important not to lose perspective on the stark difference between a deliberate campaign to manipulate to undermine public decision-making and private beliefs.
Too much money & energy goes on responses that cast the public, not the powerful, as threat & distribution/consumption as point of intervention. It’s easier to access populations for research. Our solutions should be focused on industry producers & exploiters not their victims
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This raises real concerns about how robust the US investigation into Russia and #CambridgeAnalytica was. Appalling they did not ask for the data they needed to investigate then stated they could not get this from UK authorities!!!!
I just want to call attention to impt role of #AU student @zamaanq47 here - after I revealed that @ICONews had quietly abandoned their long-awaited final report on #CambridgeAnalytica, we chased @commonsDCMS & he was successful in pressing them to get Denham to speak today!
@zamaanq47@ICOnews@CommonsDCMS Everyone should give him a follow as he's very good at compiling and communicating the unfolding information from the community working on this subject.
IMPORTANT - Elizabeth Denham from @ICOnews just responded to question I’ve been asking re senate intelligence committee report into Russia vol 5 statement they couldn’t get #Cambridgeanalytica emails from UK authorities- they did NOT ask her and she WILL provide if they ask (!)
This is incredible not to mention they appear to have shifted blame for non investigation onto UK failure to provide data, which did not happen. The Biden administration must now properly investigate events that ushered in the Trump age which culminated in a violent insurrection!
As I’ve said before re Benkler et al Harvard study (which was widely used to dismiss #CambridgeAnalytica’s impact) it had valuable findings re insular ideological media but fails to understand relationship & coordinated strategy between social and legacy media in a campaign.
It’s not helpful to engage in this debate over what’s more important- social media or legacy forms of media now, it fails to understand the related roles they play. Both are important, and also important to each other.
It’s how they interact and are relatedly used that matters.
It’s good to see the media discussing possibility of coordination during the #brexit campaign again as more documents come out. This significance was unspoken in a lot of reporting on whether #CambridgeAnalytica worked on LeaveEU after @carolecadwalla and my evidence raised it.
Now people are seeing more of what the #CambridgeAnalytica scandal was about. The #scandal which spun off from it subsumed so much of the media attention it’s been difficult to get across other parts of the scandal. I discuss it all in my upcoming book see propagandamachine.tech
The media have done a MASSIVE injustice to Britain, America and the rest of the world in propagating the myth that #CambridgeAnalytica was just about the #Facebook scandal. This vital interpretation is in my upcoming book and I illustrate global reach here propagandamachine.tech
Training from #Emic may include the familiar faces including Nigel “no company’s whiter than white” Oakes - see my parliamentary evidence from 2018, here he is discussing how Hitler didn’t have a problem with the Jews...
Apparently these are trainers delivering methods that governments such as Canada and the Netherlands were happy to ignore the past history of unethical use to obtain. We must demand more of governments when they promise to investigate.
This is the most MUST-READ article/upcoming book I’ve seen in a long time thanks to @doctorow “How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism, a New Book by Cory Doctorow | OneZero” I disagree/agree in numerous ways I will detail but it’s thoughtful 👍 so: onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy…
This is how I have generally seen it... it’s really not about people posting targeted ads in new ways that are so convincing cause psychology in messaging... This misses the wider point. This is more structural.
this is not as much the type of activities I am focused on - people think information warfare is about sending about mass advertising 😬 no - you really have no idea, also small actions can produce big behavioral changes - you need to understand people to do that, not ads!